LNG vs KMI vs VG Stock Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Kinder Morgan and Venture Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.
$299.81 +11.7% 1M +36.4% 1Y
Market cap
$61.92B
P/E
21.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.49B
Div. yield
0.74%
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
3 wins
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$33.87 +10.2% 1M +29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$75.45B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.34B
Div. yield
3.50%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
VG Venture Global, Inc.
$13.81 +9.4% 1M +47.5% 1Y
Market cap
$34.37B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.95B
Div. yield
0.70%
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Venture Global leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Venture Global 6, Kinder Morgan 3, Cheniere Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLNGKMIVGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $61.92B $75.45B $34.37B KMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.5x 20.9x 10.3x VG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.7x 20.8x 7.5x VG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.5% +11.7% +100.7% VG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% 19.6% 19.7% VG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.5% 6.3% 10.4% LNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 4.1x 5.3x LNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.74% 3.50% 0.70% KMI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.4% +29.5% +47.5% VG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.5%/yr +14.3%/yr — LNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.1% 21.2% 74.5% KMI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 45/100 55/100 VG

Percentile Scorecard

LNGKMIVG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLNGKMIVG
Valuation 47 #19 of 35 35 #23 of 35 77 #9 of 35
Growth 12 #30 of 34 67 #12 of 34 97 #2 of 34
Profitability 73 #10 of 34 52 #17 of 34 61 #14 of 34
Financial Health 65 #13 of 35 47 #19 of 35 38 #22 of 35
Shareholder Returns 63 #12 of 31 23 #24 of 31 3 #30 of 31
Overall 52 45 55
  • LNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • KMI ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • VG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLNGKMIVGSPY
1 month +11.7%+10.2%+9.4% -0.2%
3 months +18.9%+7.1%+13.6% +3.9%
6 months +13.1%+6.5%+13.6% +8.2%
Year to date +54.2%+23.2%+102.5% +12.9%
1 year +36.4%+29.5%+47.5% +12.3%
3 years +79.7%+106.9%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.6%+27.4%— +23.3%
5 years +186.7%+95.2%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +23.5%+14.3%— +10.9%
10 years +659.6%+61.5%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +22.5%+4.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLNGKMIVGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.1%21.2%74.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.4%20.5%71.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.62-0.22-1.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.251.390.64 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-20.4%-75.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.3%-1.7%-21.2% -1.2%
52-week high $300.66$34.44$17.53 $779.14
52-week low $188.83$25.84$5.92 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLNGKMIVG
P/E now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 20.9x 20.9xmedian 20.9x 10.3xmedian 20.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 2.7x 4.1xmedian 2.7x 2.0xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 11.0x 13.8xmedian 11.0x 9.9xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.2xmedian 16.5x 24.5xmedian 16.5x -4.9xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.6x 2.3xmedian 2.6x 2.8xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.83median 1.95 1.55median 1.95 —median 1.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLNGKMIVG
Revenue $21.49B $18.34B $16.95B
Gross profit $10.27B $12.18B $9.07B
Operating income $6.42B $5.31B $6.38B
Net income $4.37B $3.71B $3.78B
Free cash flow $2.79B $3.08B -$6.99B
R&D – – $174.00M
EPS (diluted) $13.92 $1.62 $1.26
Cash & equivalents $1.10B $918.00M $3.12B
Total debt $24.04B $33.07B $41.81B
Shares (diluted) 209.50M 2.23B 2.64B
Enterprise value $62.05B $75.54B $28.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLNGKMIVG
P/E 21.5x 20.9x 10.3x
P/FCF 22.2x 24.5x -4.9x
P/Operating cash flow 10.1x 11.2x 5.0x
P/S 2.9x 4.1x 2.0x
P/B 5.4x 2.3x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 2.4x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 10.7x 13.8x 9.9x
EV/EBIT 13.2x 20.2x 11.5x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 5.9x 4.3x
EV/FCF 30.4x 34.9x -10.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.8x 16.0x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.83 1.55 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLNGKMIVG
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.5% 11.7% 100.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 4.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.0% 9.8% 71.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -10.6% 5.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.6% 18.9% 119.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -22.9% 7.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -13.6% 30.8% 124.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -25.7% 13.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) -19.6% 31.9% 157.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.9% 13.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.6% 17.4% 93.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.0% 6.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.3% 11.8% 32.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.0% -3.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLNGKMIVG
Gross margin 47.8% 66.4% 53.5%
EBITDA margin 36.8% 42.6% 43.3%
Operating margin 29.9% 29.0% 37.6%
Pretax margin 25.2% 25.8% 27.1%
Net margin 13.6% 19.6% 19.7%
FCF margin 13.0% 16.8% -41.2%
Operating cash flow margin 28.6% 36.7% 40.3%
Return on equity 44.2% 11.3% 33.2%
Return on assets 9.4% 5.0% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 15.5% 6.3% 10.4%
Return on capital employed 15.0% 7.6% 11.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.8x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLNGKMIVG
Debt / assets 50.1% 43.9% 68.0%
Debt / equity 2.1x 1.0x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 4.1x 5.3x
Debt / FCF 8.6x 10.7x -6.0x
Liabilities / assets 76.0% 56.5% 80.4%
Equity / assets 24.0% 43.5% 19.6%
Interest coverage 6.3x – 3.5x
Current ratio 0.9x 0.7x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 2.23 1.33 1.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLNGKMIVG
Dividend yield 0.7% 3.5% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 5.1% – –
Shareholder yield 5.8% 3.5% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 71.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 85.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLNGKMIVG
Forward P/E 27.7xFY2026 20.8xFY2026 7.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.83FY2026 $1.63FY2026 $1.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -55.1%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026 +115.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +53.6% -11.0% -31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.37BFY2026 $17.89BFY2026 $17.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.0%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.0% +0.4% -6.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLNGKMIVG
Held by institutions 88.1% 69.3% 86.8%
Institutions holding 1,331 1,811 369
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +3.3% +1.4%
Institutions buying 685 898 263
Institutions selling 464 647 76
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.39 3.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LNGKMIVG
LNG 1.00 0.46 0.60
KMI 0.46 1.00 0.37
VG 0.60 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LNG, KMI and VG?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cheniere Energy (LNG) $61.92B, Kinder Morgan (KMI) $75.45B, Venture Global (VG) $34.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, LNG, KMI and VG?

Venture Global (VG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 21.5x, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 20.9x, Venture Global (VG) 10.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Venture Global (VG) is cheapest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 27.7x, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 20.8x, Venture Global (VG) 7.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Venture Global (VG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cheniere Energy (LNG) +17.5%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +11.7%, Venture Global (VG) +100.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Venture Global (VG) has the highest net margin (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 13.6%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 19.6%, Venture Global (VG) 19.7%). On return on invested capital, Cheniere Energy (LNG) leads (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 15.5%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 6.3%, Venture Global (VG) 10.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Venture Global (VG) returned the most: Cheniere Energy (LNG) +36.4%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +29.5%, Venture Global (VG) +47.5%. Over five years, Cheniere Energy (LNG) compounded fastest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) +23.5%/yr, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +14.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) has the highest dividend yield: Cheniere Energy (LNG) 0.74%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 3.50%, Venture Global (VG) 0.70%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kinder Morgan (KMI) has been the steadiest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 29.1%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 21.2%, Venture Global (VG) 74.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LNG, KMI and VG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Venture Global (VG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.