LH vs TMO vs BLLN Stock Comparison

Labcorp Holdings, Thermo Fisher Scientific and BillionToOne Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LH Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$331.39 +7.1% 1M +20.2% 1Y
Market cap
$26.81B
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.35B
Div. yield
0.87%
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
6 wins
BLLN BillionToOne, Inc.
$114.07 -7.3% 1M
Market cap
$5.34B
P/E
176.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Labcorp Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Labcorp Holdings 6, BillionToOne 4, Thermo Fisher Scientific 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLHTMOBLLNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.81B $256.36B $5.34B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.0x 36.4x 176.1x LH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.4x 26.8x 150.1x LH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.4% +8.3% +90.1% BLLN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% — 7.6% BLLN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% — 7.0% LH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — -9.1x BLLN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.87% 0.27% — LH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.2% +23.0% — TMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.2%/yr +2.3%/yr — LH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.0% 29.8% 94.5% LH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 51/100 57/100 BLLN

Percentile Scorecard

LHTMOBLLN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLHTMOBLLN
Valuation 62 #36 of 92 50 #113 of 227 20 #74 of 92
Growth 30 #61 of 87 41 #130 of 219 100 #1 of 87
Profitability 68 #28 of 86 70 #63 of 206 60 #35 of 86
Financial Health 47 #52 of 97 – 97 #4 of 97
Shareholder Returns 73 #16 of 56 44 #76 of 134 7 #52 of 56
Overall 56 51 57
  • LH ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • TMO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • BLLN ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLHTMOBLLNSPY
1 month +7.1%+2.9%-7.3% -0.2%
3 months +5.4%+20.3%-14.6% +3.9%
6 months +27.7%+47.4%+45.8% +8.2%
Year to date +32.1%+19.7%+39.4% +12.9%
1 year +20.2%+23.0%— +12.3%
3 years +66.6%+60.7%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +18.6%+17.1%— +23.3%
5 years +35.2%+11.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +6.2%+2.3%— +10.9%
10 years +211.2%+364.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.0%+16.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLHTMOBLLNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.0%29.8%94.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.1%28.3%107.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.340.621.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.840.77— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.0%-41.5%-50.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%-0.5%-23.9% -1.2%
52-week high $339.40$696.55$149.97 $779.14
52-week low $246.64$438.34$64.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLHTMOBLLN
P/E now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 24.6x 36.4xmedian 29.6x 176.1xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.6x 5.4xmedian 2.9x 13.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 14.6x —median 17.4x 97.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 21.6x 34.0xmedian 22.3x 161.0xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.2x 4.7xmedian 2.3x 10.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.87median 0.66 4.80median 1.04 —median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLHTMOBLLN
Revenue $14.35B $47.35B $397.41M
Gross profit $4.14B – $283.22M
Operating income $1.50B $8.47B $43.30M
Net income $1.00B $7.09B $37.71M
Free cash flow $1.16B – $33.18M
R&D – $1.40B $59.21M
EPS (diluted) $12.22 $19.06 $0.55
Cash & equivalents $141.80M $5.46B $548.63M
Total debt $5.86B – $91.03M
Shares (diluted) 82.00M 371.00M 54.46M
Enterprise value $24.57B $256.48B $3.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLHTMOBLLN
P/E 27.0x 36.4x 176.1x
P/FCF 23.2x 34.0x 161.0x
P/Operating cash flow 16.4x 27.5x 117.8x
P/S 1.9x 5.4x 13.4x
P/B 3.1x 4.7x 10.0x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 7.0x 10.0x
EV/EBITDA 14.8x – 97.2x
EV/EBIT 21.7x – 112.8x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 5.4x 12.3x
EV/FCF 28.2x – 147.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.9x 27.5x 107.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.87 4.80 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLHTMOBLLN
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.4% 8.3% 90.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 2.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.2% – 122.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.6% 12.8% 253.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 7.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 31.3% 7.9% 223.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 6.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 34.3% 9.7% 118.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 7.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.3% 21.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 4.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLHTMOBLLN
Gross margin 28.9% – 71.3%
EBITDA margin 15.3% – 12.6%
Operating margin 10.4% – 10.9%
Pretax margin 8.6% – 9.5%
Net margin 7.0% – 7.6%
FCF margin 8.1% – 8.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.4% 19.7% 11.4%
Return on equity 11.6% 13.2% 7.2%
Return on assets 5.3% 6.2% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 8.2% – 7.0%
Return on capital employed 9.0% – 6.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 6.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLHTMOBLLN
Debt / assets 31.6% – 12.5%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – -9.1x
Debt / FCF 5.1x – 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 53.6% – 26.4%
Equity / assets 46.4% 47.9% 73.6%
Interest coverage 6.6x – 1,056x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.8x 11.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x – 11.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 9.8x
Altman Z-score 3.43 – 17.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLHTMOBLLN
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 2.4% – -5.7%
Shareholder yield 3.3% 0.3% -5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLHTMOBLLN
Forward P/E 19.4xFY2026 26.8xFY2026 150.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.07FY2026 $25.91FY2026 $0.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026 +442.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.3% +2.0% +22.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $14.31BFY2026 $50.12BFY2026 $481.76MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +57.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% -2.8% +27.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLHTMOBLLN
Held by institutions 97.0% 90.2% 32.6%
Institutions holding 1,051 2,622 155
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +0.8% +34.7%
Institutions buying 465 1,142 127
Institutions selling 393 1,144 13
Buyers to sellers 1.18 1.00 9.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LHTMOBLLN
LH 1.00 0.44 0.09
TMO 0.44 1.00 0.19
BLLN 0.09 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LH, TMO and BLLN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Labcorp Holdings (LH) $26.81B, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $256.36B, BillionToOne (BLLN) $5.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, LH, TMO and BLLN?

Labcorp Holdings (LH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Labcorp Holdings (LH) 27.0x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.4x, BillionToOne (BLLN) 176.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Labcorp Holdings (LH) is cheapest (Labcorp Holdings (LH) 19.4x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.8x, BillionToOne (BLLN) 150.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

BillionToOne (BLLN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Labcorp Holdings (LH) +6.4%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, BillionToOne (BLLN) +90.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

BillionToOne (BLLN) has the highest net margin (Labcorp Holdings (LH) 7.0%, BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.6%). On return on invested capital, Labcorp Holdings (LH) leads (Labcorp Holdings (LH) 8.2%, BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) returned the most: Labcorp Holdings (LH) +20.2%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +23.0%. Over five years, Labcorp Holdings (LH) compounded fastest (Labcorp Holdings (LH) +6.2%/yr, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Labcorp Holdings (LH) has the highest dividend yield: Labcorp Holdings (LH) 0.87%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.27%. BillionToOne (BLLN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Labcorp Holdings (LH) has been the steadiest (Labcorp Holdings (LH) 24.0%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.8%, BillionToOne (BLLN) 94.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LH, TMO and BLLN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Labcorp Holdings (LH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.