LOGC vs SND vs UUUU Stock Comparison

ContextLogic Holdings, Smart Sand and Energy Fuels Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SND Smart Sand, Inc.
$4.84 -7.5% 1M +116.1% 1Y
Market cap
$194.73M
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$386.99M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
6 wins
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc
$7.55 -33.6% 1M -64.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.76M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Smart Sand leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Smart Sand 6, Energy Fuels 2, ContextLogic Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLOGCSNDUUUULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $704.35M $194.73M $2.05B UUUU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -306.2x 18.6x -25.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.3% +26.5% +62.5% UUUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.9% 2.7% -77.3% SND
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.1% -6.7% SND
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 0.1x 2.9x SND
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +99.2% +116.1% -64.7% SND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -36.6%/yr +15.5%/yr -1.5%/yr SND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.3% 70.8% 84.2% LOGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 73/100 41/100 SND

Percentile Scorecard

LOGCSNDUUUU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLOGCSNDUUUU
Valuation 44 #91 of 162 96 #7 of 162 14 #20 of 23
Growth 10 #133 of 147 75 #37 of 147 75 #6 of 21
Profitability 38 #76 of 122 55 #55 of 122 47 #10 of 18
Financial Health 29 #118 of 165 45 #92 of 165 48 #12 of 22
Shareholder Returns 28 #77 of 107 94 #7 of 107 22 #8 of 10
Overall 30 73 41
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SND ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • UUUU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLOGCSNDUUUUSPY
1 month +3.3%-7.5%-33.6% -0.8%
3 months +62.5%+2.5%-35.6% +3.5%
6 months +79.3%-10.5%-64.6% +7.0%
Year to date +101.1%+21.0%-48.1% +12.2%
1 year +99.2%+116.1%-64.7% +13.0%
3 years +315.3%+139.6%+0.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +60.8%+33.8%+0.1% +23.1%
5 years -89.8%+105.1%-7.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -36.6%+15.5%-1.5% +11.0%
10 years ——+435.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+18.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLOGCSNDUUUUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.3%70.8%84.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.9%80.9%83.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.34-0.103.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.631.64-0.77 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-70.3%-72.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-16.8%-72.8% -1.8%
52-week high $15.24$5.82$27.72 $779.14
52-week low $7.05$2.09$7.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLOGCSNDUUUU
P/E now vs peer median -303.1xmedian 12.8x 18.1xmedian 12.8x -23.0xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 3.1x 0.5xmedian 3.1x 17.8xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 7.0x 5.0xmedian 7.0x -18.0xmedian 28.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.0xmedian 15.2x 5.4xmedian 15.2x -22.9xmedian 10.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.1x 0.8xmedian 2.1x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 2.88median 0.29 0.61median 45.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLOGCSNDUUUU
Revenue $79.50M $386.99M $105.76M
Gross profit $41.90M $52.09M $43.20M
Operating income -$9.90M $7.85M -$96.29M
Net income -$300.00K $10.49M -$82.51M
Free cash flow -$43.60M $34.63M -$82.50M
R&D – – $39.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.05 $0.25 $-0.33
Cash & equivalents $11.00M $10.20M $58.42M
Total debt $211.50M $14.66M $2.03B
Shares (diluted) 45.74M 41.37M 249.32M
Enterprise value $311.55M $137.45M -$895.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLOGCSNDUUUU
P/E -303.1x 18.1x -23.0x
P/FCF -16.0x 5.4x -22.9x
P/Operating cash flow -17.6x 4.0x -30.2x
P/S 8.8x 0.5x 17.8x
P/B 0.9x 0.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 0.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 27.0x 5.0x -18.0x
EV/EBIT -90.7x 24.6x -16.9x
EV/Revenue 11.3x 0.5x 15.4x
EV/FCF -20.6x 5.6x -19.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -22.6x 4.1x -26.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.88 0.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLOGCSNDUUUU
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.3% 26.5% 62.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 8.6% 52.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 63.7% 64.5% 1,943%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% 41.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -186.8% 193.0% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 4.3% -35.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -106.5% 1,206% 11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% -44.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -129.1% 1,143% 22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% -38.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -590.1% 350.4% 29.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.8% -24.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,218% 16,392% 17.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.7% -10.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLOGCSNDUUUU
Gross margin 52.7% 13.5% 40.9%
EBITDA margin 41.8% 10.0% -85.5%
Operating margin -12.5% 2.0% -91.0%
Pretax margin -19.6% 1.9% -77.8%
Net margin -2.9% 2.7% -77.3%
FCF margin -54.8% 8.9% -78.0%
Operating cash flow margin -49.9% 12.1% -59.1%
Return on equity -2.1% 4.4% -10.8%
Return on assets -1.6% 3.1% -5.5%
Return on invested capital – 3.1% -6.7%
Return on capital employed -1.0% 2.7% -6.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 132.3x 4.5x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 14.5% 0.9% 13.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLOGCSNDUUUU
Debt / assets 21.8% 4.2% 44.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.1x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 0.1x 2.9x
Debt / FCF -4.9x 0.4x -8.2x
Liabilities / assets 24.0% 31.4% 48.0%
Equity / assets 76.0% 68.6% 52.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.9x 1.7x 27.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 25.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 25.3x
Altman Z-score -2.97 2.64 1.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLOGCSNDUUUU
Dividend yield – 5.2% –
Net buyback yield -3.7% 0.8% -14.7%
Shareholder yield -3.7% 6.0% -14.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLOGCSNDUUUU
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.17FY2026 $-0.27FY2026 $-0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -1,000.0%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2025 $380.19MFY2026 $140.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -100.0%FY2025 +15.2%FY2026 +113.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +90.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLOGCSNDUUUU
Held by institutions – 49.7% 72.3%
Institutions holding – 91 349
Change in shares held, QoQ – +12.9% +8.7%
Institutions buying – 69 203
Institutions selling – 17 93
Buyers to sellers – 4.06 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LOGCSNDUUUU
LOGC 1.00 0.01 0.07
SND 0.01 1.00 0.06
UUUU 0.07 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LOGC, SND and UUUU?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) is the largest by market capitalisation: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $704.35M, Smart Sand (SND) $194.73M, Energy Fuels (UUUU) $2.05B.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +20.3%, Smart Sand (SND) +26.5%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) +62.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Smart Sand (SND) has the highest net margin (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -2.9%, Smart Sand (SND) 2.7%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -77.3%). On return on invested capital, Smart Sand (SND) leads (Smart Sand (SND) 3.1%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -6.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smart Sand (SND) returned the most: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +99.2%, Smart Sand (SND) +116.1%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -64.7%. Over five years, Smart Sand (SND) compounded fastest (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -36.6%/yr, Smart Sand (SND) +15.5%/yr, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -1.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) has been the steadiest (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.3%, Smart Sand (SND) 70.8%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) 84.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LOGC, SND and UUUU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Smart Sand (SND) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.