LRCX vs KLIC vs NVMI Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Kulicke & Soffa Industries and Nova Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$240.85 -23.6% 1M +53.5% 1Y
Market cap
$318.29B
P/E
37.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
NVMI Nova Ltd.
$327.60 -11.0% 1M -6.7% 1Y
Market cap
$10.02B
P/E
37.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$937.50M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kulicke & Soffa Industries leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kulicke & Soffa Industries 5, Lam Research 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXKLICNVMILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $318.29B $4.17B $10.02B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.7x 36.1x 37.1x KLIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.8x 19.2x 29.0x KLIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +44.4% +16.2% KLIC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 12.2% 28.8% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +53.5% +91.9% -6.7% KLIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +33.6%/yr +6.6%/yr +25.6%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.6% 58.8% 59.5% KLIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 57/100 55/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXKLICNVMI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXKLICNVMI
Valuation 52 #46 of 94 65 #34 of 94 57 #41 of 94
Growth 85 #15 of 92 66 #32 of 92 70 #28 of 92
Profitability 94 #6 of 90 56 #40 of 90 76 #22 of 90
Financial Health 43 #57 of 99 59 #41 of 99 14 #85 of 99
Shareholder Returns 61 #29 of 73 39 #45 of 73 –
Overall 67 57 55
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • KLIC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • NVMI ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXKLICNVMISPY
1 month -23.6%-14.1%-11.0% -0.2%
3 months -10.7%-13.8%-18.6% +3.9%
6 months -4.1%-5.6%-34.3% +8.2%
Year to date +40.7%+71.9%-0.2% +12.9%
1 year +53.5%+91.9%-6.7% +12.3%
3 years +312.4%+84.8%+260.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +60.4%+22.7%+53.4% +23.3%
5 years +325.5%+37.6%+211.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +33.6%+6.6%+25.6% +10.9%
10 years +2,390.7%+490.4%+2,596.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +37.9%+19.4%+39.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLRCXKLICNVMISPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.6%58.8%59.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.0%63.8%67.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.252.252.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.821.56-0.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-59.5%-52.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.4%-41.5%-45.9% -1.2%
52-week high $433.33$133.81$605.65 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$35.29$275.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXKLICNVMI
P/E now vs peer median 35.7xmedian 45.6x 35.4xmedian 45.6x 36.5xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 7.7x 4.3xmedian 7.7x 11.1xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 29.0x 25.3xmedian 29.0x 33.7xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 46.0xmedian 40.6x 99.7xmedian 40.6x 42.5xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 4.6x 4.5xmedian 4.6x 7.1xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.14median 2.28 4.38median 2.28 1.48median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXKLICNVMI
Revenue $26.13B $950.21M $937.50M
Gross profit $13.34B $457.82M $535.50M
Operating income $9.65B $125.54M $271.61M
Net income $8.45B $115.74M $270.51M
Free cash flow $6.54B $41.13M $244.83M
R&D $2.47B $161.53M $151.05M
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $2.17 $8.24
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $368.57M $124.85M
Total debt $16.44B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 53.43M 32.80M
Enterprise value $294.34B $2.18B $7.19B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXKLICNVMI
P/E 35.7x 35.4x 36.5x
P/FCF 46.0x 99.7x 42.5x
P/Operating cash flow 39.7x 74.4x 46.0x
P/S 11.5x 4.3x 11.1x
P/B 21.6x 4.5x 7.1x
P/Tangible book 21.6x 4.5x 7.3x
EV/EBITDA 29.4x 25.3x 33.7x
EV/EBIT 30.8x 28.5x 36.0x
EV/Revenue 11.4x 3.8x 10.4x
EV/FCF 45.5x 87.1x 40.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 39.2x 65.0x 43.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.14 4.38 1.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXKLICNVMI
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 44.4% 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 4.8% 19.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 61.0% 16.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 5.0% 20.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% 8,922% 16.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% 12.8% 24.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% 1,845% 15.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 5.5% 25.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 1,818% 12.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 8.1% 24.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -59.7% -1.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% -36.2% 20.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -65.7% -3.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% -37.0% 18.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXKLICNVMI
Gross margin 51.1% 48.2% 57.1%
EBITDA margin 38.7% 14.9% 31.0%
Operating margin 37.0% 13.2% 29.0%
Pretax margin 37.2% 15.2% 34.1%
Net margin 32.3% 12.2% 28.8%
FCF margin 25.0% 4.3% 26.1%
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% 5.8% 24.1%
Return on equity 64.1% 13.1% 19.0%
Return on assets 33.9% 9.2% 11.0%
Return on invested capital 49.6% – –
Return on capital employed 54.8% 13.5% 17.9%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.5x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 2.9% 2.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXKLICNVMI
Debt / assets 14.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 30.9% 41.1%
Equity / assets 52.8% 69.1% 58.9%
Interest coverage – 836.9x –
Current ratio 2.5x 3.4x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.8x 2.6x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.0x 1.6x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 19.18 9.14 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXKLICNVMI
Dividend yield 0.5% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.2% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.7% 1.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 37.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 104.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -1.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXKLICNVMI
Forward P/E 23.8xFY2027 19.2xFY2026 29.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $4.07FY2026 $11.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 +1,838.1%FY2026 +31.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +38.6% +17.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $1.19BFY2026 $1.15BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +82.6%FY2026 +30.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% +24.1% +23.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXKLICNVMI
Held by institutions 85.6% 92.8% 69.0%
Institutions holding 3,131 464 343
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +1.6% -4.1%
Institutions buying 1,695 267 175
Institutions selling 1,163 150 129
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.78 1.36

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXKLICNVMI
LRCX 1.00 0.69 0.84
KLIC 0.69 1.00 0.68
NVMI 0.84 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, KLIC and NVMI?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $318.29B, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) $4.17B, Nova (NVMI) $10.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, KLIC and NVMI?

Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 37.7x, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) 36.1x, Nova (NVMI) 37.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 23.8x, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) 19.2x, Nova (NVMI) 29.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) +44.4%, Nova (NVMI) +16.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) 12.2%, Nova (NVMI) 28.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +53.5%, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) +91.9%, Nova (NVMI) -6.7%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +33.6%/yr, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) +6.6%/yr, Nova (NVMI) +25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.00%, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) 0.01%, Nova (NVMI) 0.00%. Lam Research (LRCX) and Nova (NVMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 65.6%, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) 58.8%, Nova (NVMI) 59.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, KLIC and NVMI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kulicke & Soffa Industries (KLIC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.