LUNR vs BA vs FLY Stock Comparison

Intuitive Machines, Boeing and Firefly Aerospace Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BA Boeing Co
$167.12 -9.4% 1M -25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$138.23B
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$94.91B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Boeing leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Boeing 5, Intuitive Machines 2, Firefly Aerospace 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLUNRBAFLYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.96B $138.23B $3.35B BA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.9x 18.9x -9.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +116.9% +17.5% +179.2% FLY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -26.8% 7.7% -129.1% BA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -560.6% 18.2% -25.8% BA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 2.1x 2.1x LUNR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.2% -25.2% -23.0% LUNR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -4.2%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 110.2% 36.2% 106.9% BA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 57/100 35/100 BA

Percentile Scorecard

LUNRBAFLY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLUNRBAFLY
Valuation 22 #78 of 100 65 #36 of 100 15 #85 of 100
Growth 26 #72 of 97 87 #14 of 97 59 #40 of 97
Profitability 26 #71 of 96 65 #34 of 96 22 #75 of 96
Financial Health 22 #82 of 105 13 #92 of 105 69 #33 of 105
Shareholder Returns – – 11 #58 of 65
Overall 24 57 35
  • LUNR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • BA ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • FLY ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLUNRBAFLYSPY
1 month -23.7%-9.4%-17.7% +0.9%
3 months +1.8%-21.9%+11.3% +5.9%
6 months -53.2%-25.4%-40.7% +8.5%
Year to date -28.6%-23.0%-11.3% +13.3%
1 year -6.2%-25.2%-23.0% +12.4%
3 years +334.1%-7.0%— +88.1%
3 years, per year +63.2%-2.4%— +23.5%
5 years —-19.3%— +68.2%
5 years, per year —-4.2%— +11.0%
10 years —+16.9%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+1.6%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLUNRBAFLYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 110.2%36.2%106.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 100.7%36.4%98.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.771.183.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.06-0.70-0.21 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-50.3%-73.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.6%-33.7%-66.2% -0.9%
52-week high $45.70$252.15$58.81 $779.14
52-week low $8.05$167.12$16.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLUNRBAFLY
P/E now vs peer median -14.3xmedian 26.4x 18.1xmedian 26.4x -8.7xmedian 26.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 3.0x 1.4xmedian 3.0x 11.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -25.1xmedian 14.5x 13.1xmedian 14.5x -9.2xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13.9xmedian 26.1x 8,277xmedian 26.1x -10.1xmedian 26.1x
P/B now vs peer median -9.0xmedian 2.5x 20.2xmedian 2.5x 2.7xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.90 0.31median 0.90 —median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLUNRBAFLY
Revenue $490.12M $94.91B $287.01M
Gross profit $83.23M $8.94B $65.79M
Operating income -$134.85M $9.74B -$338.66M
Net income -$184.98M $7.66B -$363.46M
Free cash flow -$187.75M $16.00M -$326.49M
R&D $14.69M $3.62B $245.37M
EPS (diluted) $-0.81 $9.22 $-2.29
Cash & equivalents $367.40M $9.50B $459.82M
Total debt $336.35M $45.92B $27.00M
Shares (diluted) 162.17M 792.90M 161.78M
Enterprise value $153.79M $47.19B $270.67M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLUNRBAFLY
P/E -14.3x 18.1x -8.7x
P/FCF -13.9x 8,277x -10.1x
P/Operating cash flow -20.7x 33.0x -12.5x
P/S 5.3x 1.4x 11.5x
P/B -9.0x 20.2x 2.7x
P/Tangible book -4.4x 25.1x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA -25.1x 13.1x -9.2x
EV/EBIT -19.1x 16.2x -7.9x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 1.7x 9.4x
EV/FCF -13.7x 9,853x -8.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -20.4x 39.3x -10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 0.31 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLUNRBAFLY
Revenue growth (1Y) 116.9% 17.5% 179.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 78.9% 7.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22,840% 906.6% 1,165%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 250.3% 9.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -104.8% 217.8% -51.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -65.7% 107.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 37.3% 177.7% -46.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -267.7% 67.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 60.7% 168.9% 89.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.3% 58.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -540.4% 208.0% -63.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -220.2% -12.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -366.8% 100.3% -77.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -75.0% -84.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLUNRBAFLY
Gross margin 17.0% 9.4% 22.9%
EBITDA margin -21.0% 12.7% -102.3%
Operating margin -27.5% 10.3% -118.0%
Pretax margin -36.9% 8.3% -139.6%
Net margin -26.8% 7.7% -129.1%
FCF margin -38.3% 0.0% -113.8%
Operating cash flow margin -25.8% 4.2% -92.1%
Return on equity – 121.0% -31.2%
Return on assets -10.3% 4.6% -23.2%
Return on invested capital -560.6% 18.2% -25.8%
Return on capital employed -9.6% 17.9% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.5x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 4.6% 0.5% 16.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLUNRBAFLY
Debt / assets 17.8% 26.9% 1.6%
Debt / equity -1.2x 7.0x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 2.1x 2.1x
Debt / FCF -1.8x 2,870x -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 115.4% 96.2% 25.4%
Equity / assets -15.4% 3.8% 74.6%
Interest coverage -10.0x 4.0x -18.2x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.1x 2.7x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.3x 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.2x 2.2x
Altman Z-score 0.72 1.47 3.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLUNRBAFLY
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -36.0%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -36.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLUNRBAFLY
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.63FY2026 $-0.99FY2026 $-1.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -183.2%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $951.52MFY2026 $91.05BFY2026 $464.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +353.0%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +190.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.8% +18.5% +41.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLUNRBAFLY
Held by institutions 63.2% 75.6% 57.0%
Institutions holding 328 2,627 267
Change in shares held, QoQ +34.5% +2.3% +46.3%
Institutions buying 223 1,328 211
Institutions selling 71 843 34
Buyers to sellers 3.14 1.58 6.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LUNRBAFLY
LUNR 1.00 0.24 0.69
BA 0.24 1.00 0.22
FLY 0.69 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LUNR, BA and FLY?

Boeing (BA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intuitive Machines (LUNR) $1.96B, Boeing (BA) $138.23B, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) $3.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

Firefly Aerospace (FLY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intuitive Machines (LUNR) +116.9%, Boeing (BA) +17.5%, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) +179.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Boeing (BA) has the highest net margin (Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -26.8%, Boeing (BA) 7.7%, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) -129.1%). On return on invested capital, Boeing (BA) leads (Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -560.6%, Boeing (BA) 18.2%, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) -25.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intuitive Machines (LUNR) returned the most: Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -6.2%, Boeing (BA) -25.2%, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) -23.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Boeing (BA) has been the steadiest (Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 110.2%, Boeing (BA) 36.2%, Firefly Aerospace (FLY) 106.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LUNR, BA and FLY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Boeing (BA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.