LMAT vs MDT vs ISRG Stock Comparison

Lemaitre Vascular, Medtronic and Intuitive Surgical Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
$83.79 +2.8% 1M -7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.90B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$262.43M
Div. yield
0.01%
Medical Devices Healthcare
2 wins
MDT Medtronic plc
$93.93 +6.0% 1M -0.2% 1Y
Market cap
$121.74B
P/E
23.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.54B
Div. yield
0.03%
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$445.88 +10.0% 1M -19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$155.46B
P/E
52.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Medtronic leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Medtronic 5, Intuitive Surgical 3, Lemaitre Vascular 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMATMDTISRGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.90B $121.74B $155.46B ISRG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 23.3x 52.6x MDT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 16.9x 38.9x MDT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +9.8% +20.5% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.0% 13.9% 25.5% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.00% MDT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.0% -0.2% -19.1% MDT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.3%/yr -5.0%/yr +4.6%/yr LMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.1% 24.7% 34.6% MDT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 66/100 80/100 LMAT

Percentile Scorecard

LMATMDTISRG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMATMDTISRG
Valuation 74 #59 of 227 85 #36 of 227 54 #106 of 227
Growth 89 #25 of 219 51 #107 of 219 80 #45 of 219
Profitability 96 #9 of 206 86 #29 of 206 98 #6 of 206
Financial Health 90 #25 of 238 50 #120 of 238 78 #53 of 238
Shareholder Returns 64 #49 of 134 59 #56 of 134 92 #12 of 134
Overall 83 66 80
  • LMAT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • MDT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ISRG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMATMDTISRGSPY
1 month +2.8%+6.0%+10.0% -0.2%
3 months -18.1%+8.1%+23.2% +3.9%
6 months -25.5%+14.7%-4.4% +8.2%
Year to date +3.3%-2.2%-21.3% +12.9%
1 year -7.0%-0.2%-19.1% +12.3%
3 years +76.8%+35.3%+72.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.9%+10.6%+19.9% +23.3%
5 years +49.0%-22.5%+25.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.3%-5.0%+4.6% +10.9%
10 years +296.9%+15.8%+505.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.8%+1.5%+19.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLMATMDTISRGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.1%24.7%34.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.9%22.0%37.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.430.110.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.15-0.01-0.55 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-43.6%-49.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-10.8%-24.8% -1.2%
52-week high $117.39$105.35$592.85 $779.14
52-week low $78.80$73.75$332.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMATMDTISRG
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 29.6x 23.0xmedian 29.6x 52.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 2.9x 3.2xmedian 2.9x 13.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 17.4x 14.4xmedian 17.4x 36.8xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 22.3x 19.6xmedian 22.3x 43.0xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.3x 2.4xmedian 2.3x 9.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.87median 1.04 1.59median 1.04 2.05median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMATMDTISRG
Revenue $262.43M $37.54B $11.58B
Gross profit $191.31M $24.41B $7.78B
Operating income $77.32M $6.79B $3.28B
Net income $65.67M $5.27B $2.97B
Free cash flow $73.83M $6.13B $3.60B
R&D $15.41M $2.92B $1.49B
EPS (diluted) $2.68 $4.07 $8.41
Cash & equivalents $26.63M $1.69B $2.98B
Total debt – $113.29B –
Shares (diluted) 24.53M 1.29B 351.60M
Enterprise value $458.65M $86.99B $135.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMATMDTISRG
P/E 29.2x 23.0x 52.6x
P/FCF 26.0x 19.6x 43.0x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x 15.0x 37.8x
P/S 7.3x 3.2x 13.3x
P/B 4.6x 2.4x 9.6x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 3.0x 10.4x
EV/EBITDA 17.4x 14.4x 36.8x
EV/EBIT 19.9x 20.6x 45.8x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 3.7x 13.0x
EV/FCF 20.9x 22.8x 41.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.6x 17.4x 36.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.87 1.59 2.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMATMDTISRG
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 9.8% 20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 6.0% 19.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.0% 9.3% 21.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 5.6% 19.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 41.2% 10.9% 16.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 6.4% 24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.4% 12.4% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.6% 13.0% 24.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.1% 12.4% 10.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 14.5% 25.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.2% 12.4% 38.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.0% 11.3% 26.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.1% 15.6% 58.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.4% 11.3% 42.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMATMDTISRG
Gross margin 72.9% 65.0% 67.2%
EBITDA margin 33.8% 25.9% 35.3%
Operating margin 29.5% 18.1% 28.4%
Pretax margin 32.3% 17.6% 31.3%
Net margin 25.0% 13.9% 25.5%
FCF margin 28.1% 16.3% 31.1%
Operating cash flow margin 31.6% 21.4% 35.3%
Return on equity 15.9% 10.4% 17.3%
Return on assets 10.3% 5.7% 14.8%
Return on invested capital – 6.9% –
Return on capital employed 12.8% 8.3% 18.7%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 1.3% 7.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMATMDTISRG
Debt / assets – 30.2% –
Debt / equity – 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.0x –
Debt / FCF – 4.6x –
Liabilities / assets 34.4% 45.5% 16.7%
Equity / assets 65.6% 54.5% 83.3%
Interest coverage 14.9x 9.4x –
Current ratio 16.3x 2.1x 3.3x
Quick ratio 13.8x 1.3x 2.3x
Cash ratio 12.6x 0.7x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 7.34 3.00 30.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMATMDTISRG
Dividend yield 1.1% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.3% 0.2% 2.8%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 3.2% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.2% 69.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.8% 59.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 26.3% 1.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 0.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMATMDTISRG
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 16.9xFY2026 38.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $5.57FY2026 $11.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +0.7%FY2026 +28.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +7.2% +4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $266.90MFY2026 $39.92BFY2026 $11.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.4% -4.7% +11.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMATMDTISRG
Held by institutions 99.3% 85.1% 86.2%
Institutions holding 327 2,124 2,235
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -0.2% +4.6%
Institutions buying 172 1,013 1,070
Institutions selling 98 913 877
Buyers to sellers 1.76 1.11 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMATMDTISRG
LMAT 1.00 0.25 0.23
MDT 0.25 1.00 0.43
ISRG 0.23 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMAT, MDT and ISRG?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) $1.90B, Medtronic (MDT) $121.74B, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $155.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, LMAT, MDT and ISRG?

Medtronic (MDT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 29.0x, Medtronic (MDT) 23.3x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 52.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Medtronic (MDT) is cheapest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.4x, Medtronic (MDT) 16.9x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 38.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +11.8%, Medtronic (MDT) +9.8%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 25.0%, Medtronic (MDT) 13.9%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Medtronic (MDT) returned the most: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) -7.0%, Medtronic (MDT) -0.2%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -19.1%. Over five years, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) compounded fastest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +8.3%/yr, Medtronic (MDT) -5.0%/yr, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Medtronic (MDT) has the highest dividend yield: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 0.01%, Medtronic (MDT) 0.03%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 0.00%. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Medtronic (MDT) has been the steadiest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 46.1%, Medtronic (MDT) 24.7%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LMAT, MDT and ISRG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Medtronic (MDT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.