LIF vs SOUN vs TBTC Stock Comparison

Life360, Soundhound Ai and Table Trac Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LIF Life360, Inc.
$45.49 +13.6% 1M -53.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.62B
P/E
24.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$572.56M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins
SOUN Soundhound Ai, Inc.
$4.36 -25.3% 1M -76.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.20M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
1 win
TBTC Table Trac Inc
$5.20 -1.1% 1M +9.0% 1Y
Market cap
$25.30M
P/E
9.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.33M
Div. yield
–
Restaurant and Retail Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Table Trac leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Table Trac 4, Life360 2, Soundhound Ai 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLIFSOUNTBTCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.62B $1.80B $25.30M LIF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.6x -13.1x 9.5x TBTC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.0% +54.6% +15.3% SOUN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.7% -67.5% 20.1% LIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.5% -76.0% +9.0% TBTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +8.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.0% 68.7% 59.2% TBTC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 37/100 80/100 TBTC

Percentile Scorecard

LIFSOUNTBTC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLIFSOUNTBTC
Valuation 68 #40 of 124 20 #99 of 124 94 #6 of 89
Growth 100 #1 of 113 60 #46 of 113 60 #33 of 81
Profitability 69 #34 of 109 26 #81 of 109 84 #13 of 76
Financial Health 75 #33 of 127 67 #43 of 127 98 #3 of 93
Shareholder Returns – 11 #56 of 63 63 #19 of 50
Overall 78 37 80
  • LIF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SOUN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • TBTC ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLIFSOUNTBTCSPY
1 month +13.6%-25.3%-1.1% +0.7%
3 months -18.3%-29.0%+15.6% +3.7%
6 months +5.6%-45.2%+9.5% +7.1%
Year to date -29.1%-56.3%+23.2% +12.8%
1 year -53.5%-76.0%+9.0% +11.9%
3 years —+177.7%+23.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+40.6%+7.4% +22.8%
5 years ——+47.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——+8.1% +10.9%
10 years ——+285.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+14.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLIFSOUNTBTCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.0%68.7%59.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 85.7%63.9%74.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.333.000.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.70-1.110.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.6%-93.5%-39.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.2%-76.0%-16.0% -1.2%
52-week high $99.32$18.15$6.19 $779.14
52-week low $38.10$4.24$3.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLIFSOUNTBTC
P/E now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 39.0x -13.7xmedian 39.0x 9.0xmedian 39.2x
P/S now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 4.6x 8.7xmedian 4.6x 1.8xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 129.9xmedian 32.7x -16.0xmedian 32.7x 5.3xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.8xmedian 27.4x -12.3xmedian 27.4x 20.9xmedian 20.3x
P/B now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 3.2x 3.6xmedian 3.2x 1.7xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.23 -0.67median 1.23 0.44median 1.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLIFSOUNTBTC
Revenue $572.56M $203.20M $13.33M
Gross profit $444.26M $85.94M $9.42M
Operating income $6.51M -$139.29M $2.96M
Net income $147.29M -$137.06M $2.68M
Free cash flow $103.24M -$142.38M $1.15M
R&D $152.42M $101.02M –
EPS (diluted) $1.72 $-0.31 $0.57
Cash & equivalents $267.06M $202.80M $8.15M
Shares (diluted) 85.59M 438.65M 4.68M
Enterprise value $2.05B $861.56M -$7.47M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLIFSOUNTBTC
P/E 25.0x -13.7x 9.0x
P/FCF 35.8x -12.3x 20.9x
P/Operating cash flow 35.4x -15.4x 20.4x
P/S 6.5x 8.7x 1.8x
P/B 6.0x 3.6x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 5.9x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 129.9x -16.0x 5.3x
EV/EBIT 526.5x -11.2x 5.4x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 7.7x 1.2x
EV/FCF 33.2x -10.9x 13.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.9x -13.6x 13.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 -0.67 0.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLIFSOUNTBTC
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.0% 54.6% 15.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 77.8% 10.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.8% 61.4% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 33.0% 47.1% 9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.6% 42.2% 68.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -12.5% 20.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 434.2% 39.1% 58.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 69.1% -7.1% 21.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 427.2% 44.4% 58.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.4% 20.6% 20.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 136.7% -2.1% -45.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 85.0% -12.0% 36.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 144.9% -26.2% -44.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% -20.1% 35.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLIFSOUNTBTC
Gross margin 77.6% 42.3% 70.6%
EBITDA margin 4.6% -47.7% 22.6%
Operating margin 1.1% -68.5% 22.2%
Pretax margin 2.5% -64.7% 25.4%
Net margin 25.7% -67.5% 20.1%
FCF margin 18.0% -70.1% 8.7%
Operating cash flow margin 18.2% -56.4% 8.9%
Return on equity 24.3% -28.8% 19.5%
Return on assets 14.1% -20.9% 17.1%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 0.7% -23.8% 20.0%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.8x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 12.1% 38.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLIFSOUNTBTC
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 26.6% 13.0%
Equity / assets 58.3% 73.4% 87.0%
Interest coverage – -350.0x –
Current ratio 5.6x 3.9x 16.6x
Quick ratio 3.6x 3.6x 13.6x
Cash ratio 2.5x 2.9x 9.6x
Altman Z-score 6.01 3.78 10.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLIFSOUNTBTC
Dividend yield – – 3.5%
Net buyback yield – -10.6% –
Shareholder yield – -10.6% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLIFSOUNTBTC
Forward P/E 34.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.32FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -45.7%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +25.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $718.60MFY2026 $225.08MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +46.8%FY2026 +33.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +19.2% +56.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLIFSOUNTBTC
Held by institutions 40.8% 39.0% –
Institutions holding 205 442 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% -2.7% –
Institutions buying 116 230 –
Institutions selling 65 121 –
Buyers to sellers 1.78 1.90 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LIFSOUNTBTC
LIF 1.00 0.36 0.12
SOUN 0.36 1.00 0.09
TBTC 0.12 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LIF, SOUN and TBTC?

Life360 (LIF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Life360 (LIF) $3.62B, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) $1.80B, Table Trac (TBTC) $25.30M.

Which stock is cheaper, LIF, SOUN and TBTC?

Table Trac (TBTC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Life360 (LIF) 24.6x, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -13.1x, Table Trac (TBTC) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Soundhound Ai (SOUN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Life360 (LIF) +34.0%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) +54.6%, Table Trac (TBTC) +15.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Life360 (LIF) has the highest net margin (Life360 (LIF) 25.7%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -67.5%, Table Trac (TBTC) 20.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Table Trac (TBTC) returned the most: Life360 (LIF) -53.5%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -76.0%, Table Trac (TBTC) +9.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Table Trac (TBTC) has been the steadiest (Life360 (LIF) 77.0%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) 68.7%, Table Trac (TBTC) 59.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LIF, SOUN and TBTC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Table Trac (TBTC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.