LINE vs OMAB vs REXR Stock Comparison

Lineage, Central North Airport and Rexford Industrial Realty Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LINE Lineage, Inc.
$35.75 -1.1% 1M -12.1% 1Y
Market cap
$8.07B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.37B
Div. yield
–
Industrial REITs Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Lineage leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Lineage 3, Rexford Industrial Realty 2, Central North Airport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLINEOMABREXRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.07B $4.78B $8.57B REXR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -47.7x 16.1x -21.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.0% — +0.5% LINE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.1% — -40.4% LINE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.1% -3.6% -9.9% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.2%/yr -10.6%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 31.2% 25.8% REXR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 46/100 49/100 LINE

Percentile Scorecard

LINEOMABREXR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLINEOMABREXR
Valuation 82 #27 of 145 28 #98 of 136 29 #103 of 145
Growth 77 #34 of 142 – 31 #98 of 142
Profitability 24 #104 of 136 – 15 #116 of 136
Financial Health 57 #60 of 139 34 #95 of 144 90 #15 of 139
Shareholder Returns 82 #25 of 131 74 #22 of 82 80 #27 of 131
Overall 64 46 49
  • LINE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • REXR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLINEOMABREXRSPY
1 month -1.1%-3.9%+1.4% -0.8%
3 months -16.0%-5.5%-1.9% +3.5%
6 months -1.1%-10.9%+5.6% +7.0%
Year to date +2.1%-9.0%-1.8% +12.2%
1 year -12.1%-3.6%-9.9% +13.0%
3 years —+74.4%-9.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+20.4%-3.2% +23.1%
5 years —+102.8%-42.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+15.2%-10.6% +11.0%
10 years —+104.2%+77.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+7.4%+5.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLINEOMABREXRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%31.2%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.3%28.1%23.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.001.120.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.33-0.12-0.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.1%-42.1%-62.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.7%-26.7%-10.6% -1.8%
52-week high $45.10$134.98$42.53 $779.14
52-week low $31.80$88.75$32.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLINEOMABREXR
P/E now vs peer median -48.2xmedian 27.4x 16.1xmedian 16.1x -21.2xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 4.2x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 8.5xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 14.2x —median 8.7x —median 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.4xmedian 23.2x 11.8xmedian 11.5x 37.3xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.11 —median 0.81 0.37median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLINEOMABREXR
Revenue $5.37B – $991.92M
Gross profit $1.72B – –
Operating income $192.00M – –
Net income -$189.00M – -$403.93M
Free cash flow $244.00M – $227.15M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 – $-1.79
Cash & equivalents $58.00M $172.32M $32.23M
Total debt $6.22B $1.84B $3.26B
Shares (diluted) 228.00M – 223.81M
Enterprise value $7.80B $4.27B $8.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLINEOMABREXR
P/E -48.2x 16.1x -21.2x
P/FCF 33.4x 11.8x 37.3x
P/Operating cash flow 8.3x – 16.6x
P/S 1.5x 5.4x 8.5x
P/B 0.9x 7.5x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.0x -9.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 12.8x – –
EV/EBIT 74.6x – –
EV/Revenue 2.7x – 11.8x
EV/FCF 58.7x – 51.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.5x – 23.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLINEOMABREXR
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.0% – 0.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 142.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 70.0% – -222.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -58.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.8% – -238.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -57.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.5% – -2.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 11.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% – 296.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLINEOMABREXR
Gross margin 32.0% – –
EBITDA margin 20.9% – –
Operating margin 3.6% – –
Pretax margin -3.5% – –
Net margin -3.1% – -40.4%
FCF margin 4.5% – 22.9%
Operating cash flow margin 18.4% – 51.3%
Return on equity -2.1% – -4.9%
Return on assets -1.0% – -3.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 1.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.2x – -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% – 8.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLINEOMABREXR
Debt / assets 32.9% 43.4% 28.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.5x – –
Debt / FCF 25.5x – 14.4x
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 63.1% 32.2%
Equity / assets 47.0% 36.9% 67.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score 0.58 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLINEOMABREXR
Dividend yield 5.9% 5.5% 4.5%
Net buyback yield – – 6.5%
Shareholder yield 5.9% 5.5% 11.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -99.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 176.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 17.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLINEOMABREXR
Forward P/E – 15.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.77FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $-1.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 -254.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.07BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $976.30MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 -0.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +19.6% -12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLINEOMABREXR
Held by institutions 33.7% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 327 163 420
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.2% +5.4% +1.3%
Institutions buying 183 77 193
Institutions selling 93 59 168
Buyers to sellers 1.97 1.31 1.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LINEOMABREXR
LINE 1.00 0.21 0.43
OMAB 0.21 1.00 0.06
REXR 0.43 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LINE, OMAB and REXR?

Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lineage (LINE) $8.07B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) $8.57B.

Which company is growing faster?

Lineage (LINE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lineage (LINE) +1.0%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) +0.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lineage (LINE) has the highest net margin (Lineage (LINE) -3.1%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -40.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: Lineage (LINE) -12.1%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -9.9%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lineage (LINE) 0.00%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 0.05%. Lineage (LINE) and Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) has been the steadiest (Lineage (LINE) 37.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LINE, OMAB and REXR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lineage (LINE) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.