LU vs RGLD vs UPBD Stock Comparison

Lufax Holding, Royal Gold and Upbound Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.49 +584.7% 1M +156.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
1 win
RGLD Royal Gold Inc
$239.66 -5.1% 1M +35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.29B
P/E
27.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.55B
Div. yield
0.79%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
8 wins
UPBD Upbound Group, Inc.
$16.95 +5.3% 1M -27.2% 1Y
Market cap
$988.17M
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
9.20%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Royal Gold leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Royal Gold 8, Upbound 3, Lufax Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLURGLDUPBDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.36B $20.29B $988.17M RGLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -16.8x 27.5x 10.9x UPBD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 22.1x 3.9x UPBD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.7% +93.5% +5.9% RGLD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -34.1% 47.7% 1.9% RGLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.1% 9.7% 7.8% RGLD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x 0.8x RGLD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.79% 9.20% UPBD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +156.5% +35.0% -27.2% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.8%/yr +18.7%/yr -20.6%/yr RGLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 235.4% 41.1% 45.0% RGLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 68/100 63/100 RGLD

Percentile Scorecard

LURGLDUPBD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLURGLDUPBD
Valuation 41 #100 of 169 19 #138 of 169 96 #8 of 169
Growth 26 #118 of 160 92 #14 of 160 71 #47 of 160
Profitability 24 #114 of 149 95 #9 of 149 62 #57 of 149
Financial Health 40 #95 of 158 92 #13 of 158 53 #75 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 43 #78 of 136 31 #94 of 136
Overall 33 68 63
  • LU ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RGLD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UPBD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLURGLDUPBDSPY
1 month +584.7%-5.1%+5.3% -0.2%
3 months +447.7%+22.2%-21.5% +3.9%
6 months +346.8%+1.2%-11.1% +8.2%
Year to date +231.6%+7.8%-3.5% +12.9%
1 year +156.5%+35.0%-27.2% +12.3%
3 years +123.4%+124.9%-32.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +30.8%+31.0%-12.5% +23.3%
5 years -66.9%+135.8%-68.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.8%+18.7%-20.6% +10.9%
10 years —+260.0%+74.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+13.7%+5.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLURGLDUPBDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 235.4%41.1%45.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.0%41.4%46.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.071.491.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.660.85-0.60 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.2%-40.9%-72.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.1%-21.2%-28.2% -1.2%
52-week high $8.50$304.29$23.60 $779.14
52-week low $0.83$169.08$15.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLURGLDUPBD
P/E now vs peer median -16.8xmedian 11.1x 27.5xmedian 11.1x 10.9xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 2.6x 13.1xmedian 2.6x 0.2xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.5x 16.4xmedian 13.5x 1.4xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 7.0x 34,688xmedian 7.0x 2.8xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.7x 2.7xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.38median 0.32 0.78median 0.32 0.04median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLURGLDUPBD
Revenue $1.29B $1.55B $4.74B
Gross profit – $1.34B $2.33B
Operating income – $950.24M $241.70M
Net income -$381.02M $739.81M $90.34M
Free cash flow $747.06M $585.00K $355.95M
EPS (diluted) $-0.51 $8.68 $1.54
Cash & equivalents – $182.47M $105.30M
Total debt $9.62B $395.89M $5.98B
Shares (diluted) 866.69M 85.05M 58.71M
Enterprise value $2.04B $19.52B $556.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLURGLDUPBD
P/E -16.8x 27.5x 10.9x
P/FCF 9.8x 34,688x 2.8x
P/Operating cash flow 9.8x 19.4x 2.3x
P/S 5.7x 13.1x 0.2x
P/B 0.6x 2.7x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 2.7x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 16.4x 1.4x
EV/EBIT -60.5x 21.6x 9.5x
EV/Revenue 12.3x 13.3x 0.5x
EV/FCF 21.2x 35,053x 6.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.2x 19.6x 5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.38 0.78 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLURGLDUPBD
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.7% 93.5% 5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -41.4% 36.5% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 92.3% 8.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 37.9% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 83.7% -7.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 48.0% 23.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.8% 64.5% -11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -47.3% 47.6% 303.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.9% 27.1% -11.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -43.7% 35.5% 295.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.6% 84.2% 94.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.2% 36.3% 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.6% -99.8% 123.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.2% 26.0% 9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLURGLDUPBD
Gross margin – 86.9% 49.1%
EBITDA margin – 80.8% 35.5%
Operating margin – 61.4% 5.1%
Pretax margin -20.4% 58.8% 2.7%
Net margin -34.1% 47.7% 1.9%
FCF margin 58.1% 0.0% 7.5%
Operating cash flow margin 58.1% 67.5% 9.0%
Return on equity -3.3% 9.9% 12.5%
Return on assets -1.3% 7.9% 2.9%
Return on invested capital -1.1% 9.7% 7.8%
Return on capital employed – 10.2% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.0x 1.4x 4.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLURGLDUPBD
Debt / assets 32.3% 4.2% 45.9%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.1x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 12.9x 676.7x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 59.8% 19.2% 76.4%
Equity / assets 40.2% 80.8% 23.6%
Interest coverage -707.1x 19.2x 2.2x
Current ratio – 2.9x –
Quick ratio – 2.5x –
Cash ratio – 1.4x –
Altman Z-score – 7.48 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLURGLDUPBD
Dividend yield – 0.8% 9.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.8% 9.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 18.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23,897% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 25.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 13.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLURGLDUPBD
Forward P/E – 22.1xFY2026 3.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.19FY2026 $10.85FY2026 $4.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +48.0%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +24.1% +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.01BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026 $5.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +90.4%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.3% +4.5% -4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLURGLDUPBD
Held by institutions 8.1% 83.5% 99.3%
Institutions holding 75 762 256
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.0% +1.2% +3.3%
Institutions buying 31 378 146
Institutions selling 29 264 69
Buyers to sellers 1.07 1.43 2.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LURGLDUPBD
LU 1.00 -0.07 -0.03
RGLD -0.07 1.00 0.11
UPBD -0.03 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LU, RGLD and UPBD?

Royal Gold (RGLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lufax Holding (LU) $7.36B, Royal Gold (RGLD) $20.29B, Upbound (UPBD) $988.17M.

Which stock is cheaper, LU, RGLD and UPBD?

Upbound (UPBD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lufax Holding (LU) -16.8x, Royal Gold (RGLD) 27.5x, Upbound (UPBD) 10.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Upbound (UPBD) is cheapest (Royal Gold (RGLD) 22.1x, Upbound (UPBD) 3.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Royal Gold (RGLD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lufax Holding (LU) +7.7%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +93.5%, Upbound (UPBD) +5.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Royal Gold (RGLD) has the highest net margin (Lufax Holding (LU) -34.1%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 47.7%, Upbound (UPBD) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads (Lufax Holding (LU) -1.1%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 9.7%, Upbound (UPBD) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Lufax Holding (LU) +156.5%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +35.0%, Upbound (UPBD) -27.2%. Over five years, Royal Gold (RGLD) compounded fastest (Lufax Holding (LU) -19.8%/yr, Royal Gold (RGLD) +18.7%/yr, Upbound (UPBD) -20.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Upbound (UPBD) has the highest dividend yield: Lufax Holding (LU) 0.00%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 0.79%, Upbound (UPBD) 9.20%. Lufax Holding (LU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Royal Gold (RGLD) has been the steadiest (Lufax Holding (LU) 235.4%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 41.1%, Upbound (UPBD) 45.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LU, RGLD and UPBD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.