LPLA vs FUTU vs TIGR Stock Comparison

LPL Financial Holdings, Futu Holdings and UP Fintech Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FUTU Futu Holdings Ltd
$101.83 -9.3% 1M -45.8% 1Y
Market cap
$13.98B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.32B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
4 wins
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
$4.11 -11.6% 1M -61.2% 1Y
Market cap
$712.40M
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$687.88M
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Futu Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Futu Holdings 4, LPL Financial Holdings 3, UP Fintech Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPLAFUTUTIGRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.21B $13.98B $712.40M LPLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.9x 9.9x 5.9x TIGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.9x 9.9x 7.8x TIGR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.0% +44.6% +41.4% FUTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 42.7% 17.4% FUTU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 28.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.5% -45.8% -61.2% LPLA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.4%/yr +13.7%/yr -8.7%/yr FUTU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.5% 62.3% 58.1% LPLA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 81/100 72/100 FUTU

Percentile Scorecard

LPLAFUTUTIGR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPLAFUTUTIGR
Valuation 38 #60 of 96 80 #20 of 96 99 #2 of 96
Growth 67 #22 of 65 86 #10 of 65 80 #14 of 65
Profitability – 98 #2 of 65 67 #22 of 65
Financial Health – 55 #42 of 92 43 #53 of 92
Shareholder Returns 19 #31 of 38 87 #6 of 38 –
Overall 41 81 72
  • LPLA ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • FUTU ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • TIGR ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPLAFUTUTIGRSPY
1 month -13.9%-9.3%-11.6% +0.9%
3 months -20.3%0.0%-14.2% +5.9%
6 months -18.6%-33.5%-37.0% +8.5%
Year to date -24.6%-38.0%-57.0% +13.3%
1 year -21.5%-45.8%-61.2% +12.4%
3 years +21.6%+77.5%-10.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +6.7%+21.1%-3.7% +23.5%
5 years +64.1%+90.3%-36.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +10.4%+13.7%-8.7% +11.0%
10 years +760.6%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +24.0%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLPLAFUTUTIGRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.5%62.3%58.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.9%68.5%64.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.891.971.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.53-0.73-1.05 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-60.2%-68.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.5%-48.8%-63.0% -0.9%
52-week high $393.25$199.04$11.12 $779.14
52-week low $265.86$89.76$4.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPLAFUTUTIGR
P/E now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 30.1x 10.0xmedian 30.1x 6.1xmedian 30.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 3.0x 4.3xmedian 3.0x 1.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.1x —median 14.1x 1.1xmedian 14.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -26.0xmedian 15.8x —median 15.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.24median 0.54 0.24median 0.54 0.10median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPLAFUTUTIGR
Revenue $20.40B $3.32B $687.88M
Gross profit – $2.90B –
Operating income – $2.05B $163.65M
Net income – $1.42B $112.10M
R&D – $263.86M –
EPS (diluted) $17.40 $10.02 $0.64
Cash & equivalents $1.06B $2.34B $542.51M
Total debt – $2.01B –
Shares (diluted) 80.03M 141.36M 187.18M
Enterprise value $22.21B $3.67B -$1.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUTIGR
P/E 15.4x 10.0x 6.1x
P/FCF -26.0x – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 1.0x 4.3x 1.1x
P/B 3.6x 2.9x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 9.1x 2.9x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – – 1.1x
EV/EBIT – 6.4x 1.0x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 3.9x 0.3x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.24 0.24 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUTIGR
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.0% 44.6% 41.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.9% 41.3% 39.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 50.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 41.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 60.5% 136.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 50.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 39.8% -5.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.3% 63.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 67.9% 38.5% -18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 41.1% 62.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUTIGR
Gross margin – 87.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 24.9%
Operating margin – 62.0% 23.8%
Pretax margin – 52.3% 22.9%
Net margin – 42.7% 17.4%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 27.7% 13.0%
Return on assets – 4.1% 1.2%
Return on invested capital – 28.9% –
Return on capital employed – 96.0% 36.2%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUTIGR
Debt / assets – 5.4% –
Debt / equity – 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 70.7% 86.7% 90.9%
Equity / assets 29.3% 13.3% 9.1%
Interest coverage – 8.7x 2.3x
Current ratio – 1.1x 1.1x
Quick ratio – 0.1x 0.1x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 0.80 0.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUTIGR
Dividend yield 0.4% 2.6% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 2.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPLAFUTUTIGR
Forward P/E 11.9xFY2026 9.9xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $22.53FY2026 $10.31FY2026 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 -47.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.1% +29.1% +35.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.12BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026 $591.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026 -3.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.3% +19.0% +7.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPLAFUTUTIGR
Held by institutions 100.0% 31.9% 33.7%
Institutions holding 765 319 117
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +7.2% +6.6%
Institutions buying 351 157 65
Institutions selling 301 124 36
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.27 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPLAFUTUTIGR
LPLA 1.00 0.21 0.19
FUTU 0.21 1.00 0.82
TIGR 0.19 0.82 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPLA, FUTU and TIGR?

LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) $22.21B, Futu Holdings (FUTU) $13.98B, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) $712.40M.

Which stock is cheaper, LPLA, FUTU and TIGR?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 15.9x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.9x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 5.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) is cheapest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 11.9x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.9x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 7.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +31.0%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) +44.6%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) +41.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) has the highest net margin (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 42.7%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) returned the most: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) -21.5%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) -45.8%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -61.2%. Over five years, Futu Holdings (FUTU) compounded fastest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +10.4%/yr, Futu Holdings (FUTU) +13.7%/yr, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) has been the steadiest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 40.5%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 62.3%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 58.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPLA, FUTU and TIGR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.