LMAT vs BSX vs ALC Stock Comparison

Lemaitre Vascular, Boston Scientific and Alcon Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
$83.79 +2.8% 1M -7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.92B
P/E
29.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$262.43M
Div. yield
1.13%
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins
BSX Boston Scientific Corp
$45.08 +2.6% 1M -56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$65.33B
P/E
18.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.00B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins
ALC Alcon Inc
$69.42 +7.7% 1M -8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$33.84B
P/E
53.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.80B
Div. yield
0.40%
Medical Devices Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Boston Scientific leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Boston Scientific 5, Lemaitre Vascular 5, Alcon 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMATBSXALCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.92B $65.33B $33.84B BSX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.2x 18.0x 53.2x BSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 14.4x 21.6x BSX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +13.5% +8.5% BSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.0% 17.5% 6.0% LMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.5% 3.6% BSX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.13% — 0.40% LMAT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.0% -56.0% -8.8% LMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.3%/yr +0.8%/yr -3.5%/yr LMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.1% 39.9% 28.6% ALC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 69/100 68/100 LMAT

Percentile Scorecard

LMATBSXALC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMATBSXALC
Valuation 74 #59 of 227 89 #26 of 227 79 #48 of 227
Growth 89 #25 of 219 86 #32 of 219 48 #114 of 219
Profitability 96 #9 of 206 91 #19 of 206 76 #50 of 206
Financial Health 90 #25 of 238 42 #138 of 238 60 #96 of 238
Shareholder Returns 64 #49 of 134 39 #82 of 134 74 #35 of 134
Overall 83 69 68
  • LMAT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • BSX ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ALC ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMATBSXALCSPY
1 month +2.8%+2.6%+7.7% -0.2%
3 months -18.1%-2.3%+0.4% +3.9%
6 months -25.5%-22.9%-7.9% +8.2%
Year to date +3.3%-52.7%-11.9% +12.9%
1 year -7.0%-56.0%-8.8% +12.3%
3 years +76.8%-9.0%-0.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.9%-3.1%-0.3% +23.3%
5 years +49.0%+4.3%-16.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.3%+0.8%-3.5% +10.9%
10 years +296.9%+109.8%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.8%+7.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLMATBSXALCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.1%39.9%28.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.9%46.9%28.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.430.140.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.15-1.40-0.31 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-61.6%-38.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-57.1%-20.4% -1.2%
52-week high $117.39$104.98$87.18 $779.14
52-week low $78.80$41.57$62.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMATBSXALC
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 29.6x 18.0xmedian 29.6x 53.2xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 17.4x 13.9xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 22.3x 18.0xmedian 22.3x 19.4xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.3x 2.6xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.87median 1.04 0.29median 1.04 2.54median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMATBSXALC
Revenue $262.43M $21.00B $10.80B
Gross profit $191.31M $14.68B $6.17B
Operating income $77.32M $4.15B $948.00M
Net income $65.67M $3.67B $643.00M
Free cash flow $73.83M $3.63B $1.74B
R&D $15.41M $2.15B $1.43B
EPS (diluted) $2.68 $2.49 $1.30
Cash & equivalents $26.63M $539.00M $1.36B
Total debt – $12.62B $4.72B
Shares (diluted) 24.53M 1.47B 496.20M
Enterprise value $470.20M $60.34B $24.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMATBSXALC
P/E 29.2x 18.0x 53.2x
P/FCF 26.0x 18.0x 19.4x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x 14.4x 14.6x
P/S 7.3x 3.1x 3.1x
P/B 4.6x 2.6x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 3.6x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 17.4x 13.9x –
EV/EBIT 19.9x 18.6x 38.4x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 3.7x 3.4x
EV/FCF 20.9x 21.4x 20.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.6x 17.1x 15.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.87 0.29 2.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMATBSXALC
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 13.5% 8.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 16.1% 5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.0% 16.3% 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 16.4% 7.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 41.2% 31.9% -34.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 31.5% 7.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.4% 46.9% -40.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.6% 59.0% 21.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.1% 48.6% -40.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 61.5% 21.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.2% 5.7% 10.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.0% 28.7% 25.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.1% 4.0% 7.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.4% 33.9% 48.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMATBSXALC
Gross margin 72.9% 69.9% 57.2%
EBITDA margin 33.8% 26.5% –
Operating margin 29.5% 19.8% 8.8%
Pretax margin 32.3% 18.4% 6.9%
Net margin 25.0% 17.5% 6.0%
FCF margin 28.1% 17.3% 16.1%
Operating cash flow margin 31.6% 21.6% 21.4%
Return on equity 15.9% 14.3% 2.9%
Return on assets 10.3% 8.2% 2.1%
Return on invested capital – 10.5% 3.6%
Return on capital employed 12.8% 10.8% 3.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.2x 3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 1.5% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMATBSXALC
Debt / assets – 27.9% 15.2%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.2x –
Debt / FCF – 3.5x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 34.4% 44.3% 30.6%
Equity / assets 65.6% 55.7% 69.4%
Interest coverage 14.9x 11.4x 9.2x
Current ratio 16.3x 1.2x 2.1x
Quick ratio 13.8x 0.6x 1.3x
Cash ratio 12.6x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 7.34 3.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMATBSXALC
Dividend yield 1.1% – 0.4%
Net buyback yield -0.3% -0.3% 2.7%
Shareholder yield 0.8% -0.3% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 26.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 20.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMATBSXALC
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 14.4xFY2026 21.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $3.12FY2026 $3.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026 +7.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +14.7% +15.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $266.90MFY2026 $20.67BFY2026 $10.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.4% +1.6% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMATBSXALC
Held by institutions 99.3% 90.5% 48.8%
Institutions holding 327 1,481 629
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -0.7% +5.3%
Institutions buying 172 738 225
Institutions selling 98 610 274
Buyers to sellers 1.76 1.21 0.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMATBSXALC
LMAT 1.00 0.26 0.26
BSX 0.26 1.00 0.29
ALC 0.26 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMAT, BSX and ALC?

Boston Scientific (BSX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) $1.92B, Boston Scientific (BSX) $65.33B, Alcon (ALC) $33.84B.

Which stock is cheaper, LMAT, BSX and ALC?

Boston Scientific (BSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 29.2x, Boston Scientific (BSX) 18.0x, Alcon (ALC) 53.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Boston Scientific (BSX) is cheapest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.4x, Boston Scientific (BSX) 14.4x, Alcon (ALC) 21.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Boston Scientific (BSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +11.8%, Boston Scientific (BSX) +13.5%, Alcon (ALC) +8.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) has the highest net margin (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 25.0%, Boston Scientific (BSX) 17.5%, Alcon (ALC) 6.0%). On return on invested capital, Boston Scientific (BSX) leads (Boston Scientific (BSX) 10.5%, Alcon (ALC) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) returned the most: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) -7.0%, Boston Scientific (BSX) -56.0%, Alcon (ALC) -8.8%. Over five years, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) compounded fastest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +8.3%/yr, Boston Scientific (BSX) +0.8%/yr, Alcon (ALC) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) has the highest dividend yield: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 1.13%, Alcon (ALC) 0.40%. Boston Scientific (BSX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alcon (ALC) has been the steadiest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 46.1%, Boston Scientific (BSX) 39.9%, Alcon (ALC) 28.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LMAT, BSX and ALC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Boston Scientific (BSX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.