LOPE vs BAH vs G Stock Comparison

Grand Canyon Education, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding and Genpact Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
G Genpact LTD
$39.20 +18.5% 1M -0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.57B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Consulting Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Grand Canyon Education leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Grand Canyon Education 5, Genpact 4, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLOPEBAHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.03B $9.85B $6.57B BAH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.0x 12.6x 11.3x G
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.5x 12.4x 8.9x G
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% -6.2% +6.5% LOPE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.6% 7.1% 11.1% LOPE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.1% 15.3% BAH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 0.8x G
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.0% -3.6% -0.8% G
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.3%/yr +0.7%/yr -4.6%/yr LOPE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.2% 42.1% 40.9% LOPE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 63/100 71/100 LOPE

Percentile Scorecard

LOPEBAHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLOPEBAHG
Valuation 49 #58 of 112 74 #30 of 112 85 #18 of 112
Growth 42 #56 of 96 62 #37 of 96 54 #45 of 96
Profitability 99 #2 of 91 84 #15 of 91 79 #20 of 91
Financial Health 90 #13 of 125 29 #89 of 125 73 #34 of 125
Shareholder Returns 91 #7 of 67 65 #24 of 67 64 #25 of 67
Overall 74 63 71
  • LOPE ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BAH ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • G ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLOPEBAHGSPY
1 month +6.8%+14.4%+18.5% -0.2%
3 months +4.6%+14.0%+13.3% +3.9%
6 months -6.3%+9.4%+15.5% +8.2%
Year to date -5.4%-1.1%-16.2% +12.9%
1 year -28.0%-3.6%-0.8% +12.3%
3 years +34.0%-28.9%+19.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +10.3%-10.8%+6.1% +23.3%
5 years +78.9%+3.6%-20.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +12.3%+0.7%-4.6% +10.9%
10 years +266.9%+174.1%+69.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.9%+10.6%+5.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLOPEBAHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.2%42.1%40.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.3%42.0%37.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.030.200.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.87-0.09-0.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-67.9%-50.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.0%-18.4%-19.2% -1.2%
52-week high $218.48$102.23$48.50 $779.14
52-week low $136.72$59.71$27.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLOPEBAHG
P/E now vs peer median 18.4xmedian 21.2x 12.7xmedian 21.2x 11.4xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 11.9x 11.7xmedian 11.9x 8.3xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 13.7x 10.1xmedian 13.7x 11.5xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 2.4x 8.0xmedian 2.4x 2.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.68median 1.00 0.30median 1.00 0.71median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLOPEBAHG
Revenue $1.14B $10.98B $5.25B
Gross profit – $5.77B $1.91B
Operating income $279.71M $1.02B $778.63M
Net income $224.21M $784.00M $582.65M
Free cash flow $242.56M $984.00M $572.11M
EPS (diluted) $8.55 $6.56 $3.42
Cash & equivalents $171.06M $334.00M $517.39M
Total debt – $4.41B $1.18B
Shares (diluted) 26.22M 119.59M 170.43M
Enterprise value $2.93B $7.36B $3.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLOPEBAHG
P/E 18.4x 12.7x 11.4x
P/FCF 17.0x 10.1x 11.5x
P/Operating cash flow 14.8x 9.2x 10.2x
P/S 3.6x 0.9x 1.3x
P/B 6.2x 8.0x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 7.9x 25.5x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 12.0x 11.7x 8.3x
EV/EBIT 13.8x 13.8x 9.3x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 1.3x 1.4x
EV/FCF 15.9x 14.2x 12.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.8x 13.0x 11.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.68 0.30 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLOPEBAHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% -6.2% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 3.1% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -7.8% 9.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 7.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.9% -8.0% 5.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 25.3% 11.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -5.2% -5.1% 8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 38.5% 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.7% -2.5% 12.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 42.9% 15.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -6.5% 18.2% -0.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 61.2% 2.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.1% 20.1% 1.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 75.1% 1.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLOPEBAHG
Gross margin – 52.5% 36.5%
EBITDA margin 28.1% 10.9% 16.7%
Operating margin 24.5% 9.3% 14.8%
Pretax margin 25.6% 7.9% 14.5%
Net margin 19.6% 7.1% 11.1%
FCF margin 21.2% 9.0% 10.9%
Operating cash flow margin 24.4% 9.8% 12.3%
Return on equity 32.8% 64.1% 22.9%
Return on assets 23.8% 9.9% 10.6%
Return on invested capital – 17.1% 15.3%
Return on capital employed 33.9% 17.1% 17.6%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.7% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLOPEBAHG
Debt / assets – 53.1% 21.8%
Debt / equity – 3.5x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – 4.5x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 27.2% 85.0% 51.9%
Equity / assets 72.8% 15.0% 48.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.8x 1.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.7x 2.2x 1.8x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 16.72 3.35 3.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLOPEBAHG
Dividend yield – 2.8% 1.9%
Net buyback yield 8.3% 3.4% 4.5%
Shareholder yield 8.3% 6.2% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 20.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 21.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 7.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLOPEBAHG
Forward P/E 16.5xFY2026 12.4xFY2026 8.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.55FY2026 $6.72FY2026 $4.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.2%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.9% -3.1% +8.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.10BFY2026 $11.71BFY2026 $5.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.5%FY2026 +4.4%FY2026 +4.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.7% +3.9% +3.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLOPEBAHG
Held by institutions 100.0% 96.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 447 557 476
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +1.0% +2.2%
Institutions buying 208 283 247
Institutions selling 182 202 199
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.40 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LOPEBAHG
LOPE 1.00 0.21 0.42
BAH 0.21 1.00 0.50
G 0.42 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LOPE, BAH and G?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) $4.03B, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) $9.85B, Genpact (G) $6.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, LOPE, BAH and G?

Genpact (G) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 18.0x, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.6x, Genpact (G) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Genpact (G) is cheapest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 16.5x, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.4x, Genpact (G) 8.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +7.0%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -6.2%, Genpact (G) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has the highest net margin (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 19.6%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 7.1%, Genpact (G) 11.1%). On return on invested capital, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) leads (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 17.1%, Genpact (G) 15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genpact (G) returned the most: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) -28.0%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -3.6%, Genpact (G) -0.8%. Over five years, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) compounded fastest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +12.3%/yr, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) +0.7%/yr, Genpact (G) -4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 0.00%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 0.00%, Genpact (G) 0.02%. Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has been the steadiest (Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 32.2%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 42.1%, Genpact (G) 40.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LOPE, BAH and G?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.