LPL vs LITE vs SPRS Stock Comparison

LG Display, Lumentum Holdings and Surge Components Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LPL LG Display Co., Ltd.
$2.68 -10.1% 1M -45.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.53B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.
$818.10 -13.1% 1M +356.3% 1Y
Market cap
$62.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.01B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
SPRS Surge Components Inc
$3.22 -19.3% 1M +15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.52M
P/E
17.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.54M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Lumentum Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lumentum Holdings 5, Surge Components 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPLLITESPRSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.72B $62.49B $18.52M LITE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.9x -9.0x 17.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 38.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.9% +83.2% +6.5% LITE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.7% -230.2% 2.9% SPRS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.3% 8.1% — LITE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.9% +356.3% +15.4% LITE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.3%/yr +59.0%/yr -2.4%/yr LITE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.7% 98.8% 49.6% SPRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 47/100 65/100 SPRS

Percentile Scorecard

LPLLITESPRS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPLLITESPRS
Valuation 94 #8 of 111 9 #101 of 111 98 #3 of 111
Growth 73 #30 of 108 80 #22 of 108 25 #81 of 108
Profitability 36 #67 of 104 40 #63 of 104 51 #52 of 104
Financial Health 8 #106 of 115 56 #51 of 115 84 #19 of 115
Shareholder Returns – 48 #43 of 81 –
Overall 53 47 65
  • LPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LITE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SPRS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPLLITESPRSSPY
1 month -10.1%-13.1%-19.3% -0.8%
3 months -14.4%+14.9%-16.1% +3.5%
6 months -35.9%-4.8%-8.0% +7.0%
Year to date -36.3%+122.0%-5.3% +12.2%
1 year -45.9%+356.3%+15.4% +13.0%
3 years -39.4%+2,168.1%+17.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -15.4%+183.3%+5.5% +23.1%
5 years -65.7%+913.8%-11.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.3%+59.0%-2.4% +11.0%
10 years -79.4%+1,912.5%+218.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year -14.6%+35.0%+12.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLPLLITESPRSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.7%98.8%49.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.1%100.3%61.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.333.15-0.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.743.610.31 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.0%-66.5%-49.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.5%-27.8%-24.4% -1.8%
52-week high $5.76$1,133.40$4.26 $779.14
52-week low $2.59$188.36$2.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPLLITESPRS
P/E now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 32.0x -8.8xmedian 32.0x 17.1xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.8x 24.0xmedian 2.8x 0.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.4x 89.7xmedian 19.4x 3.8xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 29.0x 241.5xmedian 29.0x 13.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.9x 15.6xmedian 2.9x 0.8xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.12median 1.13 0.03median 1.13 -0.86median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPLLITESPRS
Revenue $17.53B $3.01B $37.54M
Gross profit $2.54B $1.26B $10.91M
Operating income $456.43M $524.80M $1.08M
Net income -$915.07M -$6.94B $1.08M
Free cash flow $1.37B $300.10M $1.43M
R&D $957.27M $356.50M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $-92.99 $0.18
Cash & equivalents $941.29M $2.04B $4.72M
Total debt $37.49B $1.64B –
Shares (diluted) 797.61M 74.60M 5.98M
Enterprise value -$1.75B $54.30B -$39.33M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPLLITESPRS
P/E -5.8x -8.8x 17.1x
P/FCF 2.0x 241.5x 13.0x
P/Operating cash flow 1.3x 96.5x 12.9x
P/S 0.2x 24.0x 0.5x
P/B 0.5x 15.6x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 16.8x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 89.7x 3.8x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 136.0x 4.0x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 23.7x 0.1x
EV/FCF 7.6x 237.9x 3.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.8x 95.0x 3.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.12 0.03 -0.86

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPLLITESPRS
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.9% 83.2% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 19.5% -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.3% 173.1% 9.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 101.7% 30.2% -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 865.5% 391.4% 2.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.4% 87.0% -24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -141.3% -26,876% 19.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% -274.9% -18.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.6% -25,088% 16.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.0% -264.1% -19.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% 494.9% 36.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.4% 61.1% -14.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 585.0% 386.6% 52.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 80.2% -13.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPLLITESPRS
Gross margin 14.5% 41.7% 29.1%
EBITDA margin – 26.4% 3.0%
Operating margin 2.6% 17.4% 2.9%
Pretax margin -5.1% -238.0% 4.0%
Net margin -2.7% -230.2% 2.9%
FCF margin 7.8% 10.0% 3.8%
Operating cash flow margin 12.2% 24.9% 3.8%
Return on equity -18.1% -182.1% 5.0%
Return on assets -5.1% -96.8% 3.8%
Return on invested capital 3.3% 8.1% –
Return on capital employed 4.4% 11.2% 4.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.3x -0.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 5.6% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPLLITESPRS
Debt / assets 48.9% 22.4% –
Debt / equity 1.8x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.4x –
Debt / FCF 6.4x 5.5x –
Liabilities / assets 72.2% 36.5% 24.0%
Equity / assets 27.8% 63.5% 76.0%
Interest coverage 0.6x 24.1x –
Current ratio 0.6x 1.7x 4.4x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.1x 3.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.1x 2.3x
Altman Z-score 0.97 15.76 4.08

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPLLITESPRS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPLLITESPRS
Forward P/E – 38.4xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.34FY2026 $21.30FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY -312.5%FY2026 +145.7%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after – +61.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.55BFY2026 $6.52BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.5%FY2026 +116.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after -3.8% +62.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPLLITESPRS
Held by institutions 7.8% 92.8% –
Institutions holding 189 1,316 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +76.8% +6.6% –
Institutions buying 153 903 –
Institutions selling 22 318 –
Buyers to sellers 6.95 2.84 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPLLITESPRS
LPL 1.00 0.34 -0.09
LITE 0.34 1.00 -0.11
SPRS -0.09 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPL, LITE and SPRS?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) is the largest by market capitalisation: LG Display (LPL) $2.72B, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) $62.49B, Surge Components (SPRS) $18.52M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LG Display (LPL) -6.9%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +83.2%, Surge Components (SPRS) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Surge Components (SPRS) has the highest net margin (LG Display (LPL) -2.7%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -230.2%, Surge Components (SPRS) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) leads (LG Display (LPL) 3.3%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lumentum Holdings (LITE) returned the most: LG Display (LPL) -45.9%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +356.3%, Surge Components (SPRS) +15.4%. Over five years, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) compounded fastest (LG Display (LPL) -19.3%/yr, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +59.0%/yr, Surge Components (SPRS) -2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Surge Components (SPRS) has been the steadiest (LG Display (LPL) 61.7%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 98.8%, Surge Components (SPRS) 49.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPL, LITE and SPRS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.