LINE vs LOMA vs TRN Stock Comparison

Lineage, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima and Trinity Industries Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LINE Lineage, Inc.
$37.02 +7.8% 1M -6.0% 1Y
Market cap
$8.44B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.37B
Div. yield
5.72%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
5 wins
TRN Trinity Industries Inc
$30.49 +16.7% 1M +11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.38B
P/E
7.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
4.07%
Rail Equipment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lineage leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lineage 5, Trinity Industries 5, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLINELOMATRNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.44B $1.06B $2.38B LINE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -49.9x 65.4x 7.4x TRN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.8x 14.7x TRN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.0% — -2.4% LINE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.1% — 15.4% TRN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 8.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.5x — 5.0x TRN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.72% 0.00% 4.07% LINE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.0% -17.0% +11.4% TRN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.3%/yr +0.9%/yr LOMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 42.5% 37.1% LINE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 — 61/100 LINE

Percentile Scorecard

LINELOMATRN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLINELOMATRN
Valuation 83 #25 of 145 44 #6 of 10 78 #45 of 203
Growth 76 #35 of 144 – 74 #50 of 189
Profitability 26 #104 of 140 – 64 #68 of 187
Financial Health 56 #65 of 146 100 #1 of 9 4 #213 of 221
Shareholder Returns 77 #31 of 132 – 83 #27 of 152
Overall 64 – 61
  • LINE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • LOMA ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • TRN ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLINELOMATRNSPY
1 month +7.8%-0.5%+16.7% -2.3%
3 months -11.6%-20.0%-2.7% -0.7%
6 months +4.9%-13.1%-12.0% +4.8%
Year to date +5.8%-29.7%+15.3% +10.3%
1 year -6.0%-17.0%+11.4% +10.3%
3 years —+49.7%+27.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+14.4%+8.3% +20.1%
5 years —+29.3%+4.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+5.3%+0.9% +10.1%
10 years ——+101.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year ——+7.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLINELOMATRNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%42.5%37.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.4%35.8%35.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.991.110.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.16-0.400.31 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.1%-48.3%-43.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.9%-30.6%-20.0% -3.5%
52-week high $45.10$13.12$38.09 $779.14
52-week low $31.80$9.06$24.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLINELOMATRN
P/E now vs peer median -49.9xmedian 26.3x 65.4xmedian 21.2x 7.4xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 4.2x 1.8xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 14.4x —median 10.2x 7.3xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.6xmedian 23.9x 613.9xmedian 35.3x -9.2xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 1.4xmedian 2.5x 2.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.98 —median 3.48 0.11median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLINELOMATRN
Revenue $5.37B – $2.12B
Gross profit $1.72B – $521.30M
Operating income $192.00M – $731.90M
Net income -$189.00M – $334.90M
Free cash flow $244.00M – -$259.60M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 – $4.03
Cash & equivalents $58.00M – $158.30M
Total debt $6.22B $205.24M $5.33B
Shares (diluted) 228.00M 116.70M 81.00M
Enterprise value $9.16B $1.06B $1.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLINELOMATRN
P/E -49.9x 65.4x 7.4x
P/FCF 34.6x 613.9x -9.2x
P/Operating cash flow 8.6x – 5.6x
P/S 1.6x 1.8x 1.1x
P/B 1.0x 1.4x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.5x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x – 7.3x
EV/EBIT 76.1x – 10.3x
EV/Revenue 2.7x – 3.6x
EV/FCF 59.9x – -29.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.8x – 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLINELOMATRN
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.0% – -2.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.0% – -8.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 3.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 142.0% – 71.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 24.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 70.0% – 177.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 52.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.8% – 246.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 65.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.5% – 7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 15.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% – 33.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 19.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLINELOMATRN
Gross margin 32.0% – 24.6%
EBITDA margin 20.9% – 48.8%
Operating margin 3.6% – 34.5%
Pretax margin -3.5% – 21.9%
Net margin -3.1% – 15.4%
FCF margin 4.5% – -12.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.4% – 19.9%
Return on equity -2.1% – 29.4%
Return on assets -1.0% – 4.0%
Return on invested capital – – 8.5%
Return on capital employed 1.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.2x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLINELOMATRN
Debt / assets 32.9% 15.7% 63.8%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.3x 4.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.5x – 5.0x
Debt / FCF 25.5x – -20.5x
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 43.8% 86.4%
Equity / assets 47.0% 56.2% 13.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.4x –
Quick ratio 0.6x – –
Cash ratio 0.0x – –
Altman Z-score 0.60 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLINELOMATRN
Dividend yield 5.7% – 4.1%
Net buyback yield – – 2.3%
Shareholder yield 5.7% 0.0% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 29.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -38.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLINELOMATRN
Forward P/E – 17.8xFY2026 14.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.77FY2026 $0.51FY2026 $2.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +142.9%FY2026 -33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +45.1% -1.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.07BFY2026 $612.36MFY2026 $2.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +2.9% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLINELOMATRN
Held by institutions 33.7% 17.5% 95.3%
Institutions holding 328 58 345
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.2% -6.6% +6.3%
Institutions buying 183 26 171
Institutions selling 93 17 97
Buyers to sellers 1.97 1.53 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LINELOMATRN
LINE 1.00 0.25 0.22
LOMA 0.25 1.00 0.09
TRN 0.22 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LINE, LOMA and TRN?

Lineage (LINE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lineage (LINE) $8.44B, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) $1.06B, Trinity Industries (TRN) $2.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, LINE, LOMA and TRN?

Trinity Industries (TRN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lineage (LINE) -49.9x, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 65.4x, Trinity Industries (TRN) 7.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Trinity Industries (TRN) is cheapest (Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 17.8x, Trinity Industries (TRN) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lineage (LINE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lineage (LINE) +1.0%, Trinity Industries (TRN) -2.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trinity Industries (TRN) has the highest net margin (Lineage (LINE) -3.1%, Trinity Industries (TRN) 15.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Trinity Industries (TRN) returned the most: Lineage (LINE) -6.0%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) -17.0%, Trinity Industries (TRN) +11.4%. Over five years, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) compounded fastest (Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) +5.3%/yr, Trinity Industries (TRN) +0.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lineage (LINE) has the highest dividend yield: Lineage (LINE) 5.72%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 0.00%, Trinity Industries (TRN) 4.07%. Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lineage (LINE) has been the steadiest (Lineage (LINE) 36.6%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 42.5%, Trinity Industries (TRN) 37.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LINE, LOMA and TRN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lineage (LINE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.