LSTR vs CYRX vs GXO Stock Comparison

Landstar System, Cryoport and GXO Logistics Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$141.37 -16.1% 1M +13.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.77B
P/E
29.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29B
Div. yield
2.57%
Logistics Industrials
7 wins
CYRX Cryoport, Inc.
$18.29 +5.6% 1M +97.9% 1Y
Market cap
$926.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$186.45M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc.
$49.91 +11.5% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$5.73B
P/E
43.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.64B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Landstar System leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Landstar System 7, GXO Logistics 2, Cryoport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLSTRCYRXGXOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.77B $926.36M $5.73B GXO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.9x -20.3x 43.8x LSTR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.0x — 16.1x GXO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.7% +12.1% +7.6% CYRX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.0% -24.3% 1.0% LSTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.9% -5.8% 3.3% LSTR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 16.6x 3.1x LSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.57% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.6% +97.9% -7.6% CYRX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.3%/yr -25.9%/yr -10.9%/yr LSTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.1% 46.2% 40.7% LSTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 30/100 36/100 LSTR

Percentile Scorecard

LSTRCYRXGXO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLSTRCYRXGXO
Valuation 26 #101 of 136 5 #129 of 136 38 #85 of 136
Growth 24 #92 of 121 51 #60 of 121 75 #31 of 121
Profitability 56 #50 of 112 10 #101 of 112 29 #80 of 112
Financial Health 86 #21 of 140 62 #54 of 140 20 #112 of 140
Shareholder Returns 63 #30 of 80 23 #62 of 80 20 #64 of 80
Overall 51 30 36
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CYRX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLSTRCYRXGXOSPY
1 month -16.1%+5.6%+11.5% +0.7%
3 months -16.5%+19.3%-1.1% +3.7%
6 months -23.2%+78.3%-12.6% +7.1%
Year to date -1.6%+90.5%-5.2% +12.8%
1 year +13.6%+97.9%-7.6% +11.9%
3 years -14.2%+95.8%-1.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -5.0%+25.1%-0.4% +22.8%
5 years -19.6%-77.6%-43.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -4.3%-25.9%-10.9% +10.9%
10 years +100.5%+810.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +7.2%+24.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLSTRCYRXGXOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.1%46.2%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%40.4%44.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.671.601.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.342.12-0.19 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.2%-94.4%-69.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.3%-1.9%-23.9% -1.2%
52-week high $225.37$18.64$65.59 $779.14
52-week low $121.51$7.72$44.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLSTRCYRXGXO
P/E now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 16.5x -20.3xmedian 16.5x 43.8xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 5.0xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 8.8x -56.5xmedian 8.8x 10.2xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 11.9x -46.2xmedian 11.9x 31.8xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.74median 0.84 -9.77median 0.84 -3.62median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLSTRCYRXGXO
Revenue $5.29B $186.45M $13.64B
Gross profit – $87.77M $2.08B
Operating income $214.56M -$39.62M $328.00M
Net income $160.38M -$37.39M $139.00M
Free cash flow $157.62M -$20.03M $180.00M
R&D – $17.75M –
EPS (diluted) $4.73 $-0.90 $1.13
Cash & equivalents $297.32M $269.27M $769.00M
Total debt $68.71M $186.83M $3.20B
Shares (diluted) 33.87M 50.44M 115.72M
Enterprise value $3.20B -$706.49M $3.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLSTRCYRXGXO
P/E 29.9x -20.3x 43.8x
P/FCF 30.2x -46.2x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 27.8x 116.2x 11.3x
P/S 0.9x 5.0x 0.4x
P/B 5.7x 1.9x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 5.7x 2.6x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x -56.5x 10.2x
EV/EBIT 20.9x -18.1x 24.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 3.8x 0.6x
EV/FCF 28.4x -35.8x 45.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.2x 89.9x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.74 -9.77 -3.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLSTRCYRXGXO
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.7% 12.1% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% -8.2% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.1% 9.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% 7.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.3% 7.8% 52.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -18.3% 5.7% 4.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.8% -147.3% 107.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.8% 1.1% -11.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.3% -163.7% 106.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -17.2% 2.1% -12.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -19.6% 147.7% 22.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.5% 33.4% 4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.7% 40.6% 93.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.5% 10.5% 20.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLSTRCYRXGXO
Gross margin – 47.1% 15.3%
EBITDA margin 4.8% -6.8% 5.9%
Operating margin 4.1% -21.2% 2.4%
Pretax margin 4.0% -16.6% 1.6%
Net margin 3.0% -24.3% 1.0%
FCF margin 3.0% -10.7% 1.3%
Operating cash flow margin 3.2% 4.3% 3.7%
Return on equity 19.2% -7.6% 4.5%
Return on assets 9.0% -4.9% 1.1%
Return on invested capital 17.9% -5.8% 3.3%
Return on capital employed 21.3% -7.4% 4.0%
Asset turnover 3.0x 0.2x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.2x 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 5.2% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLSTRCYRXGXO
Debt / assets 3.8% 24.7% 25.9%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.4x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 16.6x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 0.4x -9.3x 17.8x
Liabilities / assets 54.1% 35.1% 75.6%
Equity / assets 45.9% 64.9% 24.4%
Interest coverage 111.1x -18.8x 2.5x
Current ratio 1.8x 2.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.7x 2.0x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 8.93 1.24 1.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLSTRCYRXGXO
Dividend yield 2.6% – –
Net buyback yield 2.1% 0.4% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 4.7% 0.4% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLSTRCYRXGXO
Forward P/E 23.0xFY2026 – 16.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.15FY2026 $-0.77FY2026 $3.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +85.8%FY2026 -155.0%FY2026 +23.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.8% – +9.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.45BFY2026 $201.00MFY2026 $13.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.1%FY2026 +14.1%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +0.4% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLSTRCYRXGXO
Held by institutions 100.0% 89.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 544 184 480
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% -1.6% +5.8%
Institutions buying 297 102 237
Institutions selling 153 49 153
Buyers to sellers 1.94 2.08 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LSTRCYRXGXO
LSTR 1.00 0.21 0.28
CYRX 0.21 1.00 0.30
GXO 0.28 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LSTR, CYRX and GXO?

GXO Logistics (GXO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Landstar System (LSTR) $4.77B, Cryoport (CYRX) $926.36M, GXO Logistics (GXO) $5.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, LSTR, CYRX and GXO?

Landstar System (LSTR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Landstar System (LSTR) 29.9x, Cryoport (CYRX) -20.3x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 43.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, GXO Logistics (GXO) is cheapest (Landstar System (LSTR) 23.0x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 16.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cryoport (CYRX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Landstar System (LSTR) +10.7%, Cryoport (CYRX) +12.1%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest net margin (Landstar System (LSTR) 3.0%, Cryoport (CYRX) -24.3%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 1.0%). On return on invested capital, Landstar System (LSTR) leads (Landstar System (LSTR) 17.9%, Cryoport (CYRX) -5.8%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cryoport (CYRX) returned the most: Landstar System (LSTR) +13.6%, Cryoport (CYRX) +97.9%, GXO Logistics (GXO) -7.6%. Over five years, Landstar System (LSTR) compounded fastest (Landstar System (LSTR) -4.3%/yr, Cryoport (CYRX) -25.9%/yr, GXO Logistics (GXO) -10.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Landstar System (LSTR) 2.57%. Cryoport (CYRX) and GXO Logistics (GXO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Landstar System (LSTR) has been the steadiest (Landstar System (LSTR) 40.1%, Cryoport (CYRX) 46.2%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LSTR, CYRX and GXO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Landstar System (LSTR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.