LFUS vs ZBRA vs COHR Stock Comparison

Littelfuse, Zebra Technologies and Coherent Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$351.39 -16.8% 1M +30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.21B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$386.45 +4.2% 1M +23.1% 1Y
Market cap
$18.31B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
4 wins
COHR Coherent Corp.
$209.24 -30.3% 1M +72.2% 1Y
Market cap
$39.28B
P/E
48.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.12B
Div. yield
0.00%
Electronic Components Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Coherent leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Coherent 6, Zebra Technologies 4, Littelfuse 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFUSZBRACOHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.21B $18.31B $39.28B COHR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,142x 34.0x 48.8x ZBRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x 17.1x 23.4x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.4% +12.7% +22.5% COHR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 9.2% 11.3% COHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 10.6% -23.3% ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 2.4x -0.4x COHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.5% +23.1% +72.2% COHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.6%/yr -6.1%/yr +29.0%/yr COHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.9% 47.2% 89.0% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 61/100 39/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

LFUSZBRACOHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFUSZBRACOHR
Valuation 59 #47 of 112 63 #42 of 112 21 #89 of 112
Growth 29 #78 of 109 48 #57 of 109 57 #47 of 109
Profitability 49 #54 of 105 85 #17 of 105 30 #74 of 105
Financial Health 63 #44 of 117 17 #97 of 117 43 #67 of 117
Shareholder Returns 33 #55 of 82 93 #7 of 82 44 #46 of 82
Overall 47 61 39
  • LFUS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ZBRA ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • COHR ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFUSZBRACOHRSPY
1 month -16.8%+4.2%-30.3% -1.0%
3 months -13.2%+48.7%-26.0% +2.9%
6 months -13.7%+69.7%-37.7% +6.4%
Year to date +38.9%+59.2%+13.4% +11.4%
1 year +30.5%+23.1%+72.2% +13.1%
3 years +57.6%+87.7%+567.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +16.4%+23.4%+88.3% +21.5%
5 years +19.4%-26.8%+256.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +3.6%-6.1%+29.0% +10.9%
10 years +179.5%+497.3%+700.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year +10.8%+19.6%+23.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureLFUSZBRACOHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.9%47.2%89.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.9%42.0%94.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.811.673.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.710.490.81 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-67.8%-62.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.2%-1.2%-51.0% -2.5%
52-week high $489.10$391.00$426.89 $779.14
52-week low $234.94$199.30$121.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFUSZBRACOHR
P/E now vs peer median -1,103xmedian 31.3x 34.2xmedian 31.3x 46.1xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.6x 3.1xmedian 2.6x 5.8xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 38.3xmedian 19.6x 19.5xmedian 19.6x -13.7xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 28.3x 20.2xmedian 28.3x -40.0xmedian 28.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.9x 5.3xmedian 2.9x 3.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 41.63median 1.15 -9.05median 1.15 0.91median 1.15

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFUSZBRACOHR
Revenue $2.61B $5.85B $7.12B
Gross profit $1.03B $2.90B $2.67B
Operating income $95.49M $858.00M -$3.60B
Net income -$8.06M $539.00M $800.94M
Free cash flow $444.35M $904.00M -$1.02B
R&D $115.22M $622.00M $722.95M
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $11.20 $4.12
Cash & equivalents $628.22M $157.00M $1.16B
Total debt $629.66M $2.77B $3.22B
Shares (diluted) 25.62M 48.13M 195.39M
Enterprise value $6.72B $16.87B $33.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFUSZBRACOHR
P/E -1,103x 34.2x 46.1x
P/FCF 20.1x 20.2x -40.0x
P/Operating cash flow 17.4x 18.7x 515.3x
P/S 3.4x 3.1x 5.8x
P/B 3.4x 5.3x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 6.7x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA 38.3x 19.5x -13.7x
EV/EBIT 93.5x 24.4x -11.7x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 3.6x 5.9x
EV/FCF 20.1x 23.1x -41.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.4x 21.3x 530.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 41.63 -9.05 0.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFUSZBRACOHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.4% 12.7% 22.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 2.1% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.4% 14.9% 30.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 4.2% 18.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -52.6% 8.1% 1.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.7% -0.9% 2.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -107.5% -1.6% 1,623%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.5% -6.1% 72.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -107.3% 4.8% 891.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.5% -3.8% 50.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 5.8% -87.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 63.5% -49.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.0% 6.0% -630.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 83.6% -92.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFUSZBRACOHR
Gross margin 39.3% 49.6% 37.5%
EBITDA margin 8.9% 18.3% -43.3%
Operating margin 3.7% 14.7% -50.6%
Pretax margin 3.0% 12.1% 11.9%
Net margin -0.3% 9.2% 11.3%
FCF margin 17.0% 15.5% -14.4%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% 16.7% 1.1%
Return on equity -0.3% 15.6% 7.1%
Return on assets -0.2% 6.4% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 10.6% -23.3%
Return on capital employed 2.8% 19.1% -24.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -63.5x 1.8x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 3.0% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFUSZBRACOHR
Debt / assets 15.7% 32.0% 17.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 2.4x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.4x 3.1x -3.1x
Liabilities / assets 34.7% 60.2% 38.6%
Equity / assets 65.3% 39.8% 61.4%
Interest coverage 3.2x – -18.9x
Current ratio 2.8x 0.5x 2.4x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.0x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 5.50 3.76 3.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFUSZBRACOHR
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield -1.1% 4.9% -5.0%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 4.9% -5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 1.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -1.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -25.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFUSZBRACOHR
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 17.1xFY2026 23.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $17.78FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $8.96FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +66.5%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 +59.7%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% -4.5% +61.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.11BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $11.19BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +30.3%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +57.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +1.2% +37.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFUSZBRACOHR
Held by institutions 99.4% 100.0% 86.7%
Institutions holding 606 644 1,309
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +4.5% -3.1%
Institutions buying 295 309 840
Institutions selling 209 242 359
Buyers to sellers 1.41 1.28 2.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFUSZBRACOHR
LFUS 1.00 0.31 0.65
ZBRA 0.31 1.00 0.20
COHR 0.65 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFUS, ZBRA and COHR?

Coherent (COHR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.21B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.31B, Coherent (COHR) $39.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, LFUS, ZBRA and COHR?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Littelfuse (LFUS) -1,142x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 34.0x, Coherent (COHR) 48.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 19.8x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 17.1x, Coherent (COHR) 23.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Coherent (COHR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Littelfuse (LFUS) +15.4%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Coherent (COHR) +22.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Coherent (COHR) has the highest net margin (Littelfuse (LFUS) -0.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Coherent (COHR) 11.3%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Coherent (COHR) -23.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Coherent (COHR) returned the most: Littelfuse (LFUS) +30.5%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +23.1%, Coherent (COHR) +72.2%. Over five years, Coherent (COHR) compounded fastest (Littelfuse (LFUS) +3.6%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.1%/yr, Coherent (COHR) +29.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.00%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%, Coherent (COHR) 0.00%. Littelfuse (LFUS) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 42.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.2%, Coherent (COHR) 89.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFUS, ZBRA and COHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Coherent (COHR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.