LLYVA vs MANU vs RLNDF Stock Comparison

Liberty Live Holdings, Manchester United and RoyaLand Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.72 +1.7% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.57B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
RLNDF RoyaLand Co Ltd.
$3.00 -14.3% 1M +200.0% 1Y
Market cap
$41.93M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Liberty Live Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Liberty Live Holdings 4, Manchester United 3, RoyaLand 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLLYVAMANURLNDFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.83B $3.57B $41.93M LLYVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20.1x -61.7x -1,048,125,000x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.9% +5.5% — LLYVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -108.1% -6.4% — MANU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.6% 2.6% — MANU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -68.6x 2.4x — LLYVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +13.8% +200.0% RLNDF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.0%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 33.6% — LLYVA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 45/100 — MANU

Percentile Scorecard

LLYVAMANURLNDF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLLYVAMANURLNDF
Valuation 8 #12 of 13 30 #31 of 44 –
Growth 90 #2 of 11 76 #11 of 43 –
Profitability 10 #10 of 11 50 #21 of 41 –
Financial Health 17 #11 of 13 24 #36 of 47 3 #173 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 31 45 –
  • LLYVA ranked among 13 companies in Live Venues
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • RLNDF ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLLYVAMANURLNDFSPY
1 month -0.3%+1.7%-14.3% -0.8%
3 months -2.9%-9.8%+20.0% +3.5%
6 months +5.1%+20.3%+252.9% +7.0%
Year to date +17.8%+30.2%+200.0% +12.2%
1 year +6.6%+13.8%+200.0% +13.0%
3 years +219.7%+17.1%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +47.4%+5.4%— +23.1%
5 years —+27.5%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —+5.0%— +11.0%
10 years —+34.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+3.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLLYVAMANURLNDFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%33.6%— 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.4%32.1%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.68— 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.210.41— 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -24.4%-54.5%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.6%-14.3%-86.7% -1.8%
52-week high $104.99$24.19$22.50 $779.14
52-week low $74.85$15.20$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLLYVAMANURLNDF
P/E now vs peer median -20.1xmedian 50.6x -61.7xmedian 17.1x -1,048,125,000xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 1.3x 4.0xmedian 1.9x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -446.5xmedian 17.8x 13.0xmedian 10.9x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,205xmedian 17.3x 9.9xmedian 11.4x —median 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median -14.1xmedian 2.4x 18.1xmedian 2.5x -122.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.26 3.65median 0.57 —median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLLYVAMANURLNDF
Revenue $406.97M $909.31M –
Gross profit $75.92M -$21.12M –
Operating income -$49.43M $30.28M –
Net income -$440.14M -$57.81M –
Free cash flow -$7.33M $363.93M –
EPS (diluted) $-4.75 $-0.34 –
Cash & equivalents $523.35M $89.13M $31.71K
Total debt $7.48B $3.96B –
Shares (diluted) 92.60M 172.43M 13.98M
Enterprise value $6.86B $3.24B $41.33M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANURLNDF
P/E -20.1x -61.7x -1,048,125,000x
P/FCF -1,205x 9.9x –
P/Operating cash flow -1,205x 14.3x –
P/S 21.7x 4.0x –
P/B -14.1x 18.1x -122.7x
P/Tangible book -12.0x 18.1x -122.7x
EV/EBITDA -446.5x 13.0x –
EV/EBIT -211.1x 146.4x –
EV/Revenue 25.6x 4.9x –
EV/FCF -1,424x 12.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1,424x 17.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 3.65 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANURLNDF
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.9% 5.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 24.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 57.4% 223.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 62.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -20.5% -36.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -19.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -35.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -16.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 128.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 141.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANURLNDF
Gross margin 18.7% -2.3% –
EBITDA margin -5.7% 37.6% –
Operating margin -12.1% 3.3% –
Pretax margin -137.3% -7.0% –
Net margin -108.1% -6.4% –
FCF margin -1.8% 40.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -1.8% 27.8% –
Return on equity – -26.5% –
Return on assets -22.6% -2.8% –
Return on invested capital -2.6% 2.6% –
Return on capital employed – 2.5% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x -4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANURLNDF
Debt / assets 105.6% 44.5% –
Debt / equity -3.4x 4.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -68.6x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF -290.0x 2.5x –
Liabilities / assets 131.1% 90.3% 782.0%
Equity / assets -31.1% 9.7% -682.0%
Interest coverage -1.7x 0.5x –
Current ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.1x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.28 0.97 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANURLNDF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLLYVAMANURLNDF
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.18FY2027 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.07BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -6.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLLYVAMANURLNDF
Held by institutions 100.0% 17.1% –
Institutions holding 250 125 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.0% –
Institutions buying 105 63 –
Institutions selling 70 30 –
Buyers to sellers 1.50 2.10 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LLYVAMANURLNDF
LLYVA 1.00 0.28 –
MANU 0.28 1.00 –
RLNDF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LLYVA, MANU and RLNDF?

Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) $8.83B, Manchester United (MANU) $3.57B, RoyaLand (RLNDF) $41.93M.

Which company is growing faster?

Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) +14.9%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Manchester United (MANU) has the highest net margin (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) -108.1%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Manchester United (MANU) leads (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) -2.6%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RoyaLand (RLNDF) returned the most: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) +6.6%, Manchester United (MANU) +13.8%, RoyaLand (RLNDF) +200.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) has been the steadiest (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) 31.8%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LLYVA, MANU and RLNDF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.