LPLA vs FUTU vs CM Stock Comparison

LPL Financial Holdings, Futu Holdings and Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FUTU Futu Holdings Ltd
$102.36 -8.5% 1M -43.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.00B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.32B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Futu Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Futu Holdings 6, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPLAFUTUCMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.83B $14.00B $109.57B CM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.7x 9.9x 15.7x FUTU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.1x 9.9x 16.6x FUTU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.0% +44.6% +15.7% FUTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 42.7% 29.9% FUTU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 28.9% 26.3% FUTU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.5% -43.8% +40.4% CM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.7%/yr +11.9%/yr +13.8%/yr CM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 62.4% 21.7% CM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 80/100 52/100 FUTU

Percentile Scorecard

LPLAFUTUCM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPLAFUTUCM
Valuation 38 #60 of 96 79 #21 of 96 26 #268 of 360
Growth 66 #23 of 66 86 #10 of 66 75 #48 of 191
Profitability – 98 #2 of 64 89 #20 of 168
Financial Health – 52 #45 of 93 13 #153 of 175
Shareholder Returns 16 #32 of 38 87 #6 of 38 58 #143 of 341
Overall 40 80 52
  • LPLA ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • FUTU ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • CM ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPLAFUTUCMSPY
1 month +1.0%-8.5%+2.5% -0.2%
3 months -7.3%+0.5%-2.8% +3.9%
6 months -4.8%-34.0%+6.3% +8.2%
Year to date -11.1%-37.7%+28.5% +12.9%
1 year -7.5%-43.8%+40.4% +12.3%
3 years +43.4%+78.5%+235.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +12.8%+21.3%+49.7% +23.3%
5 years +81.7%+75.1%+90.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +12.7%+11.9%+13.8% +10.9%
10 years +902.1%—+209.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +25.9%—+12.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLPLAFUTUCMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%62.4%21.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.1%68.7%23.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.921.970.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.20-0.701.86 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-60.2%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-48.6%-5.9% -1.2%
52-week high $393.25$199.04$123.74 $779.14
52-week low $265.86$89.76$82.39 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPLAFUTUCM
P/E now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 28.3x 10.1xmedian 28.3x 15.6xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.9x 4.3xmedian 2.9x 4.6xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.5x —median 13.5x 4.3xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -26.0xmedian 16.0x —median 16.0x 10.5xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.82median 0.54 0.25median 0.54 0.59median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPLAFUTUCM
Revenue $20.40B $3.32B $23.35B
Gross profit – $2.90B –
Operating income – $2.05B –
Net income – $1.42B $7.33B
Free cash flow – – $10.29B
R&D – $263.86M –
EPS (diluted) $17.40 $10.02 $7.41
Cash & equivalents $1.06B $2.34B $10.94B
Total debt – $2.01B $45.66B
Shares (diluted) 80.03M 141.36M 940.68M
Enterprise value $21.83B $3.70B $68.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUCM
P/E 18.2x 10.1x 15.6x
P/FCF -26.0x – 10.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – 10.5x
P/S 1.2x 4.3x 4.6x
P/B 4.3x 2.9x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 10.7x 2.9x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 4.3x
EV/EBIT – 6.4x 4.6x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 4.0x 6.1x
EV/FCF – – 13.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 13.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.82 0.25 0.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUCM
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.0% 44.6% 15.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.9% 41.3% 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 50.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 41.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 60.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 50.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 39.8% 25.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.3% 27.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 67.9% 38.5% 24.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 41.1% 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -16.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 15.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -16.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 15.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUCM
Gross margin – 87.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 142.0%
Operating margin – 62.0% –
Pretax margin – 52.3% 39.0%
Net margin – 42.7% 29.9%
FCF margin – – 44.1%
Operating cash flow margin – – 44.1%
Return on equity – 27.7% 15.3%
Return on assets – 4.1% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 28.9% 26.3%
Return on capital employed – 96.0% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUCM
Debt / assets – 5.4% 5.4%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.0x
Debt / FCF – – 4.4x
Liabilities / assets 70.7% 86.7% 94.3%
Equity / assets 29.3% 13.3% 5.7%
Interest coverage – 8.7x 1.4x
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 0.80 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPLAFUTUCM
Dividend yield 0.4% 2.5% 3.7%
Net buyback yield – – -0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 2.5% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 42.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 30.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 12.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 19.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPLAFUTUCM
Forward P/E 14.1xFY2026 9.9xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $22.53FY2026 $10.31FY2026 $7.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.1% +29.1% +12.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.12BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026 $25.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.3% +19.0% -5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPLAFUTUCM
Held by institutions 100.0% 31.9% 45.6%
Institutions holding 765 319 566
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +7.2% 0.0%
Institutions buying 351 157 291
Institutions selling 301 124 172
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.27 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPLAFUTUCM
LPLA 1.00 0.23 0.32
FUTU 0.23 1.00 0.29
CM 0.32 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPLA, FUTU and CM?

Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) is the largest by market capitalisation: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) $21.83B, Futu Holdings (FUTU) $14.00B, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) $109.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, LPLA, FUTU and CM?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 15.7x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.9x, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 15.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Futu Holdings (FUTU) is cheapest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 14.1x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.9x, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +31.0%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) +44.6%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +15.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) has the highest net margin (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 42.7%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 29.9%). On return on invested capital, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 28.9%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 26.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) returned the most: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) -7.5%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) -43.8%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +40.4%. Over five years, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) compounded fastest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +12.7%/yr, Futu Holdings (FUTU) +11.9%/yr, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +13.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 0.00%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 0.00%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 0.03%. LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) and Futu Holdings (FUTU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) has been the steadiest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 37.0%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 62.4%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 21.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPLA, FUTU and CM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.