LMAT vs ABT vs BSX Stock Comparison

Lemaitre Vascular, Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
$83.79 +2.8% 1M -7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.91B
P/E
29.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$262.43M
Div. yield
0.01%
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$103.13 +1.8% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$179.53B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$48.23B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
2 wins
BSX Boston Scientific Corp
$45.08 +2.6% 1M -56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$62.07B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.00B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lemaitre Vascular leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Lemaitre Vascular 4, Boston Scientific 3, Abbott Laboratories 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMATABTBSXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.91B $179.53B $62.07B ABT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.1x 38.2x 16.9x BSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 18.1x 14.4x BSX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +10.0% +13.5% BSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.0% — 17.5% LMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 10.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.0% -18.9% -56.0% LMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.3%/yr -4.2%/yr +0.8%/yr LMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.1% 27.4% 39.9% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 60/100 69/100 LMAT

Percentile Scorecard

LMATABTBSX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMATABTBSX
Valuation 74 #59 of 227 74 #60 of 227 89 #26 of 227
Growth 89 #25 of 219 17 #181 of 219 86 #32 of 219
Profitability 96 #9 of 206 – 91 #19 of 206
Financial Health 90 #25 of 238 – 42 #138 of 238
Shareholder Returns 64 #49 of 134 90 #15 of 134 39 #82 of 134
Overall 83 60 69
  • LMAT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • BSX ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMATABTBSXSPY
1 month +2.8%+1.8%+2.6% -0.2%
3 months -18.1%-3.9%-2.3% +3.9%
6 months -25.5%+9.9%-22.9% +8.2%
Year to date +3.3%-17.7%-52.7% +12.9%
1 year -7.0%-18.9%-56.0% +12.3%
3 years +76.8%+11.1%-9.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.9%+3.6%-3.1% +23.3%
5 years +49.0%-19.2%+4.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.3%-4.2%+0.8% +10.9%
10 years +296.9%+156.0%+109.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.8%+9.9%+7.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLMATABTBSXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.1%27.4%39.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.9%27.5%46.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.43-0.010.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.15-0.69-1.40 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-41.6%-61.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-21.0%-57.1% -1.2%
52-week high $117.39$130.59$104.98 $779.14
52-week low $78.80$82.56$41.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMATABTBSX
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 29.6x 38.2xmedian 29.6x 18.0xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 2.9x 3.7xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x 13.9xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 22.3x 22.3xmedian 22.3x 18.0xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x 2.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.87median 1.04 -12.85median 1.04 0.29median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMATABTBSX
Revenue $262.43M $48.23B $21.00B
Gross profit $191.31M – $14.68B
Operating income $77.32M $6.65B $4.15B
Net income $65.67M – $3.67B
Free cash flow $73.83M – $3.63B
R&D $15.41M $3.31B $2.15B
EPS (diluted) $2.68 $2.70 $2.49
Cash & equivalents $26.63M – $539.00M
Total debt – – $12.62B
Shares (diluted) 24.53M 1.74B 1.47B
Enterprise value $462.77M $179.53B $56.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMATABTBSX
P/E 29.2x 38.2x 18.0x
P/FCF 26.0x 22.3x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x – 14.4x
P/S 7.3x 3.7x 3.1x
P/B 4.6x – 2.6x
P/Tangible book 4.9x – 3.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.4x – 13.9x
EV/EBIT 19.9x – 18.6x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 3.7x 3.7x
EV/FCF 20.9x – 21.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.6x – 17.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.87 -12.85 0.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMATABTBSX
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 10.0% 13.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 6.5% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.0% – 16.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.8% – 16.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 41.2% -13.8% 31.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 3.5% 31.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.4% – 46.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.6% – 59.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.1% -66.2% 48.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% -3.0% 61.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.2% – 5.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.0% – 28.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.1% – 4.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.4% – 33.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMATABTBSX
Gross margin 72.9% – 69.9%
EBITDA margin 33.8% – 26.5%
Operating margin 29.5% – 19.8%
Pretax margin 32.3% – 18.4%
Net margin 25.0% – 17.5%
FCF margin 28.1% – 17.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.6% – 21.6%
Return on equity 15.9% – 14.3%
Return on assets 10.3% – 8.2%
Return on invested capital – – 10.5%
Return on capital employed 12.8% – 10.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMATABTBSX
Debt / assets – – 27.9%
Debt / equity – – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.2x
Debt / FCF – – 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 34.4% – 44.3%
Equity / assets 65.6% – 55.7%
Interest coverage 14.9x – 11.4x
Current ratio 16.3x – 1.2x
Quick ratio 13.8x – 0.6x
Cash ratio 12.6x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 7.34 – 3.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMATABTBSX
Dividend yield 1.1% 2.4% –
Net buyback yield -0.3% – -0.3%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 2.4% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 26.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 20.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMATABTBSX
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 18.1xFY2026 14.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $5.69FY2026 $3.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +10.4% +14.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $266.90MFY2026 $53.00BFY2026 $20.67BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.4% -2.2% +1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMATABTBSX
Held by institutions 99.3% 79.2% 90.5%
Institutions holding 327 2,979 1,481
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +0.3% -0.7%
Institutions buying 172 1,259 738
Institutions selling 98 1,377 610
Buyers to sellers 1.76 0.91 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMATABTBSX
LMAT 1.00 0.26 0.26
ABT 0.26 1.00 0.37
BSX 0.26 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMAT, ABT and BSX?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) $1.91B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $179.53B, Boston Scientific (BSX) $62.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, LMAT, ABT and BSX?

Boston Scientific (BSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 29.1x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 38.2x, Boston Scientific (BSX) 16.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Boston Scientific (BSX) is cheapest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.4x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.1x, Boston Scientific (BSX) 14.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Boston Scientific (BSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +11.8%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +10.0%, Boston Scientific (BSX) +13.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) has the highest net margin (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 25.0%, Boston Scientific (BSX) 17.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) returned the most: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) -7.0%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -18.9%, Boston Scientific (BSX) -56.0%. Over five years, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) compounded fastest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +8.3%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -4.2%/yr, Boston Scientific (BSX) +0.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 0.01%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 0.00%, Boston Scientific (BSX) 0.00%. Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Boston Scientific (BSX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 46.1%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%, Boston Scientific (BSX) 39.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LMAT, ABT and BSX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.