LPL vs ZBRA vs OUST Stock Comparison

LG Display, Zebra Technologies and Ouster Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LPL LG Display Co., Ltd.
$2.68 -10.1% 1M -45.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.76B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.53B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$384.15 +3.8% 1M +24.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.14B
P/E
33.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
7 wins
OUST Ouster, Inc.
$29.71 -32.0% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$204.91M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Zebra Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Zebra Technologies 7, Ouster 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPLZBRAOUSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.76B $18.14B $2.16B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.9x 33.7x -40.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.9% +12.7% +62.8% OUST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.7% 9.2% -26.0% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.3% 10.6% — ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.9% +24.4% -17.0% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.3%/yr -5.8%/yr -14.4%/yr ZBRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.7% 47.3% 102.2% ZBRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 61/100 44/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

LPLZBRAOUST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPLZBRAOUST
Valuation 94 #8 of 111 63 #42 of 111 11 #99 of 111
Growth 73 #30 of 108 48 #57 of 108 82 #20 of 108
Profitability 36 #67 of 104 85 #17 of 104 14 #90 of 104
Financial Health 8 #106 of 115 18 #95 of 115 88 #15 of 115
Shareholder Returns – 93 #7 of 81 24 #62 of 81
Overall 53 61 44
  • LPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • OUST ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPLZBRAOUSTSPY
1 month -10.1%+3.8%-32.0% -0.8%
3 months -14.4%+45.2%-15.5% +3.5%
6 months -35.9%+73.8%+10.4% +7.0%
Year to date -36.3%+58.2%+37.3% +12.2%
1 year -45.9%+24.4%-17.0% +13.0%
3 years -39.4%+85.4%+683.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -15.4%+22.9%+98.7% +23.1%
5 years -65.7%-25.8%-54.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.3%-5.8%-14.4% +11.0%
10 years -79.4%+472.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -14.6%+19.1%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLPLZBRAOUSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.7%47.3%102.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.1%42.0%100.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.331.694.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.740.52-0.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.0%-67.8%-95.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.5%-1.8%-52.5% -1.8%
52-week high $5.76$391.00$62.52 $779.14
52-week low $2.59$199.30$16.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPLZBRAOUST
P/E now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 32.0x 34.0xmedian 32.0x -36.8xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.8x 3.1xmedian 2.8x 9.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.4x 19.4xmedian 19.4x -33.8xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 29.0x 20.1xmedian 29.0x -24.7xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.9x 5.3xmedian 2.9x 5.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.12median 1.13 -9.00median 1.13 -0.65median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPLZBRAOUST
Revenue $17.53B $5.85B $204.91M
Gross profit $2.54B $2.90B $101.63M
Operating income $456.43M $858.00M -$62.60M
Net income -$915.07M $539.00M -$53.33M
Free cash flow $1.37B $904.00M -$82.47M
R&D $957.27M $622.00M $68.46M
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $11.20 $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $941.29M $157.00M $91.76M
Total debt $37.49B $2.77B –
Shares (diluted) 797.61M 48.13M 65.99M
Enterprise value -$1.72B $16.70B $1.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPLZBRAOUST
P/E -5.8x 34.0x -36.8x
P/FCF 2.0x 20.1x -24.7x
P/Operating cash flow 1.3x 18.6x -37.8x
P/S 0.2x 3.1x 9.9x
P/B 0.5x 5.3x 5.5x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 6.7x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA – 19.4x -33.8x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 24.2x -28.3x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 3.6x 8.7x
EV/FCF 7.6x 23.0x -21.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.8x 21.2x -33.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.12 -9.00 -0.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPLZBRAOUST
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.9% 12.7% 62.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 2.1% 51.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.3% 14.9% 90.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 101.7% 4.2% 166.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 865.5% 8.1% 39.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.4% -0.9% 45.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -141.3% -1.6% 42.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% -6.1% 48.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.6% 4.8% 52.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.0% -3.8% 56.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% 5.8% -329.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.4% 63.5% 27.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 585.0% 6.0% -416.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 83.6% 17.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPLZBRAOUST
Gross margin 14.5% 49.6% 49.6%
EBITDA margin – 18.3% -25.6%
Operating margin 2.6% 14.7% -30.6%
Pretax margin -5.1% 12.1% -25.5%
Net margin -2.7% 9.2% -26.0%
FCF margin 7.8% 15.5% -40.2%
Operating cash flow margin 12.2% 16.7% -26.3%
Return on equity -18.1% 15.6% -16.5%
Return on assets -5.1% 6.4% -12.5%
Return on invested capital 3.3% 10.6% –
Return on capital employed 4.4% 19.1% -18.1%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.3x 1.8x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.0% 18.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPLZBRAOUST
Debt / assets 48.9% 32.0% –
Debt / equity 1.8x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.4x –
Debt / FCF 6.4x 3.1x –
Liabilities / assets 72.2% 60.2% 21.8%
Equity / assets 27.8% 39.8% 78.2%
Interest coverage 0.6x – –
Current ratio 0.6x 0.5x 4.2x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.3x 3.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 3.1x
Altman Z-score 0.97 3.75 9.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPLZBRAOUST
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 5.0% -6.9%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 5.0% -6.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPLZBRAOUST
Forward P/E – 17.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.16FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $-0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -200.0%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -4.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.01BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $229.51MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.5% +1.2% +36.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPLZBRAOUST
Held by institutions 7.8% 100.0% 53.9%
Institutions holding 189 644 330
Change in shares held, QoQ +76.8% +4.5% +19.0%
Institutions buying 153 309 233
Institutions selling 22 242 66
Buyers to sellers 6.95 1.28 3.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPLZBRAOUST
LPL 1.00 0.20 0.42
ZBRA 0.20 1.00 0.34
OUST 0.42 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPL, ZBRA and OUST?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: LG Display (LPL) $2.76B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.14B, Ouster (OUST) $2.16B.

Which company is growing faster?

Ouster (OUST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LG Display (LPL) -6.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Ouster (OUST) +62.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (LG Display (LPL) -2.7%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Ouster (OUST) -26.0%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (LG Display (LPL) 3.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: LG Display (LPL) -45.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +24.4%, Ouster (OUST) -17.0%. Over five years, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) compounded fastest (LG Display (LPL) -19.3%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -5.8%/yr, Ouster (OUST) -14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has been the steadiest (LG Display (LPL) 61.7%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.3%, Ouster (OUST) 102.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPL, ZBRA and OUST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.