LODE vs GFL vs WCN Stock Comparison

Comstock, GFL Environmental and Waste Connections Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LODE Comstock Inc.
$1.71 -29.9% 1M -43.8% 1Y
Market cap
$121.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01M
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$179.76 +15.1% 1M +3.2% 1Y
Market cap
$45.90B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Waste Connections leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Waste Connections 6, GFL Environmental 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLODEGFLWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $121.68M $16.45B $45.90B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.0x -73.3x 37.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 70.3x 33.3x WCN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -69.1% — +6.3% WCN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6,012.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.8% -3.4% +3.2% WCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -40.2%/yr +1.2%/yr +5.7%/yr WCN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 29.2% 25.8% WCN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 57/100 46/100 GFL

Percentile Scorecard

LODEGFLWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLODEGFLWCN
Valuation 13 #14 of 16 87 #3 of 16 27 #12 of 16
Growth 23 #11 of 14 15 #12 of 14 69 #5 of 14
Profitability 8 #13 of 14 39 #9 of 14 69 #5 of 14
Financial Health 73 #5 of 16 87 #3 of 16 20 #13 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 29 57 46
  • LODE ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLODEGFLWCNSPY
1 month -29.9%+5.1%+15.1% +0.9%
3 months -36.7%+8.2%+4.0% +5.9%
6 months -46.2%+8.0%+9.8% +8.5%
Year to date -54.5%+1.4%+2.5% +13.3%
1 year -43.8%-3.4%+3.2% +12.4%
3 years -57.3%+54.5%+40.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year -24.7%+15.6%+12.0% +23.5%
5 years -92.3%+5.9%+32.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -40.2%+1.2%+5.7% +11.0%
10 years -97.0%—+258.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year -29.6%—+13.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLODEGFLWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%29.2%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.6%28.4%23.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.100.24-0.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.120.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.1%-42.9%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.2%-6.3%-3.7% -0.9%
52-week high $4.77$46.51$186.62 $779.14
52-week low $1.70$33.54$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLODEGFLWCN
P/E now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 31.3x -71.8xmedian 31.3x 37.2xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 128.0xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x 4.6xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 14.3x 4.9xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.3xmedian 16.9x 5.6xmedian 16.9x 31.8xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.7x 1.4xmedian 2.7x 5.7xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.09median 2.37 1.01median 2.37 —median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLODEGFLWCN
Revenue $1.01M – $9.94B
Gross profit -$1.68M – –
Operating income -$59.32M $1.72B $1.76B
Net income -$61.13M -$385.60M $1.13B
Free cash flow -$39.16M $2.88B –
R&D $11.28M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.66 $-0.59 –
Cash & equivalents $31.41M $296.50M $95.69M
Total debt – $14.20M –
Shares (diluted) 36.71M 378.69M 253.86M
Enterprise value -$11.36M $14.47B $45.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLODEGFLWCN
P/E -2.1x -71.8x 37.2x
P/FCF -3.3x 5.6x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow -4.3x 9.4x 17.9x
P/S 128.0x 2.3x 4.6x
P/B 0.9x 1.4x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 1.7x 7.7x
EV/EBITDA -1.7x 4.9x –
EV/EBIT -1.7x 9.2x –
EV/Revenue 97.0x – 4.6x
EV/FCF -2.5x 5.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow -3.2x 9.3x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.09 1.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLODEGFLWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) -69.1% – 6.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 95.1% – 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -248.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -34.3% -0.2% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -43.3% -7.1% 10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -11.6% -110.8% 82.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.9% -45.6% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 49.5% -106.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.0% -70.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -70.7% 25.2% 4.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -40.2% -1.6% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -105.4% 11.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -35.3% 0.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLODEGFLWCN
Gross margin -165.6% – –
EBITDA margin -5,651% – –
Operating margin -5,846% – –
Pretax margin -5,767% – –
Net margin -6,012% – –
FCF margin -3,860% – –
Operating cash flow margin -3,009% – 25.4%
Return on equity -40.7% -4.0% 14.3%
Return on assets -29.7% -1.5% 5.3%
Return on invested capital – 9.7% –
Return on capital employed -31.6% 7.6% –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x -4.4x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 63.9% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLODEGFLWCN
Debt / assets – 0.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x –
Debt / FCF – 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 27.3% 59.0% 63.3%
Equity / assets 72.7% 41.0% 36.7%
Interest coverage -68.6x 2.8x –
Current ratio 3.2x 0.9x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 1.7x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score -2.28 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLODEGFLWCN
Dividend yield – 0.2% 0.8%
Net buyback yield -75.2% – –
Shareholder yield -75.2% 0.2% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLODEGFLWCN
Forward P/E – 70.3xFY2026 33.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.62FY2026 $0.62FY2026 $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +12.7%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +27.4% +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.79MFY2026 $6.10BFY2026 $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +208.8%FY2026 +26.5%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +827.1% +22.3% 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLODEGFLWCN
Held by institutions 57.0% 74.8% 85.2%
Institutions holding 107 323 829
Change in shares held, QoQ +21.1% +10.3% +1.3%
Institutions buying 67 185 410
Institutions selling 22 101 303
Buyers to sellers 3.05 1.83 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LODEGFLWCN
LODE 1.00 -0.01 0.02
GFL -0.01 1.00 0.48
WCN 0.02 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LODE, GFL and WCN?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Comstock (LODE) $121.68M, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.45B, Waste Connections (WCN) $45.90B.

Which company is growing faster?

Waste Connections (WCN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Comstock (LODE) -69.1%, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Connections (WCN) returned the most: Comstock (LODE) -43.8%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -3.4%, Waste Connections (WCN) +3.2%. Over five years, Waste Connections (WCN) compounded fastest (Comstock (LODE) -40.2%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +1.2%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Connections (WCN) has been the steadiest (Comstock (LODE) 80.1%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.2%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LODE, GFL and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Connections (WCN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.