LTSV vs OMAB vs RLJ Stock Comparison

Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV, Central North Airport and RLJ Lodging Trust Prices as of Sep 11, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RLJ RLJ Lodging Trust
$12.45 +11.3% 1M +76.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.89B
P/E
762.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.38B
Div. yield
0.05%
Hotel REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

RLJ Lodging Trust leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (RLJ Lodging Trust 5, Central North Airport 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLTSVOMABRLJLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.87M $4.71B $1.89B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.1x 16.1x 762.8x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.0x 415.0x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.7% — +1.1% RLJ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.2% — 0.2% RLJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 5.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -3.4% +76.3% RLJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.3%/yr -3.0%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year — 31.1% 28.2% RLJ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 46/100 57/100 RLJ

Percentile Scorecard

LTSVOMABRLJ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLTSVOMABRLJ
Valuation 19 #117 of 145 30 #96 of 136 92 #12 of 145
Growth 86 #20 of 141 – 21 #112 of 141
Profitability 8 #123 of 134 – 49 #69 of 134
Financial Health 4 #133 of 138 35 #94 of 143 40 #83 of 138
Shareholder Returns 79 #29 of 131 74 #22 of 82 81 #26 of 131
Overall 39 46 57
  • LTSV ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RLJ ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLTSVOMABRLJSPY
1 month -10.0%-3.9%+11.3% -0.2%
3 months -15.6%-8.5%+0.1% +3.9%
6 months -17.4%-6.4%+53.7% +8.2%
Year to date -10.0%-8.9%+67.1% +12.9%
1 year —-3.4%+76.3% +12.3%
3 years —+74.5%+36.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+20.4%+10.9% +23.3%
5 years —+103.7%-14.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+15.3%-3.0% +10.9%
10 years —+105.1%-37.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+7.4%-4.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLTSVOMABRLJSPY
Volatility, 1Y —31.1%28.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —28.1%27.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y —1.120.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.112.71 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.3%-42.1%-60.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.4%-26.6%-0.2% -1.2%
52-week high $3.67$134.98$12.48 $779.14
52-week low $2.63$88.75$6.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLTSVOMABRLJ
P/E now vs peer median -7.1xmedian 26.3x 16.1xmedian 16.3x 754.6xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.0x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 1.4xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 14.4x —median 8.7x 10.8xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.3xmedian 23.3x 11.8xmedian 11.4x 10.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 0.9xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.30median 1.91 —median 0.82 -11.96median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLTSVOMABRLJ
Revenue $30.33M – $1.38B
Gross profit $10.63M – –
Operating income -$14.09M – –
Net income -$3.43M – $27.66M
Free cash flow -$603.00K – $173.52M
EPS (diluted) $-0.38 – $0.02
Cash & equivalents $10.94M $172.32M $937.60M
Total debt – $1.84B $2.70B
Shares (diluted) 8.11M – 150.93M
Enterprise value -$7.94M $4.19B -$189.38M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABRLJ
P/E -7.1x 16.1x 754.6x
P/FCF -36.3x 11.8x 10.9x
P/Operating cash flow 62.7x – 7.1x
P/S 0.7x 5.4x 1.4x
P/B 1.0x 7.5x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 1.0x -9.6x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA -1.2x – 10.8x
EV/EBIT -0.8x – 25.9x
EV/Revenue 0.4x – 2.6x
EV/FCF -18.1x – 21.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.3x – 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.30 – -11.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABRLJ
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.7% – 1.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 49.2% – -52.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – -28.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.6% – -92.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.4% – -63.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 155.1% – -0.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% – -1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 66.4% – 41.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.1% – 29.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABRLJ
Gross margin 35.1% – –
EBITDA margin -30.1% – 24.4%
Operating margin -46.5% – –
Pretax margin -78.8% – 2.1%
Net margin -10.2% – 0.2%
FCF margin -2.0% – 12.6%
Operating cash flow margin 1.2% – 19.3%
Return on equity -15.4% – 1.3%
Return on assets -2.5% – 0.6%
Return on invested capital – – 3.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x – 9.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABRLJ
Debt / assets – 43.4% 51.5%
Debt / equity – 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 5.2x
Debt / FCF – – 15.5x
Liabilities / assets 83.8% 63.1% 58.6%
Equity / assets 16.2% 36.9% 41.4%
Interest coverage -1.4x – 1.3x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLTSVOMABRLJ
Dividend yield – 5.5% 4.8%
Net buyback yield 3.5% – 1.5%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 5.5% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 330.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 52.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 43.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLTSVOMABRLJ
Forward P/E – 15.0xFY2026 415.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.60FY2026 $0.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 +200.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% +33.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $933.64MFY2026 $1.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.1%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.6% +15.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLTSVOMABRLJ
Held by institutions – 12.3% 93.3%
Institutions holding – 163 223
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4% +8.6%
Institutions buying – 77 118
Institutions selling – 59 75
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LTSVOMABRLJ
LTSV – – –
OMAB – 1.00 0.27
RLJ – 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LTSV, OMAB and RLJ?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) $21.87M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.71B, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) $1.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, LTSV, OMAB and RLJ?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -7.1x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 762.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 415.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -0.7%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +1.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has the highest net margin (Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -10.2%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.4%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +76.3%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.3%/yr, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) -3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 0.05%. Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) and Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 28.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LTSV, OMAB and RLJ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.