LITE vs TRCK vs LFUS Stock Comparison

Lumentum Holdings, Track and Littelfuse Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.
$913.95 -0.8% 1M +360.7% 1Y
Market cap
$68.85B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.01B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
6 wins
TRCK Track Group, Inc.
$0.46 0.0% 1M +24.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.88M
P/E
0.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.25M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$387.15 -9.8% 1M +47.5% 1Y
Market cap
$10.27B
P/E
271.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.76B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lumentum Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lumentum Holdings 6, Track 3, Littelfuse 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLITETRCKLFUSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $68.85B $14.88M $10.27B LITE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.9x 0.7x 271.9x TRCK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.0x — 21.8x LFUS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +83.2% +1.1% +18.7% LITE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -230.2% 59.2% 1.4% TRCK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 5.5% 1.3% LITE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x 1.5x -0.7x LITE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +360.7% +24.3% +47.5% LITE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +61.8%/yr -30.3%/yr +5.6%/yr LITE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 98.8% 196.2% 43.1% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 70/100 53/100 TRCK

Percentile Scorecard

LITETRCKLFUS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLITETRCKLFUS
Valuation 10 #100 of 111 96 #6 of 111 63 #42 of 111
Growth 80 #22 of 108 77 #26 of 108 33 #73 of 108
Profitability 40 #63 of 104 81 #21 of 104 63 #39 of 104
Financial Health 54 #53 of 115 26 #85 of 115 67 #39 of 115
Shareholder Returns 49 #40 of 78 – 40 #47 of 78
Overall 47 70 53
  • LITE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TRCK ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LFUS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLITETRCKLFUSSPY
1 month -0.8%0.0%-9.8% +0.9%
3 months +51.7%-31.3%-5.7% +5.9%
6 months +6.5%-36.1%-1.1% +8.5%
Year to date +148.0%+53.3%+53.1% +13.3%
1 year +360.7%+24.3%+47.5% +12.4%
3 years +2,433.8%+70.4%+79.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +193.9%+19.4%+21.4% +23.5%
5 years +1,006.7%-83.5%+31.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +61.8%-30.3%+5.6% +11.0%
10 years +2,340.5%-92.3%+179.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year +37.6%-22.7%+10.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLITETRCKLFUSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 98.8%196.2%43.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 100.3%282.5%44.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.16-1.681.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.650.121.10 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.5%-97.9%-54.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.4%-43.2%-20.8% -0.9%
52-week high $1,133.40$0.81$489.10 $779.14
52-week low $188.36$0.17$234.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLITETRCKLFUS
P/E now vs peer median -9.8xmedian 33.5x 0.7xmedian 33.5x 260.2xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 26.9xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 2.8x 3.6xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 100.4xmedian 19.6x 4.0xmedian 19.6x 33.2xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 269.8xmedian 29.8x 4.2xmedian 29.8x 18.6xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 2.9x 0.9xmedian 2.9x 3.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.10 0.01median 1.10 -5.13median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLITETRCKLFUS
Revenue $3.01B $36.25M $2.76B
Gross profit $1.26B $17.36M $1.10B
Operating income $524.80M $1.77M $151.43M
Net income -$6.94B $21.46M $37.79M
Free cash flow $300.10M $3.53M $528.88M
R&D $356.50M $2.75M $117.61M
EPS (diluted) $-92.99 $0.65 $1.47
Cash & equivalents $2.04B $8.39M $824.84M
Total debt $1.64B $17.58M $629.93M
Shares (diluted) 74.60M 32.85M 25.67M
Enterprise value $60.67B -$6.27M $7.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLITETRCKLFUS
P/E -9.8x 0.7x 260.2x
P/FCF 269.8x 4.2x 18.6x
P/Operating cash flow 107.8x 2.6x 16.5x
P/S 26.9x 0.4x 3.6x
P/B 17.4x 0.9x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 18.8x 7.0x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 100.4x 4.0x 33.2x
EV/EBIT 152.2x 13.6x 63.7x
EV/Revenue 26.5x 0.7x 3.5x
EV/FCF 266.2x 6.8x 18.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 106.3x 4.2x 16.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.01 -5.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLITETRCKLFUS
Revenue growth (1Y) 83.2% 1.1% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 1.1% 3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 173.1% -3.0% 28.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 3.6% 4.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 391.4% 154.0% -28.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 87.0% 36.0% -28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -26,876% 1,630% -68.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -274.9% 76.8% -50.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -25,088% 652.6% -68.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -264.1% 48.5% -50.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 494.9% -10.3% 30.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 17.3% 12.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 386.6% -18.6% 38.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 80.2% 122.1% 17.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLITETRCKLFUS
Gross margin 41.7% 47.9% 40.1%
EBITDA margin 26.4% 16.7% 10.5%
Operating margin 17.4% 4.9% 5.5%
Pretax margin -238.0% 59.4% 4.9%
Net margin -230.2% 59.2% 1.4%
FCF margin 10.0% 9.7% 19.2%
Operating cash flow margin 24.9% 15.9% 21.6%
Return on equity -182.1% 1,028% 1.4%
Return on assets -96.8% 52.0% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 5.5% 1.3%
Return on capital employed 11.2% 5.2% 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.3x 15.8x
Stock comp / revenue 5.6% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLITETRCKLFUS
Debt / assets 22.4% 41.0% 14.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x 1.5x -0.7x
Debt / FCF 5.5x 5.0x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 36.5% 61.8% 35.5%
Equity / assets 63.5% 38.2% 64.5%
Interest coverage 24.1x 0.7x 5.7x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.9x 2.7x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.8x 1.9x
Cash ratio 1.1x 1.2x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 17.67 -8.05 5.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLITETRCKLFUS
Dividend yield – – 0.8%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – -0.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLITETRCKLFUS
Forward P/E 43.0xFY2027 – 21.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $21.25FY2027 – $17.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +145.1%FY2027 – +66.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +61.4% – +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.52BFY2027 – $3.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +116.6%FY2027 – +30.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +62.9% – +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLITETRCKLFUS
Held by institutions 92.8% – 99.4%
Institutions holding 1,316 – 606
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.6% – +1.6%
Institutions buying 903 – 295
Institutions selling 318 – 209
Buyers to sellers 2.84 – 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LITETRCKLFUS
LITE 1.00 -0.04 0.59
TRCK -0.04 1.00 -0.05
LFUS 0.59 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LITE, TRCK and LFUS?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lumentum Holdings (LITE) $68.85B, Track (TRCK) $14.88M, Littelfuse (LFUS) $10.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, LITE, TRCK and LFUS?

Track (TRCK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -9.9x, Track (TRCK) 0.7x, Littelfuse (LFUS) 271.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Littelfuse (LFUS) is cheapest (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 43.0x, Littelfuse (LFUS) 21.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +83.2%, Track (TRCK) +1.1%, Littelfuse (LFUS) +18.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Track (TRCK) has the highest net margin (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -230.2%, Track (TRCK) 59.2%, Littelfuse (LFUS) 1.4%). On return on invested capital, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) leads (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 8.1%, Track (TRCK) 5.5%, Littelfuse (LFUS) 1.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lumentum Holdings (LITE) returned the most: Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +360.7%, Track (TRCK) +24.3%, Littelfuse (LFUS) +47.5%. Over five years, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) compounded fastest (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +61.8%/yr, Track (TRCK) -30.3%/yr, Littelfuse (LFUS) +5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 98.8%, Track (TRCK) 196.2%, Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LITE, TRCK and LFUS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.