LSCC vs ARM vs QCOM Stock Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor, Arm Holdings and Qualcomm Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$210.33 -36.8% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$236.92B
P/E
226.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
1 win
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$175.91 -10.8% 1M +3.5% 1Y
Market cap
$189.99B
P/E
20.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 5, Lattice Semiconductor 3, Arm Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLSCCARMQCOMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.49B $236.92B $189.99B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 371.3x 226.9x 20.5x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.3x 101.1x 16.3x QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% +25.1% +1.9% LSCC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.6% 20.2% 21.0% QCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 29.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.2% +26.2% +3.5% LSCC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.0%/yr — +6.0%/yr LSCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.3% 78.8% 54.0% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 63/100 65/100 QCOM

Percentile Scorecard

LSCCARMQCOM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLSCCARMQCOM
Valuation 19 #77 of 95 7 #88 of 95 81 #19 of 95
Growth 40 #56 of 93 88 #12 of 93 34 #62 of 93
Profitability 64 #33 of 91 77 #22 of 91 88 #12 of 91
Financial Health 61 #40 of 102 78 #23 of 102 43 #59 of 102
Shareholder Returns 60 #31 of 76 – 80 #16 of 76
Overall 49 63 65
  • LSCC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • QCOM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLSCCARMQCOMSPY
1 month -20.9%-36.8%-10.8% -1.0%
3 months -25.1%-19.1%+5.4% +2.9%
6 months -21.7%-10.4%+18.2% +6.4%
Year to date +30.7%+92.4%+2.8% +11.4%
1 year +38.2%+26.2%+3.5% +13.1%
3 years +32.1%+301.6%+60.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +9.7%+59.0%+17.2% +21.5%
5 years +40.3%—+33.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.0%—+6.0% +10.9%
10 years +1,396.0%—+159.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +31.1%—+10.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureLSCCARMQCOMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.3%78.8%54.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.1%71.2%52.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.063.452.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.610.330.06 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.1%-54.0%-45.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.0%-52.1%-29.9% -2.5%
52-week high $155.27$439.46$251.02 $779.14
52-week low $61.73$104.55$124.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLSCCARMQCOM
P/E now vs peer median 362.9xmedian 41.5x 213.8xmedian 41.5x 20.1xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 6.9x 43.3xmedian 6.9x 4.2xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 153.4xmedian 27.3x 189.4xmedian 27.3x 15.3xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.3xmedian 35.6x 110.9xmedian 35.6x 17.9xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 4.2x 25.9xmedian 4.2x 6.7xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median -8.27median 2.31 6.03median 2.31 4.83median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLSCCARMQCOM
Revenue $651.12M $5.16B $44.07B
Gross profit $449.43M $5.03B $23.90B
Operating income $47.97M $877.00M $10.22B
Net income $36.33M $1.04B $9.26B
Free cash flow $199.01M $2.01B $10.42B
R&D $218.13M $2.96B $9.89B
EPS (diluted) $0.26 $0.98 $8.66
Cash & equivalents $173.31M $3.06B $4.53B
Total debt – – $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 140.23M 1.07B 1.07B
Enterprise value $12.92B $222.63B $149.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLSCCARMQCOM
P/E 362.9x 213.8x 20.1x
P/FCF 66.3x 110.9x 17.9x
P/Operating cash flow 54.3x 106.6x 15.0x
P/S 20.3x 43.3x 4.2x
P/B 16.8x 25.9x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 17.2x 26.5x 7.1x
EV/EBITDA 153.4x 189.4x 15.3x
EV/EBIT 271.5x 250.0x 17.6x
EV/Revenue 20.0x 42.5x 4.1x
EV/FCF 65.4x 109.0x 17.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 53.5x 104.7x 14.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.27 6.03 4.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLSCCARMQCOM
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% 25.1% 1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.4% 24.7% 4.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.9% 25.6% -0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 25.4% 3.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 585.5% 14.9% -15.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -39.3% 21.6% 0.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 14.8% 49.4% -20.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.8% 37.2% 2.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 48.7% -17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -43.9% 35.5% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 52.2% 105.5% -2.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 34.7% 12.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 48.9% 121.8% -10.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.4% 33.3% 14.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLSCCARMQCOM
Gross margin 69.0% 97.5% 54.2%
EBITDA margin 13.0% 22.5% 26.8%
Operating margin 7.4% 17.0% 23.2%
Pretax margin 6.9% 24.5% 25.4%
Net margin 5.6% 20.2% 21.0%
FCF margin 30.6% 39.0% 23.6%
Operating cash flow margin 37.4% 40.6% 28.1%
Return on equity 4.8% 16.3% 33.7%
Return on assets 3.9% 12.6% 16.2%
Return on invested capital – – 29.1%
Return on capital employed 6.1% 9.0% 22.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.7x 2.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 18.7% 22.4% 7.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLSCCARMQCOM
Debt / assets – – 4.3%
Debt / equity – – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.5x
Debt / FCF – – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 19.3% 22.9% 51.8%
Equity / assets 80.7% 77.1% 48.2%
Interest coverage – – 14.8x
Current ratio 3.0x 5.3x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.0x 4.9x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.2x 3.2x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 43.52 54.04 6.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLSCCARMQCOM
Dividend yield – – 2.1%
Net buyback yield 0.3% – 4.7%
Shareholder yield 0.3% – 6.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 36.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLSCCARMQCOM
Forward P/E 43.3xFY2026 101.1xFY2026 16.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.22FY2026 $2.08FY2026 $10.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +111.4%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.4% +51.0% -2.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $859.93MFY2026 $5.70BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +64.3%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.0% +38.5% -5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLSCCARMQCOM
Held by institutions 100.0% 9.3% 79.7%
Institutions holding 604 955 3,029
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.5% +12.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 354 593 1,416
Institutions selling 181 257 1,332
Buyers to sellers 1.96 2.31 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LSCCARMQCOM
LSCC 1.00 0.58 0.45
ARM 0.58 1.00 0.48
QCOM 0.45 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LSCC, ARM and QCOM?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) $13.49B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $236.92B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $189.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, LSCC, ARM and QCOM?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 371.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 226.9x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 43.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 101.1x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 16.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +33.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +25.1%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest net margin (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 5.6%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 20.2%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) returned the most: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +38.2%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +26.2%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +3.5%. Over five years, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) compounded fastest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +7.0%/yr, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 0.00%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%. Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) and Arm Holdings (ARM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 62.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 78.8%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 54.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LSCC, ARM and QCOM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.