LIF vs BBAI vs AI Stock Comparison

Life360, BigBear.ai Holdings and C3.ai Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LIF Life360, Inc.
$45.23 +11.0% 1M -50.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.57B
P/E
24.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$572.56M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
4 wins
AI C3.ai, Inc.
$12.43 +14.2% 1M -30.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.98B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$232.38M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Life360 leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Life360 4, C3.ai 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLIFBBAIAILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.57B $1.01B $1.98B LIF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.2x -11.8x -4.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.0% -13.7% -37.5% LIF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.7% -65.2% -192.1% LIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -15.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -50.5% -68.6% -30.8% AI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -22.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.0% 76.8% 59.4% AI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 31/100 28/100 LIF

Percentile Scorecard

LIFBBAIAI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLIFBBAIAI
Valuation 71 #37 of 124 27 #91 of 124 16 #104 of 124
Growth 100 #1 of 113 12 #100 of 113 7 #105 of 113
Profitability 70 #34 of 110 26 #82 of 110 13 #96 of 110
Financial Health 75 #33 of 129 87 #18 of 129 85 #20 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 5 #65 of 68 19 #55 of 68
Overall 79 31 28
  • LIF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • BBAI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLIFBBAIAISPY
1 month +11.0%-25.5%+14.2% -1.0%
3 months -7.4%-23.1%+52.5% +2.9%
6 months -1.2%-42.4%+43.9% +6.4%
Year to date -29.5%-60.6%-7.8% +11.4%
1 year -50.5%-68.6%-30.8% +13.1%
3 years —+60.2%-53.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+17.0%-22.3% +21.5%
5 years ——-72.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year ——-22.9% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureLIFBBAIAISPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.0%76.8%59.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 85.9%72.5%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.373.232.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.89-0.52 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.6%-95.0%-84.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.5%-70.3%-32.3% -2.5%
52-week high $99.32$7.17$18.36 $779.14
52-week low $38.10$2.12$7.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLIFBBAIAI
P/E now vs peer median 24.9xmedian 37.4x -11.9xmedian 37.4x -4.3xmedian 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 4.4x 7.8xmedian 4.4x 8.3xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 129.1xmedian 35.0x -5.6xmedian 35.0x -2.8xmedian 35.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.6xmedian 27.2x -14.0xmedian 27.2x -12.4xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.27 -0.36median 1.27 0.51median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLIFBBAIAI
Revenue $572.56M $131.63M $232.38M
Gross profit $444.26M $36.75M $67.61M
Operating income $6.51M -$155.20M -$471.95M
Net income $147.29M -$85.82M -$446.41M
Free cash flow $103.24M -$72.70M -$155.78M
R&D $152.42M $21.29M $210.99M
EPS (diluted) $1.72 $-0.18 $-2.88
Cash & equivalents $267.06M $36.28M $136.44M
Total debt – $16.64M –
Shares (diluted) 85.59M 479.12M 155.00M
Enterprise value $2.00B -$399.45M -$543.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLIFBBAIAI
P/E 24.9x -11.9x -4.3x
P/FCF 35.6x -14.0x -12.4x
P/Operating cash flow 35.2x -14.3x -12.5x
P/S 6.4x 7.8x 8.3x
P/B 6.0x 1.3x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 1.6x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 129.1x -5.6x -2.8x
EV/EBIT 523.2x -4.6x -2.7x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 5.5x 5.5x
EV/FCF 33.0x -9.9x -8.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.7x -10.0x -8.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 -0.36 0.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLIFBBAIAI
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.0% -13.7% -37.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.9% -6.6% -5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.8% -13.9% -67.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 33.0% -4.9% -27.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.6% -19.2% -25.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -36.5% -17.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 434.2% 80.7% -30.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 69.1% 0.0% -19.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 427.2% 87.1% -13.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.4% 32.8% -8.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 136.7% -163.0% -86.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 85.0% -19.7% -28.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 144.9% -163.1% -81.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% -20.1% -3.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLIFBBAIAI
Gross margin 77.6% 27.9% 29.1%
EBITDA margin 4.6% -97.7% -197.3%
Operating margin 1.1% -117.9% -203.1%
Pretax margin 2.5% -81.7% -191.8%
Net margin 25.7% -65.2% -192.1%
FCF margin 18.0% -55.2% -67.0%
Operating cash flow margin 18.2% -54.4% -66.5%
Return on equity 24.3% -11.0% -66.2%
Return on assets 14.1% -10.1% -52.8%
Return on invested capital – -15.5% –
Return on capital employed 0.7% -19.8% -65.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.8x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 12.1% 15.0% 111.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLIFBBAIAI
Debt / assets – 2.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.4x –
Debt / FCF – -0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 8.4% 20.6%
Equity / assets 58.3% 91.6% 79.4%
Interest coverage – -16.9x –
Current ratio 5.6x 5.7x 6.2x
Quick ratio 3.6x 5.3x 6.0x
Cash ratio 2.5x 4.9x 5.2x
Altman Z-score 5.98 7.04 2.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLIFBBAIAI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -33.5% -4.6%
Shareholder yield – -33.5% -4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLIFBBAIAI
Forward P/E 34.3xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.32FY2026 $-0.25FY2026 $-0.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -45.7%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +25.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $718.60MFY2026 $140.77MFY2026 $207.24MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.8%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026 -17.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.2% +23.8% +11.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLIFBBAIAI
Held by institutions 40.8% 39.1% 62.6%
Institutions holding 205 328 320
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% +1.0% +14.5%
Institutions buying 116 185 179
Institutions selling 65 90 72
Buyers to sellers 1.78 2.06 2.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LIFBBAIAI
LIF 1.00 0.30 0.25
BBAI 0.30 1.00 0.50
AI 0.25 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LIF, BBAI and AI?

Life360 (LIF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Life360 (LIF) $3.57B, BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) $1.01B, C3.ai (AI) $1.98B.

Which company is growing faster?

Life360 (LIF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Life360 (LIF) +34.0%, BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) -13.7%, C3.ai (AI) -37.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Life360 (LIF) has the highest net margin (Life360 (LIF) 25.7%, BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) -65.2%, C3.ai (AI) -192.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year C3.ai (AI) returned the most: Life360 (LIF) -50.5%, BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) -68.6%, C3.ai (AI) -30.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, C3.ai (AI) has been the steadiest (Life360 (LIF) 77.0%, BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) 76.8%, C3.ai (AI) 59.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LIF, BBAI and AI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Life360 (LIF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.