LINE vs OMAB vs TRTN-PA Stock Comparison

Lineage, Central North Airport and Triton International Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LINE Lineage, Inc.
$37.02 +7.8% 1M -6.0% 1Y
Market cap
$8.44B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.37B
Div. yield
5.72%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lineage leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Lineage 4, Triton International 4, Central North Airport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLINEOMABTRTN-PALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.44B $5.06B $2.51B LINE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -49.9x 17.0x 3.6x TRTN-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.0% — +36.3% TRTN-PA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.1% — 528.7% TRTN-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 7.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.5x — 5.6x LINE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.72% 5.17% 0.00% LINE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.0% +6.2% -2.9% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +16.7%/yr -2.4%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 31.3% 8.2% TRTN-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 45/100 43/100 LINE

Percentile Scorecard

LINEOMABTRTN-PA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Valuation 83 #25 of 145 27 #100 of 137 89 #23 of 203
Growth 76 #35 of 144 – 22 #148 of 189
Profitability 26 #104 of 140 – 63 #70 of 187
Financial Health 56 #65 of 146 35 #96 of 147 8 #204 of 221
Shareholder Returns 77 #31 of 132 73 #24 of 85 33 #103 of 152
Overall 64 45 43
  • LINE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TRTN-PA ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLINEOMABTRTN-PASPY
1 month +7.8%+11.2%-2.8% -2.3%
3 months -11.6%-1.9%-4.5% -0.7%
6 months +4.9%+0.8%-3.8% +4.8%
Year to date +5.8%-3.7%-3.3% +10.3%
1 year -6.0%+6.2%-2.9% +10.3%
3 years —+59.0%-2.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+16.7%-0.9% +20.1%
5 years —+116.6%-11.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+16.7%-2.4% +10.1%
10 years —+137.0%— +258.6%
10 years, per year —+9.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLINEOMABTRTN-PASPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%31.3%8.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.4%27.7%9.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.991.050.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.160.20-0.35 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.1%-42.1%-15.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.9%-22.4%-6.2% -3.5%
52-week high $45.10$134.98$26.42 $779.14
52-week low $31.80$88.75$24.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLINEOMABTRTN-PA
P/E now vs peer median -49.9xmedian 26.3x 17.0xmedian 16.1x 3.6xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 4.2x 5.7xmedian 0.9x 34.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 14.4x —median 8.1x 7.8xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.6xmedian 23.9x 12.5xmedian 11.4x 5.0xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 8.0xmedian 1.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.98 —median 0.75 -0.26median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Revenue $5.37B – $72.04M
Gross profit $1.72B – $1.86M
Operating income $192.00M – $754.49M
Net income -$189.00M – $837.82M
Free cash flow $244.00M – $499.45M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 – $6.91
Cash & equivalents $58.00M $172.32M $62.50M
Total debt $6.22B $756.57M $6.35B
Shares (diluted) 228.00M – 55.10M
Enterprise value $9.16B $4.55B $2.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLINEOMABTRTN-PA
P/E -49.9x 17.0x 3.6x
P/FCF 34.6x 12.5x 5.0x
P/Operating cash flow 8.6x – 2.8x
P/S 1.6x 5.7x 34.8x
P/B 1.0x 8.0x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 1.1x -10.2x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x – 7.8x
EV/EBIT 76.1x – 11.7x
EV/Revenue 2.7x – 122.1x
EV/FCF 59.9x – 17.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.8x – 9.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.0% – 36.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -13.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.0% – -44.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -39.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 142.0% – -16.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -7.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 70.0% – -10.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.8% – -28.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -13.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.5% – -17.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -14.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% – 17.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -24.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Gross margin 32.0% – 2.6%
EBITDA margin 20.9% – 1,563%
Operating margin 3.6% – 1,047%
Pretax margin -3.5% – 677.9%
Net margin -3.1% – 528.7%
FCF margin 4.5% – 693.3%
Operating cash flow margin 18.4% – 1,252%
Return on equity -2.1% – 31.1%
Return on assets -1.0% – 8.6%
Return on invested capital – – 7.7%
Return on capital employed 1.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.2x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% – 20.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Debt / assets 32.9% 44.0% 65.3%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.2x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.5x – 5.6x
Debt / FCF 25.5x – 12.7x
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 63.1% 71.8%
Equity / assets 47.0% 36.9% 28.2%
Interest coverage – – 2.8x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score 0.60 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Dividend yield 5.7% 5.2% 0.0%
Net buyback yield – – -6.7%
Shareholder yield 5.7% 5.2% -6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 5.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 9.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 87.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -31.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Forward P/E – 15.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.77FY2026 $6.60FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.07BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +19.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLINEOMABTRTN-PA
Held by institutions 33.7% 12.3% –
Institutions holding 328 163 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.2% +5.4% –
Institutions buying 183 77 –
Institutions selling 93 59 –
Buyers to sellers 1.97 1.31 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LINEOMABTRTN-PA
LINE 1.00 0.23 0.03
OMAB 0.23 1.00 0.05
TRTN-PA 0.03 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LINE, OMAB and TRTN-PA?

Lineage (LINE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lineage (LINE) $8.44B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $5.06B, Triton International (TRTN-PA) $2.51B.

Which stock is cheaper, LINE, OMAB and TRTN-PA?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lineage (LINE) -49.9x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 17.0x, Triton International (TRTN-PA) 3.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lineage (LINE) +1.0%, Triton International (TRTN-PA) +36.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Triton International (TRTN-PA) has the highest net margin (Lineage (LINE) -3.1%, Triton International (TRTN-PA) 528.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: Lineage (LINE) -6.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) +6.2%, Triton International (TRTN-PA) -2.9%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.7%/yr, Triton International (TRTN-PA) -2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lineage (LINE) has the highest dividend yield: Lineage (LINE) 5.72%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.17%, Triton International (TRTN-PA) 0.00%. Triton International (TRTN-PA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Triton International (TRTN-PA) has been the steadiest (Lineage (LINE) 36.6%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.3%, Triton International (TRTN-PA) 8.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LINE, OMAB and TRTN-PA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lineage (LINE) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.