LLYVA vs MANU vs NIPG Stock Comparison

Liberty Live Holdings, Manchester United and Nip Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.97 +0.9% 1M +21.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
NIPG NIP Group Inc.
$3.70 -66.3% 1M +122.9% 1Y
Market cap
$11.29M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Live Entertainment Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Liberty Live Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Liberty Live Holdings 4, Manchester United 3, Nip 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLLYVAMANUNIPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.22B $3.62B $11.29M LLYVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -21.0x -62.6x 0.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.9% +5.5% — LLYVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -108.1% -6.4% — MANU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.6% 2.6% — MANU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -68.6x 2.4x — LLYVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.1% +21.2% +122.9% NIPG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.2%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.7% 33.3% 369.1% LLYVA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 46/100 — MANU

Percentile Scorecard

LLYVAMANUNIPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLLYVAMANUNIPG
Valuation 8 #12 of 13 30 #32 of 45 58 #6 of 13
Growth 80 #3 of 11 76 #11 of 43 –
Profitability 10 #10 of 11 51 #21 of 42 –
Financial Health 9 #11 of 12 26 #36 of 48 36 #8 of 12
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 27 46 –
  • LLYVA ranked among 13 companies in Live Venues
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • NIPG ranked among 13 companies in Live Venues

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLLYVAMANUNIPGSPY
1 month +2.6%+0.9%-66.3% +0.7%
3 months -3.0%-10.4%-61.1% +3.7%
6 months +8.6%+11.1%+452.2% +7.1%
Year to date +21.6%+31.7%+270.0% +12.8%
1 year +13.1%+21.2%+122.9% +11.9%
3 years +221.4%+16.6%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +47.6%+5.2%— +22.8%
5 years —+28.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year —+5.2%— +10.9%
10 years —+37.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+3.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLLYVAMANUNIPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.7%33.3%369.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%31.8%140.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.670.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.410.640.33 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -24.4%-54.5%-98.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.6%-13.3%-81.4% -1.2%
52-week high $104.99$24.19$19.88 $779.14
52-week low $74.85$15.20$0.25 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLLYVAMANUNIPG
P/E now vs peer median -20.7xmedian 52.7x -62.5xmedian 17.4x 0.0xmedian 52.7x
P/S now vs peer median 22.4xmedian 1.5x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 0.1xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -458.6xmedian 18.6x 13.1xmedian 10.8x —median 18.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,244xmedian 17.7x 10.0xmedian 11.7x -1.1xmedian 17.7x
P/B now vs peer median -14.6xmedian 2.5x 18.3xmedian 2.5x 0.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.28 3.69median 0.55 —median 0.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLLYVAMANUNIPG
Revenue $406.97M $909.31M –
Gross profit $75.92M -$21.12M –
Operating income -$49.43M $30.28M –
Net income -$440.14M -$57.81M –
Free cash flow -$7.33M $363.93M –
EPS (diluted) $-4.75 $-0.34 –
Cash & equivalents $523.35M $89.13M $7.14T
Total debt $7.48B $3.96B $43.43T
Shares (diluted) 92.60M 172.43M 2.67M
Enterprise value $7.25B $3.29B -$30.36T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANUNIPG
P/E -20.7x -62.5x 0.0x
P/FCF -1,244x 10.0x -1.1x
P/Operating cash flow -1,244x 14.4x –
P/S 22.4x 4.0x 0.1x
P/B -14.6x 18.3x 0.4x
P/Tangible book -12.4x 18.3x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA -458.6x 13.1x –
EV/EBIT -216.8x 147.9x –
EV/Revenue 26.3x 4.9x –
EV/FCF -1,462x 12.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1,462x 17.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 3.69 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANUNIPG
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.9% 5.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 24.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 57.4% 223.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 62.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -20.5% -36.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -19.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -35.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -16.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 128.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 141.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANUNIPG
Gross margin 18.7% -2.3% –
EBITDA margin -5.7% 37.6% –
Operating margin -12.1% 3.3% –
Pretax margin -137.3% -7.0% –
Net margin -108.1% -6.4% –
FCF margin -1.8% 40.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -1.8% 27.8% –
Return on equity – -26.5% –
Return on assets -22.6% -2.8% –
Return on invested capital -2.6% 2.6% –
Return on capital employed – 2.5% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x -4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANUNIPG
Debt / assets 105.6% 44.5% 21.5%
Debt / equity -3.4x 4.6x 906,712x
Net debt / EBITDA -68.6x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF -290.0x 2.5x –
Liabilities / assets 131.1% 90.3% 100.0%
Equity / assets -31.1% 9.7% 0.0%
Interest coverage -1.7x 0.5x –
Current ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.34 0.98 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLLYVAMANUNIPG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLLYVAMANUNIPG
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.18FY2027 $-4.89FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.07BFY2027 $284.83MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.6%FY2027 +125.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -6.0% -43.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLLYVAMANUNIPG
Held by institutions 100.0% 17.1% –
Institutions holding 250 125 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.0% –
Institutions buying 105 63 –
Institutions selling 70 30 –
Buyers to sellers 1.50 2.10 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LLYVAMANUNIPG
LLYVA 1.00 0.28 0.04
MANU 0.28 1.00 0.03
NIPG 0.04 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LLYVA, MANU and NIPG?

Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) $9.22B, Manchester United (MANU) $3.62B, Nip (NIPG) $11.29M.

Which company is growing faster?

Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) +14.9%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Manchester United (MANU) has the highest net margin (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) -108.1%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Manchester United (MANU) leads (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) -2.6%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nip (NIPG) returned the most: Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) +13.1%, Manchester United (MANU) +21.2%, Nip (NIPG) +122.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) has been the steadiest (Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) 31.7%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.3%, Nip (NIPG) 369.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LLYVA, MANU and NIPG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Liberty Live Holdings (LLYVA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.