LMT vs MOB vs NGTF Stock Comparison

Lockheed Martin, Mobilicom and NightFood Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$635.32 +22.3% 1M +30.9% 1Y
Market cap
$143.69B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.21 -33.1% 1M
Market cap
$5.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Lockheed Martin leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Lockheed Martin 4, NightFood Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMTMOBNGTFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $143.69B $5.50B $852.59M LMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.1x — -10.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.9% — +1,462.5% NGTF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.2% — -1,039.0% LMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x — -0.4x NGTF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.9% — +3,040.0% NGTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.9%/yr — +73.5%/yr NGTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.0% 94.8% 526.8% LMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 — 26/100 LMT

Percentile Scorecard

LMTMOBNGTF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMTMOBNGTF
Valuation 68 #33 of 100 – 42 #8 of 13
Growth 62 #38 of 97 – 0 #12 of 12
Profitability 90 #11 of 96 – 46 #7 of 12
Financial Health 41 #62 of 105 85 #17 of 105 17 #11 of 13
Shareholder Returns 40 #39 of 64 – –
Overall 60 – 26
  • LMT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NGTF ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMTMOBNGTFSPY
1 month +22.3%-33.1%+10,366.7% -0.8%
3 months +9.5%-34.4%+10,366.7% +3.5%
6 months +23.8%-50.0%+10,366.7% +7.0%
Year to date +31.4%-47.4%+6,180.0% +12.2%
1 year +30.9%—+3,040.0% +13.0%
3 years +43.3%—+15,600.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.7%—+440.1% +23.1%
5 years +92.0%—+1,470.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +13.9%—+73.5% +11.0%
10 years +154.0%—+3,040.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.8%—+41.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLMTMOBNGTFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.0%94.8%526.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.5%94.0%438.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.082.531.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.03—5.77 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.2%-67.9%-95.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.1%-65.3%-3.4% -1.8%
52-week high $676.70$9.26$3.25 $779.14
52-week low $439.19$2.97$0.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMTMOBNGTF
P/E now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 26.8x —median 26.8x -10.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x 104.6xmedian 17.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 15.2x —median 15.2x -12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 25.5x —median 25.5x -99.6xmedian 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 2.5x 469.6xmedian 2.5x 72.3xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median 64.50median 0.94 —median 0.94 0.15

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMTMOBNGTF
Revenue $79.12B – $8.15M
Gross profit $9.28B – $5.34M
Operating income $9.32B – -$77.62M
Net income $6.51B – -$84.65M
Free cash flow $8.38B – -$8.56M
EPS (diluted) $28.13 – $-0.31
Cash & equivalents $5.96B $15.20M $865.89K
Total debt $20.50B – $136.49M
Shares (diluted) 231.50M 1.67B 271.53M
Enterprise value $127.92B $5.45B $849.30M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMTMOBNGTF
P/E 22.5x – -10.1x
P/FCF 17.5x – -99.6x
P/Operating cash flow 14.5x – -105.9x
P/S 1.9x – 104.6x
P/B 14.6x 469.6x 72.3x
P/Tangible book 17.6x 469.6x 146.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.7x – -12.0x
EV/EBIT 17.3x – -11.4x
EV/Revenue 2.0x – 108.1x
EV/FCF 19.2x – -102.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x – -109.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 64.50 – 0.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMTMOBNGTF
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.9% – 1,463%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% – 293.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 55.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 52.8% – -1,607%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% – -234.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 55.1% – -1,032%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.2% – -140.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 55.9% – -398.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.3% – -65.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 59.0% – -786.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% – -88.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 82.5% – -808.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.0% – -92.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMTMOBNGTF
Gross margin 11.7% – 65.5%
EBITDA margin 13.9% – -901.7%
Operating margin 11.8% – -952.6%
Pretax margin 9.7% – -1,039%
Net margin 8.2% – -1,039%
FCF margin 10.6% – -105.1%
Operating cash flow margin 12.8% – -98.8%
Return on equity 69.2% – -179.3%
Return on assets 10.3% – -87.5%
Return on invested capital 26.5% – –
Return on capital employed 23.9% – -119.7%
Asset turnover 1.2x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 24.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMTMOBNGTF
Debt / assets 31.8% – 45.3%
Debt / equity 2.0x – 2.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x – -0.4x
Debt / FCF 2.4x – -3.4x
Liabilities / assets 84.4% 38.5% 81.7%
Equity / assets 15.6% 61.5% 18.3%
Interest coverage 8.6x – -12.3x
Current ratio 1.3x 10.8x 0.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 630,161x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x 9.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.81 – 2.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMTMOBNGTF
Dividend yield 2.2% – –
Net buyback yield 0.5% – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 2.7% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 49.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 38.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMTMOBNGTF
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $29.52FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +37.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +7.7% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $85.91BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMTMOBNGTF
Held by institutions 75.5% – –
Institutions holding 2,779 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% – –
Institutions buying 1,336 – –
Institutions selling 1,026 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.30 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMTMOBNGTF
LMT 1.00 0.00 0.00
MOB 0.00 1.00 0.05
NGTF 0.00 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMT, MOB and NGTF?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lockheed Martin (LMT) $143.69B, Mobilicom (MOB) $5.50B, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) $852.59M.

Which company is growing faster?

NightFood Holdings (NGTF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +1,462.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has the highest net margin (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -1,039.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NightFood Holdings (NGTF) returned the most: Lockheed Martin (LMT) +30.9%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +3,040.0%. Over five years, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) compounded fastest (Lockheed Martin (LMT) +13.9%/yr, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +73.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%, Mobilicom (MOB) 0.00%. Mobilicom (MOB) and NightFood Holdings (NGTF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lockheed Martin (LMT) has been the steadiest (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 30.0%, Mobilicom (MOB) 94.8%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) 526.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LMT, MOB and NGTF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.