LRCX vs MKSI vs ASML Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Mks and Asml Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$253.82 -19.3% 1M +63.1% 1Y
Market cap
$317.06B
P/E
37.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.44%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
MKSI Mks Inc
$218.24 -15.5% 1M +55.4% 1Y
Market cap
$14.75B
P/E
33.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.35B
Div. yield
0.44%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,662.85 -6.1% 1M +58.0% 1Y
Market cap
$640.89B
P/E
59.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.67%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Asml Holding 3, Mks 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXMKSIASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $317.06B $14.75B $640.89B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.6x 33.5x 59.1x MKSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 16.2x 34.9x MKSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +16.3% +22.9% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 10.1% 29.1% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% 8.9% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 3.2x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.44% 0.44% 0.67% ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +63.1% +55.4% +58.0% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.1%/yr +7.8%/yr +15.4%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.8% 61.8% 46.8% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 56/100 47/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXMKSIASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXMKSIASML
Valuation 50 #48 of 94 76 #23 of 94 17 #78 of 94
Growth 85 #15 of 92 73 #26 of 92 82 #17 of 92
Profitability 96 #5 of 90 65 #32 of 90 80 #19 of 90
Financial Health 44 #56 of 99 1 #98 of 99 14 #85 of 99
Shareholder Returns 61 #29 of 73 65 #26 of 73 43 #42 of 73
Overall 67 56 47
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MKSI ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXMKSIASMLSPY
1 month -19.3%-15.5%-6.1% +0.9%
3 months +0.6%-15.3%+7.2% +5.9%
6 months +2.0%-17.8%+19.3% +8.5%
Year to date +48.3%+36.6%+55.4% +13.3%
1 year +63.1%+55.4%+58.0% +12.4%
3 years +334.6%+224.9%+181.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +63.2%+48.2%+41.3% +23.5%
5 years +350.4%+45.4%+104.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +35.1%+7.8%+15.4% +11.0%
10 years +2,538.5%+339.6%+1,476.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +38.7%+16.0%+31.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLRCXMKSIASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.8%61.8%46.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%66.1%46.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.262.822.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.960.901.24 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-67.5%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.4%-50.9%-16.4% -0.9%
52-week high $433.33$444.80$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$137.20$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXMKSIASML
P/E now vs peer median 37.6xmedian 46.0x 33.5xmedian 46.0x 59.1xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 7.9x 3.4xmedian 7.9x 17.0xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 28.3x 17.3xmedian 28.3x —median 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.5xmedian 41.4x 32.4xmedian 41.4x 51.2xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 4.6x 4.9xmedian 4.6x 27.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.21median 2.30 1.09median 2.30 2.44median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXMKSIASML
Revenue $26.13B $4.35B $37.62B
Gross profit $13.34B $2.04B $19.58B
Operating income $9.65B $681.00M –
Net income $8.45B $439.00M –
Free cash flow $6.54B $455.00M –
R&D $2.47B $310.00M –
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $6.05 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $611.00M $15.17B
Total debt $16.44B $3.94B $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 72.70M 388.90M
Enterprise value $293.11B $12.20B $596.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIASML
P/E 37.6x 33.5x 59.1x
P/FCF 48.5x 32.4x 51.2x
P/Operating cash flow 41.8x 23.2x –
P/S 12.1x 3.4x 17.0x
P/B 22.8x 4.9x 27.8x
P/Tangible book 22.8x 15.2x 28.6x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 17.3x –
EV/EBIT 32.5x 26.6x –
EV/Revenue 12.0x 4.2x 16.8x
EV/FCF 47.9x 39.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 41.4x 28.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.21 1.09 2.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 16.3% 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 4.2% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 15.4% 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 6.7% 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% 33.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% 35.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% 64.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 31.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 52.8% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 30.7% 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -1.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 20.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -13.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 22.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIASML
Gross margin 51.1% 47.0% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 38.7% 24.0% –
Operating margin 37.0% 15.7% –
Pretax margin 37.2% 11.2% –
Net margin 32.3% 10.1% 29.1%
FCF margin 25.0% 10.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% 14.6% –
Return on equity 64.1% 15.2% –
Return on assets 33.9% 5.0% –
Return on invested capital 49.6% 8.9% –
Return on capital employed 54.8% 10.6% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIASML
Debt / assets 14.2% 44.1% 8.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 3.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 8.7x –
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 66.6% 61.2%
Equity / assets 52.8% 33.4% 38.8%
Interest coverage – 3.7x –
Current ratio 2.5x 1.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 19.96 2.42 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIASML
Dividend yield 0.4% 0.4% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 0.4% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 14.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXMKSIASML
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2027 16.2xFY2026 34.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $13.48FY2026 $47.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 +71.1%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +34.9% +42.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $5.43BFY2026 $47.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +38.1%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% +8.0% +42.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXMKSIASML
Held by institutions 85.6% 100.0% 19.8%
Institutions holding 3,132 775 2,493
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +2.8% +8.0%
Institutions buying 1,696 455 1,360
Institutions selling 1,163 252 782
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.81 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXMKSIASML
LRCX 1.00 0.84 0.85
MKSI 0.84 1.00 0.74
ASML 0.85 0.74 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, MKSI and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $317.06B, Mks (MKSI) $14.75B, Asml Holding (ASML) $640.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, MKSI and ASML?

Mks (MKSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 37.6x, Mks (MKSI) 33.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 59.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Mks (MKSI) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x, Mks (MKSI) 16.2x, Asml Holding (ASML) 34.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Mks (MKSI) +16.3%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Mks (MKSI) 10.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Mks (MKSI) 8.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +63.1%, Mks (MKSI) +55.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) +58.0%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +35.1%/yr, Mks (MKSI) +7.8%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +15.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.44%, Mks (MKSI) 0.44%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.67%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 65.8%, Mks (MKSI) 61.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, MKSI and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.