LTH vs OSW vs XPOF Stock Comparison

Life Time Group Holdings, Onespaworld Holdings and Xponential Fitness Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OSW ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd
$31.29 +36.5% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.13B
P/E
37.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.03B
Div. yield
0.64%
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
XPOF Xponential Fitness, Inc.
$4.53 -2.4% 1M -29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$191.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$288.47M
Div. yield
–
Fitness Clubs Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Life Time Group Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Life Time Group Holdings 6, Onespaworld Holdings 4, Xponential Fitness 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLTHOSWXPOFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.64B $3.13B $191.15M LTH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.2x 37.4x -4.3x LTH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.0x 28.2x 18.9x XPOF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.0% +9.8% -9.0% LTH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.7% 8.3% -15.2% LTH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.6% 13.7% 13.2% OSW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.3x 17.3x OSW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.64% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +81.0% +38.9% -29.8% LTH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.6%/yr +20.7%/yr -24.6%/yr OSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.3% 37.2% 93.4% OSW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 49/100 23/100 LTH

Percentile Scorecard

LTHOSWXPOF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLTHOSWXPOF
Valuation 41 #27 of 45 15 #29 of 34 27 #33 of 45
Growth 86 #7 of 43 77 #8 of 32 19 #35 of 43
Profitability 66 #15 of 42 43 #18 of 31 39 #26 of 42
Financial Health 68 #16 of 48 85 #7 of 40 6 #45 of 48
Shareholder Returns 14 #25 of 29 25 #13 of 17 –
Overall 55 49 23
  • LTH ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • OSW ranked among 40 companies in Consumer Services
  • XPOF ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLTHOSWXPOFSPY
1 month +18.2%+36.5%-2.4% -1.0%
3 months +4.7%+17.6%-32.5% -0.4%
6 months +41.1%+23.6%-31.7% +4.5%
Year to date +78.3%+50.9%-45.0% +12.4%
1 year +81.0%+38.9%-29.8% +13.6%
3 years +269.7%+184.7%-68.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year +54.7%+41.8%-31.7% +20.8%
5 years +144.3%+156.1%-75.6% +63.7%
5 years, per year +19.6%+20.7%-24.6% +10.4%

Risk

MeasureLTHOSWXPOFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.3%37.2%93.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%35.5%113.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.790.971.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.171.05-0.32 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.4%-45.0%-89.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%0.0%-49.7% -1.6%
52-week high $47.39$31.29$9.00 $779.14
52-week low $24.66$19.37$3.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLTHOSWXPOF
P/E now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 18.6x 37.4xmedian 12.6x -4.3xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.9x 3.0xmedian 1.1x 0.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 10.9x 26.1xmedian 8.5x 24.1xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -51.6xmedian 12.0x 33.2xmedian 11.1x -23.7xmedian 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.5x 5.5xmedian 1.9x -0.5xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.32median 0.60 0.15median 0.29 -0.35median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLTHOSWXPOF
Revenue $3.29B $1.03B $288.47M
Gross profit $1.58B $175.67M $237.58M
Operating income $572.08M $93.70M $17.90M
Net income $418.95M $84.85M -$58.01M
Free cash flow -$206.21M $94.26M -$8.08M
EPS (diluted) $1.84 $0.83 $-1.05
Cash & equivalents $286.21M $32.14M $24.99M
Total debt $1.49B $70.52M $514.77M
Shares (diluted) 227.34M 101.86M 42.03M
Enterprise value $9.81B $3.03B $2.70M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLTHOSWXPOF
P/E 25.2x 37.4x -4.3x
P/FCF -51.6x 33.2x -23.7x
P/Operating cash flow 11.7x 29.0x -33.2x
P/S 3.2x 3.0x 0.7x
P/B 3.1x 5.5x -0.5x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 43.4x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA 13.1x 26.1x 24.1x
EV/EBIT 20.7x 33.8x 38.0x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 3.1x 2.4x
EV/FCF -57.5x 33.6x -84.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.0x 29.3x -118.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.32 0.15 -0.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLTHOSWXPOF
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.0% 9.8% -9.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 10.2% 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.4% 12.5% -2.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 12.2% 1.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.4% 13.6% 152.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% 21.5% -5.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.6% 14.7% 29.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 85.1% 248.8% -179.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 44.7% 16.7% 36.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 78.6% 248.2% 12.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% 35.0% -140.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.8% 25.9% -28.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -392.5% 41.2% -176.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.2% 23.7% -29.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLTHOSWXPOF
Gross margin 47.9% 17.1% 82.4%
EBITDA margin 27.4% 11.8% 9.8%
Operating margin 17.4% 9.1% 6.2%
Pretax margin 17.3% 8.6% -19.9%
Net margin 12.7% 8.3% -15.2%
FCF margin -6.3% 9.2% -2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 27.6% 10.5% -2.0%
Return on equity 12.4% 14.7% –
Return on assets 4.9% 11.7% -18.4%
Return on invested capital 8.6% 13.7% 13.2%
Return on capital employed 7.3% 14.3% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 1.3x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.0% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLTHOSWXPOF
Debt / assets 17.4% 9.8% 166.1%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.1x -1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.3x 17.3x
Debt / FCF -7.2x 0.7x -63.7x
Liabilities / assets 59.8% 20.9% 221.4%
Equity / assets 40.2% 79.1% -121.4%
Interest coverage – 18.2x 0.3x
Current ratio 0.7x 2.2x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.8x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.86 14.07 -2.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLTHOSWXPOF
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 1.8% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLTHOSWXPOF
Forward P/E 28.0xFY2026 28.2xFY2026 18.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.69FY2026 $1.11FY2026 $0.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.0% +10.8% +108.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.57BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026 $240.09MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.1%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 -23.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.7% +7.9% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLTHOSWXPOF
Held by institutions 91.3% 100.0% 69.2%
Institutions holding 374 260 118
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% -0.5% +8.3%
Institutions buying 235 146 68
Institutions selling 104 79 30
Buyers to sellers 2.26 1.85 2.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LTHOSWXPOF
LTH 1.00 0.31 0.14
OSW 0.31 1.00 0.16
XPOF 0.14 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry
LTH · Fitness Clubs

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LTH, OSW and XPOF?

Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) $10.64B, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) $3.13B, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) $191.15M.

Which stock is cheaper, LTH, OSW and XPOF?

Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) 25.2x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 37.4x, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) -4.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) is cheapest (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) 28.0x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 28.2x, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) 18.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) +13.0%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +9.8%, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) -9.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) has the highest net margin (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) 12.7%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 8.3%, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) -15.2%). On return on invested capital, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) leads (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) 8.6%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 13.7%, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) 13.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) returned the most: Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) +81.0%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +38.9%, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) -29.8%. Over five years, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) compounded fastest (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) +19.6%/yr, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +20.7%/yr, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) -24.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 0.64%. Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) and Xponential Fitness (XPOF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) has been the steadiest (Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) 37.3%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 37.2%, Xponential Fitness (XPOF) 93.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LTH, OSW and XPOF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.