LIMX vs KVUE vs KMB Stock Comparison

Limitless X Holdings, Kenvue and Kimberly Clark Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LIMX Limitless X Holdings Inc.
$0.25 0.0% 1M -88.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.63M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$511.81K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
KVUE Kenvue Inc.
$19.57 +9.3% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$37.23B
P/E
22.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.41B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
5 wins
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$110.02 +11.1% 1M -5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$36.14B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
0.05%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kenvue leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kenvue 5, Kimberly Clark 5, Limitless X Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLIMXKVUEKMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.63M $37.23B $36.14B KVUE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.4x 22.5x 18.5x KMB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.0x 14.4x KMB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -65.7% +1.8% +0.7% KVUE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2,249.5% 10.8% 11.8% KMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.2% 19.4% KMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 2.3x 1.7x LIMX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -88.5% +36.8% -5.7% KVUE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -66.5%/yr — -3.2%/yr KMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 142.7% 24.2% 29.2% KVUE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 21/100 61/100 55/100 KVUE

Percentile Scorecard

LIMXKVUEKMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLIMXKVUEKMB
Valuation 2 #51 of 52 59 #22 of 52 55 #24 of 52
Growth 35 #33 of 50 55 #23 of 50 45 #28 of 50
Profitability 14 #39 of 45 75 #12 of 45 82 #9 of 45
Financial Health 6 #53 of 56 44 #32 of 56 38 #35 of 56
Shareholder Returns 47 #17 of 31 73 #9 of 31 53 #15 of 31
Overall 21 61 55
  • LIMX ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KVUE ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLIMXKVUEKMBSPY
1 month 0.0%+9.3%+11.1% +0.7%
3 months -65.3%+1.4%-0.2% +3.7%
6 months -84.3%+11.6%+11.8% +7.1%
Year to date -80.0%+13.4%+9.0% +12.8%
1 year -88.5%+36.8%-5.7% +11.9%
3 years -71.6%+5.0%-7.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year -34.3%+1.6%-2.7% +22.8%
5 years -99.6%—-15.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -66.5%—-3.2% +10.9%
10 years -98.4%—-4.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year -33.7%—-0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLIMXKVUEKMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 142.7%24.2%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 350.8%20.9%32.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.870.050.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.621.52-0.20 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.8%-48.7%-37.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -88.6%-1.6%-8.5% -1.2%
52-week high $2.20$19.89$120.21 $779.14
52-week low $0.25$14.24$93.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLIMXKVUEKMB
P/E now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 18.7x 22.7xmedian 18.7x 18.7xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 13.0x 14.1xmedian 13.0x 13.0xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 18.9x 19.6xmedian 18.9x 20.1xmedian 18.9x
P/B now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 2.2x 3.6xmedian 2.2x 19.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 1.01 -4.57median 1.01 2.84median 1.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLIMXKVUEKMB
Revenue $511.81K $15.41B $16.58B
Gross profit $468.33K $8.97B $6.10B
Operating income -$8.10M $2.63B $2.51B
Net income -$38.64M $1.66B $1.99B
Free cash flow -$1.78M $1.91B $1.82B
EPS (diluted) $-0.62 $0.86 $5.87
Cash & equivalents $7.74K $1.11B $956.00M
Total debt $6.91M $8.48B $6.52B
Shares (diluted) 18.51M 1.92B 333.30M
Enterprise value $4.38M $32.84B $33.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLIMXKVUEKMB
P/E -0.4x 22.7x 18.7x
P/FCF -2.6x 19.6x 20.1x
P/Operating cash flow -2.7x 16.2x 11.0x
P/S 9.0x 2.4x 2.2x
P/B -0.5x 3.6x 19.5x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 17.5x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA -0.7x 14.1x 13.0x
EV/EBIT -0.7x 17.1x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 10.8x 2.9x 2.5x
EV/FCF -3.1x 23.5x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.3x 19.3x 12.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 -4.57 2.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLIMXKVUEKMB
Revenue growth (1Y) -65.7% 1.8% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -78.7% 0.0% -6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -43.4% 2.1% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -77.9% 1.7% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.5% 10.2% -5.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 24.5% -2.9% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.3% 16.9% -18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.1% -3.5% 6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 77.5% 17.2% -19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 41.2% -5.0% 6.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -91.5% 11.2% 16.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.8% – 1.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -101.6% 17.2% -13.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.9% – -8.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLIMXKVUEKMB
Gross margin 91.5% 58.2% 36.8%
EBITDA margin -1,496% 20.7% 19.5%
Operating margin -1,582% 17.1% 15.2%
Pretax margin -7,552% 14.4% 13.5%
Net margin -2,250% 10.8% 11.8%
FCF margin -347.5% 12.4% 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin -330.1% 15.1% 20.1%
Return on equity – 15.7% 105.0%
Return on assets -2,103% 6.2% 11.1%
Return on invested capital – 10.2% 19.4%
Return on capital employed – 12.6% 23.1%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.4x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLIMXKVUEKMB
Debt / assets 51.5% 31.7% 35.1%
Debt / equity -0.1x 0.8x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 2.3x 1.7x
Debt / FCF -0.5x 4.4x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 635.3% 60.5% 89.9%
Equity / assets -535.3% 39.5% 10.1%
Interest coverage -12.9x – 10.7x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.0x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -114.37 2.29 3.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLIMXKVUEKMB
Dividend yield – 5.3% 4.6%
Net buyback yield 2.2% 0.2% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 5.5% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 84.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 92.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLIMXKVUEKMB
Forward P/E – 16.0xFY2026 14.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.22FY2026 $7.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +13.0%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -0.8% -8.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $16.05BFY2026 $16.99BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.1%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +6.4% +5.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLIMXKVUEKMB
Held by institutions – 94.3% 96.8%
Institutions holding – 1,008 1,712
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.7% +9.1%
Institutions buying – 528 829
Institutions selling – 353 620
Buyers to sellers – 1.50 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LIMXKVUEKMB
LIMX 1.00 0.04 0.06
KVUE 0.04 1.00 0.44
KMB 0.06 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LIMX, KVUE and KMB?

Kenvue (KVUE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) $4.63M, Kenvue (KVUE) $37.23B, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, LIMX, KVUE and KMB?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) -0.4x, Kenvue (KVUE) 22.5x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimberly Clark (KMB) is cheapest (Kenvue (KVUE) 16.0x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kenvue (KVUE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) -65.7%, Kenvue (KVUE) +1.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest net margin (Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) -2,249.5%, Kenvue (KVUE) 10.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads (Kenvue (KVUE) 10.2%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kenvue (KVUE) returned the most: Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) -88.5%, Kenvue (KVUE) +36.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -5.7%. Over five years, Kimberly Clark (KMB) compounded fastest (Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) -66.5%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kenvue (KVUE) 0.00%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 0.05%. Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) and Kenvue (KVUE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kenvue (KVUE) has been the steadiest (Limitless X Holdings (LIMX) 142.7%, Kenvue (KVUE) 24.2%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LIMX, KVUE and KMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kenvue (KVUE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.