LTSV vs OMAB vs SHO Stock Comparison

Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV, Central North Airport and Sunstone Hotel Investors Prices as of Sep 11, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 5, Sunstone Hotel Investors 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLTSVOMABSHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.87M $4.95B $2.41B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.1x 16.7x 56.8x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.5x 49.8x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.7% — +7.3% SHO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.2% — 4.2% SHO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 5.28% 2.78% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -0.2% +42.6% SHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +16.2%/yr +1.0%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year — 31.4% 22.8% SHO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 46/100 73/100 SHO

Percentile Scorecard

LTSVOMABSHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLTSVOMABSHO
Valuation 26 #108 of 145 28 #98 of 136 90 #16 of 145
Growth 86 #21 of 143 – 59 #59 of 143
Profitability 8 #125 of 136 – 64 #50 of 136
Financial Health 4 #132 of 138 34 #93 of 140 91 #13 of 138
Shareholder Returns 78 #30 of 131 76 #20 of 80 59 #54 of 131
Overall 40 46 73
  • LTSV ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SHO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLTSVOMABSHOSPY
1 month -10.0%+3.7%+14.6% +0.7%
3 months -15.6%-5.2%+10.8% +3.7%
6 months -17.4%-3.3%+31.9% +7.1%
Year to date -10.0%-5.7%+44.9% +12.8%
1 year —-0.2%+42.6% +11.9%
3 years —+70.1%+38.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+19.4%+11.5% +22.8%
5 years —+111.9%+4.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year —+16.2%+1.0% +10.9%
10 years —+118.0%+4.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+8.1%+0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLTSVOMABSHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y —31.4%22.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —28.0%23.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y —1.100.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.011.87 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.3%-42.1%-41.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.4%-24.0%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $3.67$134.98$12.95 $779.14
52-week low $2.63$88.75$8.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLTSVOMABSHO
P/E now vs peer median -7.1xmedian 25.7x 16.7xmedian 16.5x 56.8xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.1x 5.6xmedian 0.9x 2.4xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 14.3x —median 8.8x 7.8xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.3xmedian 23.5x 12.2xmedian 11.9x 24.9xmedian 23.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 7.8xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.30median 1.86 —median 0.84 -3.03median 1.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLTSVOMABSHO
Revenue $30.33M – $1.00B
Gross profit $10.63M – $608.66M
Operating income -$14.09M – $262.94M
Net income -$3.43M – $53.12M
Free cash flow -$603.00K – $96.80M
EPS (diluted) $-0.38 – $0.23
Cash & equivalents $10.94M $172.32M $203.71M
Total debt – $746.90M $968.37M
Shares (diluted) 8.11M – 185.55M
Enterprise value -$7.94M $4.44B $1.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABSHO
P/E -7.1x 16.7x 56.8x
P/FCF -36.3x 12.2x 24.9x
P/Operating cash flow 62.7x – 12.1x
P/S 0.7x 5.6x 2.4x
P/B 1.0x 7.8x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.0x -10.0x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -1.2x – 7.8x
EV/EBIT -0.8x – 12.1x
EV/Revenue 0.4x – 3.2x
EV/FCF -18.1x – 32.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.3x – 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.30 – -3.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABSHO
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.7% – 7.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.4% – 7.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.7% – 8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.7% – 45.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 49.2% – 164.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.6% – 917.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.4% – -18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 155.1% – 18.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% – -4.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 66.4% – 318.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.1% – -4.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABSHO
Gross margin 35.1% – 60.7%
EBITDA margin -30.1% – 40.4%
Operating margin -46.5% – 26.2%
Pretax margin -78.8% – 5.3%
Net margin -10.2% – 4.2%
FCF margin -2.0% – 9.7%
Operating cash flow margin 1.2% – 19.8%
Return on equity -15.4% – 2.8%
Return on assets -2.5% – 1.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x – 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABSHO
Debt / assets – 43.4% 31.9%
Debt / equity – 1.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.9x
Debt / FCF – – 10.0x
Liabilities / assets 83.8% 63.1% 38.0%
Equity / assets 16.2% 36.9% 62.0%
Interest coverage -1.4x – 5.2x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABSHO
Dividend yield – 5.3% 2.8%
Net buyback yield 3.5% – 3.0%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 5.3% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLTSVOMABSHO
Forward P/E – 15.5xFY2026 49.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.60FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 +550.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% -11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $933.64MFY2026 $966.48MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.1%FY2026 +0.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.6% -7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLTSVOMABSHO
Held by institutions – 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 163 273
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4% +2.6%
Institutions buying – 77 136
Institutions selling – 59 97
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LTSVOMABSHO
LTSV – – –
OMAB – 1.00 0.22
SHO – 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LTSV, OMAB and SHO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) $21.87M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.95B, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) $2.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, LTSV, OMAB and SHO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -7.1x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.7x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 56.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.5x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 49.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -0.7%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +7.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) has the highest net margin (Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -10.2%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -0.2%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +42.6%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.2%/yr, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +1.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.28%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 2.78%. Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.4%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 22.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LTSV, OMAB and SHO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.