LOPE vs TISI vs BWMN Stock Comparison

Grand Canyon Education, Team and Bowman Consulting Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TISI Team Inc
$23.93 -15.9% 1M +53.1% 1Y
Market cap
$109.70M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$893.54M
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Grand Canyon Education leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Grand Canyon Education 6, Bowman Consulting 4, Team 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLOPETISIBWMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.90B $109.70M $704.92M LOPE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.4x -2.6x 102.4x LOPE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.1x — 20.7x LOPE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +2.6% +14.2% BWMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.6% -4.8% 1.3% LOPE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 2.5% 3.8% BWMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 6.6x 4.4x BWMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -24.5% +53.1% -1.7% TISI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.1%/yr -0.2%/yr +22.7%/yr BWMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.9% 54.3% 63.1% LOPE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 39/100 42/100 LOPE

Percentile Scorecard

LOPETISIBWMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLOPETISIBWMN
Valuation 50 #57 of 113 55 #51 of 113 26 #84 of 113
Growth 42 #56 of 96 52 #47 of 96 82 #18 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 31 #63 of 91 37 #58 of 91
Financial Health 91 #12 of 122 18 #100 of 122 22 #96 of 122
Shareholder Returns 92 #6 of 66 – 45 #37 of 66
Overall 75 39 42
  • LOPE ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • TISI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BWMN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLOPETISIBWMNSPY
1 month +4.5%-15.9%+0.6% +0.7%
3 months +2.7%+37.2%+65.8% +3.7%
6 months -8.8%+37.1%+35.8% +7.1%
Year to date -7.3%+69.4%+29.8% +12.8%
1 year -24.5%+53.1%-1.7% +11.9%
3 years +29.8%+190.1%+60.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +9.1%+42.6%+17.1% +22.8%
5 years +93.4%-1.1%+178.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +14.1%-0.2%+22.7% +10.9%
10 years +258.0%-92.4%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.6%-22.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLOPETISIBWMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.9%54.3%63.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.7%45.1%53.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.040.031.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.770.98-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-85.5%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.4%-17.7%-3.5% -1.2%
52-week high $206.79$29.06$44.43 $779.14
52-week low $136.72$13.25$25.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLOPETISIBWMN
P/E now vs peer median 18.0xmedian 21.9x -2.6xmedian 21.9x 102.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 0.9x 0.1xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.9x 9.0xmedian 11.9x 19.3xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 14.4x 126.8xmedian 14.4x 58.8xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 2.4x -2.2xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.64median 0.97 0.07median 0.97 5.89median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLOPETISIBWMN
Revenue $1.14B $893.54M $527.60M
Gross profit – $220.90M $281.51M
Operating income $279.71M $6.77M $17.72M
Net income $224.21M -$33.37M $7.38M
Free cash flow $242.56M $863.00K $12.56M
EPS (diluted) $8.55 $-9.34 $0.41
Cash & equivalents $171.06M $25.98M $10.49M
Total debt – $326.27M $759.87M
Shares (diluted) 26.22M 4.57M 16.60M
Enterprise value $2.79B $37.92M $655.10M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLOPETISIBWMN
P/E 18.0x -2.6x 102.3x
P/FCF 16.7x 126.8x 58.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.5x 8.9x 31.8x
P/S 3.5x 0.1x 1.4x
P/B 6.0x -2.2x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 7.7x -1.3x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x 9.0x 19.3x
EV/EBIT 13.5x 60.5x 53.8x
EV/Revenue 3.3x 0.5x 1.8x
EV/FCF 15.5x 474.7x 75.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.5x 33.5x 41.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.64 0.07 5.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLOPETISIBWMN
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 2.6% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 0.8% 19.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -2.3% 15.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% 21.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.9% -40.9% 47.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 39.2% 76.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -5.2% 36.2% -32.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% -33.9% 25.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.7% 19.7% -33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.0% -35.5% 17.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -6.5% 356.5% -33.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 34.5% 49.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.1% 106.7% -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 26.4% 29.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLOPETISIBWMN
Gross margin – 24.7% 53.4%
EBITDA margin 28.1% 5.1% 9.3%
Operating margin 24.5% 0.8% 3.4%
Pretax margin 25.6% -3.6% 0.7%
Net margin 19.6% -4.8% 1.3%
FCF margin 21.2% 0.1% 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin 24.4% 1.4% 4.4%
Return on equity 32.8% – 2.9%
Return on assets 23.8% -6.8% 1.2%
Return on invested capital – 2.5% 3.8%
Return on capital employed 33.9% 1.9% 5.2%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.8x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -0.4x 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.2% 3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLOPETISIBWMN
Debt / assets – 65.4% 36.4%
Debt / equity – -6.6x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 6.6x 4.4x
Debt / FCF – 378.1x 18.0x
Liabilities / assets 27.2% 110.0% 58.6%
Equity / assets 72.8% -10.0% 41.4%
Interest coverage – 0.2x –
Current ratio 2.8x 2.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 2.7x 2.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 16.52 1.00 2.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLOPETISIBWMN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 8.5% – 3.2%
Shareholder yield 8.5% – 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLOPETISIBWMN
Forward P/E 16.1xFY2026 – 20.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.55FY2026 $-8.70FY2023 $2.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.2%FY2026 – +23.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.9% – +16.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.10BFY2026 $988.20MFY2023 $555.17MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.5%FY2026 – +27.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.7% – +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLOPETISIBWMN
Held by institutions 100.0% 57.0% 63.8%
Institutions holding 448 27 136
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% -2.7% +3.1%
Institutions buying 209 10 78
Institutions selling 182 5 36
Buyers to sellers 1.15 2.00 2.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LOPETISIBWMN
LOPE 1.00 0.08 0.03
TISI 0.08 1.00 0.02
BWMN 0.03 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LOPE, TISI and BWMN?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) $3.90B, Team (TISI) $109.70M, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) $704.92M.

Which stock is cheaper, LOPE, TISI and BWMN?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 17.4x, Team (TISI) -2.6x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 102.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) is cheapest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 16.1x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 20.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +7.0%, Team (TISI) +2.6%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has the highest net margin (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 19.6%, Team (TISI) -4.8%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) leads (Team (TISI) 2.5%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Team (TISI) returned the most: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) -24.5%, Team (TISI) +53.1%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) -1.7%. Over five years, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) compounded fastest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +14.1%/yr, Team (TISI) -0.2%/yr, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +22.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has been the steadiest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 31.9%, Team (TISI) 54.3%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 63.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LOPE, TISI and BWMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.