LRCX vs AMAT vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Applied Materials and Kla Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$253.82 -19.3% 1M +63.1% 1Y
Market cap
$317.62B
P/E
37.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$416.00 -14.5% 1M +82.7% 1Y
Market cap
$335.00B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$158.77 -16.1% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$220.00B
P/E
43.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.06B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Applied Materials 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXAMATKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $317.62B $335.00B $220.00B AMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.6x 36.1x 43.9x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 30.8x 28.0x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +7.8% +12.2% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 30.1% — LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% 25.3% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -0.3x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +63.1% +82.7% +31.6% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.1%/yr +25.0%/yr +33.6%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.8% 60.6% 61.5% AMAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 57/100 43/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXAMATKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXAMATKLAC
Valuation 50 #48 of 94 52 #46 of 94 36 #61 of 94
Growth 85 #15 of 92 44 #52 of 92 54 #43 of 92
Profitability 96 #5 of 90 89 #11 of 90 92 #8 of 90
Financial Health 44 #56 of 99 48 #52 of 99 5 #94 of 99
Shareholder Returns 61 #29 of 73 51 #36 of 73 29 #52 of 73
Overall 67 57 43
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • AMAT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXAMATKLACSPY
1 month -19.3%-14.5%-16.1% +0.9%
3 months +0.6%-4.7%-6.7% +5.9%
6 months +2.0%+8.7%-12.6% +8.5%
Year to date +48.3%+61.9%+30.7% +13.3%
1 year +63.1%+82.7%+31.6% +12.4%
3 years +334.6%+216.8%+246.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +63.2%+46.9%+51.4% +23.5%
5 years +350.4%+204.4%+325.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year +35.1%+25.0%+33.6% +11.0%
10 years +2,538.5%+1,351.5%+2,026.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +38.7%+30.7%+35.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLRCXAMATKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.8%60.6%61.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%62.4%65.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.262.782.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.961.360.51 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-55.4%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.4%-42.5%-47.4% -0.9%
52-week high $433.33$723.00$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$220.23$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXAMATKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 37.6xmedian 46.0x 35.6xmedian 46.0x 41.5xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 7.9x 10.7xmedian 7.9x 14.8xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 28.3x 33.9xmedian 28.3x —median 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.5xmedian 41.4x 58.7xmedian 41.4x 68.2xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 4.6x 12.9xmedian 4.6x 31.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.21median 2.30 2.40median 2.30 2.20median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXAMATKLAC
Revenue $26.13B $30.84B $14.06B
Gross profit $13.34B $15.23B –
Operating income $9.65B $9.14B –
Net income $8.45B $9.27B $5.02B
Free cash flow $6.54B $5.62B –
R&D $2.47B $3.97B $1.53B
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $11.58 $3.80
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $7.04B $1.53B
Total debt $16.44B $26.11B –
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 800.00M 1.32B
Enterprise value $293.68B $300.44B $220.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXAMATKLAC
P/E 37.6x 35.6x 41.5x
P/FCF 48.5x 58.7x 68.2x
P/Operating cash flow 41.8x 39.3x 43.5x
P/S 12.1x 10.7x 14.8x
P/B 22.8x 12.9x 31.8x
P/Tangible book 22.8x 13.0x 32.9x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 33.9x –
EV/EBIT 32.5x 35.8x –
EV/Revenue 12.0x 10.6x 14.8x
EV/FCF 47.9x 58.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 41.4x 39.0x 43.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.21 2.40 2.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXAMATKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 7.8% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 5.1% 11.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 9.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 7.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% 6.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% 6.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% 35.6% 18.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 12.9% 17.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 36.0% 18.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 14.9% 18.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% 9.0% 12.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 1.6% 10.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -3.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% -7.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXAMATKLAC
Gross margin 51.1% 49.4% –
EBITDA margin 38.7% 31.4% –
Operating margin 37.0% 29.6% –
Pretax margin 37.2% 34.8% –
Net margin 32.3% 30.1% –
FCF margin 25.0% 18.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% 27.2% 33.9%
Return on equity 64.1% 37.4% 77.9%
Return on assets 33.9% 22.1% 27.6%
Return on invested capital 49.6% 25.3% –
Return on capital employed 54.8% 29.0% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.9x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 2.3% 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXAMATKLAC
Debt / assets 14.2% 15.0% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -0.3x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 41.1% 64.6%
Equity / assets 52.8% 58.9% 35.4%
Interest coverage – 33.0x –
Current ratio 2.5x 2.4x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 1.6x –
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.9x –
Altman Z-score 19.96 14.85 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXAMATKLAC
Dividend yield 0.4% 0.5% 0.3%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 1.1% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXAMATKLAC
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2027 30.8xFY2026 28.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $13.50FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 +43.3%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +32.7% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $32.74BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +15.4%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% +38.2% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXAMATKLAC
Held by institutions 85.6% 83.6% 91.0%
Institutions holding 3,132 3,506 2,478
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +6.0% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,696 1,790 1,285
Institutions selling 1,163 1,349 982
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.33 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXAMATKLAC
LRCX 1.00 0.91 0.88
AMAT 0.91 1.00 0.88
KLAC 0.88 0.88 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, AMAT and KLAC?

Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $317.62B, Applied Materials (AMAT) $335.00B, Kla (KLAC) $220.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, AMAT and KLAC?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 37.6x, Applied Materials (AMAT) 36.1x, Kla (KLAC) 43.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x, Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.8x, Kla (KLAC) 28.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Kla (KLAC) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +63.1%, Applied Materials (AMAT) +82.7%, Kla (KLAC) +31.6%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +35.1%/yr, Applied Materials (AMAT) +25.0%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +33.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Applied Materials (AMAT) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 65.8%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%, Kla (KLAC) 61.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, AMAT and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.