LGN vs OTIS vs RTO Stock Comparison

Legence, Otis Worldwide and Rentokil Initial Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LGN Legence Corp.
$41.89 -22.0% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
1 win
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corp
$74.64 +13.7% 1M -20.1% 1Y
Market cap
$28.86B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.14B
Div. yield
0.02%
Building Products Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Otis Worldwide leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Otis Worldwide 7, Rentokil Initial 1, Legence 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLGNOTISRTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.95B $28.86B $11.75B OTIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -44.4x 18.5x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.4x 19.1x 16.3x RTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +5.8% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.0% 10.3% — OTIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.1% 62.2% — OTIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 3.0x — OTIS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.8% -20.1% -15.4% LGN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.5%/yr -10.7%/yr OTIS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.0% 22.8% 34.5% OTIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 46/100 — OTIS

Percentile Scorecard

LGNOTISRTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLGNOTISRTO
Valuation 19 #45 of 55 54 #26 of 55 –
Growth – 52 #25 of 51 –
Profitability 15 #42 of 49 75 #13 of 49 –
Financial Health 20 #44 of 55 13 #48 of 55 –
Shareholder Returns – 36 #26 of 40 40 #40 of 66
Overall 18 46 –
  • LGN ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • OTIS ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • RTO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLGNOTISRTOSPY
1 month -22.0%+13.7%+16.2% +0.7%
3 months -30.0%+4.1%-4.1% +3.7%
6 months -51.8%-4.2%-31.3% +7.1%
Year to date -2.7%-14.6%-21.0% +12.8%
1 year +0.8%-20.1%-15.4% +11.9%
3 years —-2.5%-10.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year —-0.8%-3.6% +22.8%
5 years —-7.1%-43.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-1.5%-10.7% +10.9%
10 years ——+63.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+5.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLGNOTISRTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.0%22.8%34.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 78.5%23.4%36.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.790.210.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.88-0.45 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.7%-39.6%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.0%-20.3%-32.6% -1.2%
52-week high $102.27$93.62$34.52 $779.14
52-week low $33.32$64.07$19.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLGNOTISRTO
P/E now vs peer median -48.0xmedian 20.3x 18.3xmedian 20.3x —median 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.6x 1.9xmedian 1.6x —median 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 33.1xmedian 12.6x 14.4xmedian 12.6x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.9x 17.0xmedian 16.9x —median 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.0x -5.2xmedian 3.0x —median 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.13 2.65median 1.13 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLGNOTISRTO
Revenue $3.31B $15.14B –
Gross profit $644.45M $4.53B –
Operating income $38.41M $2.32B –
Net income -$90.65M $1.61B –
Free cash flow – $1.67B –
R&D – $158.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.87 $4.07 –
Cash & equivalents $291.98M $866.00M $2.47B
Total debt $4.30B $8.28B -$1.94B
Shares (diluted) 76.03M 381.90M 507.00M
Enterprise value $2.17B $25.25B $5.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLGNOTISRTO
P/E -48.0x 18.3x –
P/FCF – 17.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – 15.5x –
P/S 1.4x 1.9x –
P/B 4.6x -5.2x –
P/Tangible book 24.4x -4.9x –
EV/EBITDA 33.1x 14.4x –
EV/EBIT 137.2x 15.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.6x 2.4x –
EV/FCF – 21.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 19.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.65 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLGNOTISRTO
Revenue growth (1Y) – 5.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 12.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 2.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 13.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 18.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 24.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLGNOTISRTO
Gross margin 19.5% 30.0% –
EBITDA margin 4.8% 16.5% –
Operating margin 1.2% 15.3% –
Pretax margin -1.9% 13.9% –
Net margin -2.0% 10.3% –
FCF margin – 11.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 12.1% –
Return on equity -10.5% – –
Return on assets -2.9% 14.4% –
Return on invested capital 2.1% 62.2% –
Return on capital employed 1.9% 73.0% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLGNOTISRTO
Debt / assets 27.7% 73.2% -13.4%
Debt / equity 1.1x -1.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 3.0x –
Debt / FCF – 4.9x –
Liabilities / assets 73.9% 148.0% –
Equity / assets 26.1% -48.0% –
Interest coverage 0.4x – –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.9x -683.2x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.7x -411.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x -411.8x
Altman Z-score 1.92 2.93 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLGNOTISRTO
Dividend yield – 2.3% 2.7%
Net buyback yield – 2.8% –
Shareholder yield – 5.1% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLGNOTISRTO
Forward P/E 30.4xFY2026 19.1xFY2026 16.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.38FY2026 $3.91FY2026 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -3.5%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +79.0% +22.3% +2.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.58BFY2026 $16.18BFY2026 $7.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +79.7%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.8% -3.5% +13.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLGNOTISRTO
Held by institutions 100.0% 93.1% 15.4%
Institutions holding 265 1,220 288
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.6% +3.6% +5.9%
Institutions buying 194 562 162
Institutions selling 58 450 90
Buyers to sellers 3.34 1.25 1.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LGNOTISRTO
LGN 1.00 -0.15 -0.07
OTIS -0.15 1.00 0.31
RTO -0.07 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LGN, OTIS and RTO?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Legence (LGN) $2.95B, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) $28.86B, Rentokil Initial (RTO) $11.75B.

Which company is more profitable?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has the highest net margin (Legence (LGN) -2.0%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 10.3%). On return on invested capital, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) leads (Legence (LGN) 2.1%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 62.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Legence (LGN) returned the most: Legence (LGN) +0.8%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -20.1%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -15.4%. Over five years, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) compounded fastest (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -1.5%/yr, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -10.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Legence (LGN) 0.00%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 0.02%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 0.00%. Legence (LGN) and Rentokil Initial (RTO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has been the steadiest (Legence (LGN) 73.0%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 22.8%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 34.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LGN, OTIS and RTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.