LSCC vs ARM vs MRVL Stock Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor, Arm Holdings and Marvell Technology Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$210.33 -36.8% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$236.92B
P/E
226.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$228.51 -12.4% 1M +176.1% 1Y
Market cap
$209.82B
P/E
79.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Marvell Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Marvell Technology 4, Lattice Semiconductor 3, Arm Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLSCCARMMRVLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.49B $236.92B $209.82B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 371.3x 226.9x 79.5x MRVL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.3x 101.1x 55.5x LSCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% +25.1% +30.6% LSCC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.6% 20.2% 27.9% MRVL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.2% +26.2% +176.1% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.0%/yr — +28.1%/yr MRVL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.3% 78.8% 79.1% LSCC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 63/100 50/100 ARM

Percentile Scorecard

LSCCARMMRVL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLSCCARMMRVL
Valuation 19 #77 of 95 7 #88 of 95 26 #71 of 95
Growth 40 #56 of 93 88 #12 of 93 90 #10 of 93
Profitability 64 #33 of 91 77 #22 of 91 60 #37 of 91
Financial Health 61 #40 of 102 78 #23 of 102 50 #52 of 102
Shareholder Returns 60 #31 of 76 – 25 #57 of 76
Overall 49 63 50
  • LSCC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLSCCARMMRVLSPY
1 month -20.9%-36.8%-12.4% -1.0%
3 months -25.1%-19.1%+17.6% +2.9%
6 months -21.7%-10.4%+39.1% +6.4%
Year to date +30.7%+92.4%+168.9% +11.4%
1 year +38.2%+26.2%+176.1% +13.1%
3 years +32.1%+301.6%+361.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +9.7%+59.0%+66.6% +21.5%
5 years +40.3%—+244.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.0%—+28.1% +10.9%
10 years +1,396.0%—+1,671.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +31.1%—+33.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureLSCCARMMRVLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.3%78.8%79.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.1%71.2%74.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.063.453.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.610.332.23 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.1%-54.0%-62.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.0%-52.1%-27.8% -2.5%
52-week high $155.27$439.46$316.43 $779.14
52-week low $61.73$104.55$73.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLSCCARMMRVL
P/E now vs peer median 362.9xmedian 41.5x 213.8xmedian 41.5x 77.7xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 6.9x 43.3xmedian 6.9x 21.2xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 153.4xmedian 27.3x 189.4xmedian 27.3x 71.4xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.3xmedian 35.6x 110.9xmedian 35.6x 115.8xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 4.2x 25.9xmedian 4.2x 10.8xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median -8.27median 2.31 6.03median 2.31 0.75median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLSCCARMMRVL
Revenue $651.12M $5.16B $9.45B
Gross profit $449.43M $5.03B $4.93B
Operating income $47.97M $877.00M $1.56B
Net income $36.33M $1.04B $2.64B
Free cash flow $199.01M $2.01B $1.73B
R&D $218.13M $2.96B $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $0.26 $0.98 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $173.31M $3.06B $3.93B
Total debt – – $4.96B
Shares (diluted) 140.23M 1.07B 921.20M
Enterprise value $12.92B $222.63B $196.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLSCCARMMRVL
P/E 362.9x 213.8x 77.7x
P/FCF 66.3x 110.9x 115.8x
P/Operating cash flow 54.3x 106.6x 91.1x
P/S 20.3x 43.3x 21.2x
P/B 16.8x 25.9x 10.8x
P/Tangible book 17.2x 26.5x 12.4x
EV/EBITDA 153.4x 189.4x 71.4x
EV/EBIT 271.5x 250.0x 129.0x
EV/Revenue 20.0x 42.5x 21.3x
EV/FCF 65.4x 109.0x 116.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 53.5x 104.7x 91.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.27 6.03 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLSCCARMMRVL
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% 25.1% 30.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.4% 24.7% 18.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.9% 25.6% 52.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 25.4% 25.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 585.5% 14.9% 1,577%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -39.3% 21.6% 100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 14.8% 49.4% 2,653%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.8% 37.2% 107.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 48.7% 2,512%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -43.9% 35.5% 104.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 52.2% 105.5% 19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 34.7% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 48.9% 121.8% 12.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.4% 33.3% 30.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLSCCARMMRVL
Gross margin 69.0% 97.5% 52.2%
EBITDA margin 13.0% 22.5% 29.9%
Operating margin 7.4% 17.0% 16.5%
Pretax margin 6.9% 24.5% 32.4%
Net margin 5.6% 20.2% 27.9%
FCF margin 30.6% 39.0% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin 37.4% 40.6% 23.3%
Return on equity 4.8% 16.3% 14.4%
Return on assets 3.9% 12.6% 9.7%
Return on invested capital – – 5.8%
Return on capital employed 6.1% 9.0% 6.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.7x 2.0x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 18.7% 22.4% 8.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLSCCARMMRVL
Debt / assets – – 18.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 19.3% 22.9% 32.7%
Equity / assets 80.7% 77.1% 67.3%
Interest coverage – – 7.2x
Current ratio 3.0x 5.3x 3.2x
Quick ratio 2.0x 4.9x 2.5x
Cash ratio 1.2x 3.2x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 43.52 54.04 14.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLSCCARMMRVL
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield 0.3% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.3% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLSCCARMMRVL
Forward P/E 43.3xFY2026 101.1xFY2026 55.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.22FY2026 $2.08FY2026 $4.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +111.4%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.4% +51.0% +83.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $859.93MFY2026 $5.70BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +64.3%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.0% +38.5% +80.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLSCCARMMRVL
Held by institutions 100.0% 9.3% 78.7%
Institutions holding 604 955 2,214
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.5% +12.4% +0.1%
Institutions buying 354 593 1,430
Institutions selling 181 257 646
Buyers to sellers 1.96 2.31 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LSCCARMMRVL
LSCC 1.00 0.58 0.60
ARM 0.58 1.00 0.61
MRVL 0.60 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LSCC, ARM and MRVL?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) $13.49B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $236.92B, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $209.82B.

Which stock is cheaper, LSCC, ARM and MRVL?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 371.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 226.9x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) is cheapest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 43.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 101.1x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 55.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +33.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +25.1%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) has the highest net margin (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 5.6%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 20.2%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +38.2%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +26.2%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +176.1%. Over five years, Marvell Technology (MRVL) compounded fastest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +7.0%/yr, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) has been the steadiest (Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 62.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 78.8%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LSCC, ARM and MRVL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marvell Technology (MRVL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.