LGN vs AOS vs SPXC Stock Comparison

Legence, Smith A O and SPX Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LGN Legence Corp.
$41.89 -22.0% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.97B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
1 win
AOS Smith A O Corp
$63.51 +9.4% 1M -3.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.63B
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.80B
Div. yield
0.02%
HVAC Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Smith A O leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Smith A O 8, SPX Technologies 2, Legence 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLGNAOSSPXCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.97B $8.63B $8.08B AOS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -44.7x 17.5x 31.0x AOS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.4x 17.6x 19.5x AOS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -0.7% +20.2% SPXC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.0% 13.0% — AOS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.1% 20.8% — AOS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 0.6x — AOS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.8% -3.2% -16.2% LGN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.8%/yr +23.6%/yr SPXC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.0% 27.6% 41.5% AOS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 60/100 53/100 AOS

Percentile Scorecard

LGNAOSSPXC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLGNAOSSPXC
Valuation 19 #45 of 55 67 #19 of 55 17 #46 of 55
Growth – 32 #35 of 51 100 #1 of 51
Profitability 15 #42 of 49 90 #6 of 49 42 #29 of 49
Financial Health 20 #44 of 55 70 #17 of 55 –
Shareholder Returns – 41 #24 of 40 –
Overall 18 60 53
  • LGN ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • AOS ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • SPXC ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLGNAOSSPXCSPY
1 month -22.0%+9.4%-1.8% +0.7%
3 months -30.0%+6.2%-15.9% +3.7%
6 months -51.8%+2.7%-23.5% +7.1%
Year to date -2.7%-5.0%-16.3% +12.8%
1 year +0.8%-3.2%-16.2% +11.9%
3 years —-8.6%+110.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year —-3.0%+28.3% +22.8%
5 years —-13.1%+188.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-2.8%+23.6% +10.9%
10 years —+41.2%+785.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+3.5%+24.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLGNAOSSPXCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.0%27.6%41.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 78.5%26.3%41.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.790.701.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.11-0.39 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.7%-43.4%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.0%-21.1%-32.0% -1.2%
52-week high $102.27$80.47$246.41 $779.14
52-week low $33.32$55.34$160.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLGNAOSSPXC
P/E now vs peer median -48.0xmedian 20.3x 17.4xmedian 20.3x 31.0xmedian 20.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x 3.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 33.1xmedian 12.6x 11.8xmedian 12.6x —median 12.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.9x 15.2xmedian 16.9x 28.4xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.0x 4.7xmedian 3.0x 3.4xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.13 0.77median 1.13 —median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLGNAOSSPXC
Revenue $3.31B $3.80B $2.60B
Gross profit $644.45M $1.47B –
Operating income $38.41M $668.30M $418.10M
Net income -$90.65M $494.60M $298.10M
Free cash flow – $561.70M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.87 $3.63 –
Cash & equivalents $291.98M $234.50M $119.20M
Total debt $4.30B $673.10M –
Shares (diluted) 76.03M 136.10M 50.68M
Enterprise value $2.19B $7.82B $8.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLGNAOSSPXC
P/E -48.0x 17.4x 31.0x
P/FCF – 15.2x 28.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.9x 22.3x
P/S 1.4x 2.2x 3.2x
P/B 4.6x 4.7x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 24.4x 6.9x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA 33.1x 11.8x –
EV/EBIT 137.2x 13.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.6x 2.4x 3.2x
EV/FCF – 16.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 14.6x 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLGNAOSSPXC
Revenue growth (1Y) – -0.7% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% 15.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -7.2% 22.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.9% 46.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – -6.8% 33.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.2% 112.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – -3.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 22.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -6.6% 22.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.2% 58.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLGNAOSSPXC
Gross margin 19.5% 38.6% –
EBITDA margin 4.8% 20.1% –
Operating margin 1.2% 17.6% –
Pretax margin -1.9% 16.8% –
Net margin -2.0% 13.0% –
FCF margin – 14.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 16.1% 14.5%
Return on equity -10.5% 27.0% 12.4%
Return on assets -2.9% 13.6% 6.8%
Return on invested capital 2.1% 20.8% –
Return on capital employed 1.9% 24.0% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLGNAOSSPXC
Debt / assets 27.7% 18.4% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 0.6x –
Debt / FCF – 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 73.9% 50.1% –
Equity / assets 26.1% 49.9% 50.4%
Interest coverage 0.4x 26.4x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score 1.92 6.22 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLGNAOSSPXC
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 3.8% –
Shareholder yield – 6.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 40.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLGNAOSSPXC
Forward P/E 30.4xFY2026 17.6xFY2026 19.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.38FY2026 $3.60FY2026 $8.57FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -6.5%FY2026 +26.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +79.0% +15.0% +20.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.58BFY2026 $3.73BFY2026 $2.64BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +79.7%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.8% +3.9% +14.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLGNAOSSPXC
Held by institutions 100.0% 91.9% 93.8%
Institutions holding 265 615 511
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.6% +7.1% +10.8%
Institutions buying 194 316 276
Institutions selling 58 226 162
Buyers to sellers 3.34 1.40 1.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LGNAOSSPXC
LGN 1.00 -0.01 0.53
AOS -0.01 1.00 0.29
SPXC 0.53 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LGN, AOS and SPXC?

Smith A O (AOS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Legence (LGN) $2.97B, Smith A O (AOS) $8.63B, SPX Technologies (SPXC) $8.08B.

Which stock is cheaper, LGN, AOS and SPXC?

Smith A O (AOS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Legence (LGN) -44.7x, Smith A O (AOS) 17.5x, SPX Technologies (SPXC) 31.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Smith A O (AOS) is cheapest (Legence (LGN) 30.4x, Smith A O (AOS) 17.6x, SPX Technologies (SPXC) 19.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

SPX Technologies (SPXC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smith A O (AOS) -0.7%, SPX Technologies (SPXC) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Smith A O (AOS) has the highest net margin (Legence (LGN) -2.0%, Smith A O (AOS) 13.0%). On return on invested capital, Smith A O (AOS) leads (Legence (LGN) 2.1%, Smith A O (AOS) 20.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Legence (LGN) returned the most: Legence (LGN) +0.8%, Smith A O (AOS) -3.2%, SPX Technologies (SPXC) -16.2%. Over five years, SPX Technologies (SPXC) compounded fastest (Smith A O (AOS) -2.8%/yr, SPX Technologies (SPXC) +23.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Legence (LGN) 0.00%, Smith A O (AOS) 0.02%, SPX Technologies (SPXC) 0.00%. Legence (LGN) and SPX Technologies (SPXC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Smith A O (AOS) has been the steadiest (Legence (LGN) 73.0%, Smith A O (AOS) 27.6%, SPX Technologies (SPXC) 41.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LGN, AOS and SPXC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Smith A O (AOS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.