LFUS vs MKDW vs TTMI Stock Comparison

Littelfuse, MKDWELL Tech and Ttm Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$383.00 -10.8% 1M +40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.74B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins
MKDW MKDWELL Tech Inc.
$0.26 -82.8% 1M -95.9% 1Y
Market cap
$739.45K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$86.78 -32.8% 1M +47.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.44B
P/E
39.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 7, Littelfuse 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFUSMKDWTTMILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.74B $739.45K $9.44B LFUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,208x — 39.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x — 16.4x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.4% — +27.6% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% — 7.0% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — 10.6% TTMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — 1.0x LFUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.9% -95.9% +47.3% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.5%/yr — +46.2%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.3% 196.9% 90.4% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 — 60/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

LFUSMKDWTTMI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFUSMKDWTTMI
Valuation 58 #48 of 112 – 52 #54 of 112
Growth 29 #78 of 109 – 88 #14 of 109
Profitability 49 #54 of 104 – 61 #41 of 104
Financial Health 62 #45 of 116 0 #116 of 116 37 #74 of 116
Shareholder Returns 36 #52 of 81 – –
Overall 47 – 60
  • LFUS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • MKDW ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFUSMKDWTTMISPY
1 month -10.8%-82.8%-32.8% -0.2%
3 months -2.3%-97.7%-20.2% +3.9%
6 months -1.6%-96.5%-36.9% +8.2%
Year to date +51.4%-94.6%+25.8% +12.9%
1 year +40.9%-95.9%+47.3% +12.3%
3 years +77.0%-99.9%+653.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.0%-90.6%+96.1% +23.3%
5 years +30.7%—+566.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +5.5%—+46.2% +10.9%
10 years +177.8%—+536.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.8%—+20.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLFUSMKDWTTMISPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.3%196.9%90.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.9%236.7%97.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.851.383.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.95-0.490.52 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-99.9%-66.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.7%-97.8%-60.8% -1.2%
52-week high $489.10$12.00$221.47 $779.14
52-week low $234.94$0.26$58.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFUSMKDWTTMI
P/E now vs peer median -1,202xmedian 33.2x —median 33.2x 38.2xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x 2.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 41.7xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x 19.6xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 29.8x —median 29.8x -603.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.0x -0.3xmedian 3.0x 4.7xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 45.38median 1.17 —median 1.17 0.81median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFUSMKDWTTMI
Revenue $2.61B – $3.38B
Gross profit $1.03B – $715.64M
Operating income $95.49M – $334.16M
Net income -$8.06M – $236.78M
Free cash flow $444.35M – -$15.14M
R&D $115.22M – $29.71M
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 – $2.20
Cash & equivalents $628.22M $38.25K $507.91M
Total debt $629.66M $24.76M $3.72B
Shares (diluted) 25.62M 3.87M 107.58M
Enterprise value $7.25B -$10.22M $7.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFUSMKDWTTMI
P/E -1,202x – 38.2x
P/FCF 21.9x – -603.8x
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x – 28.3x
P/S 3.7x – 2.7x
P/B 3.7x -0.3x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 4.7x -0.3x 5.1x
EV/EBITDA 41.7x – 19.6x
EV/EBIT 101.9x – 28.8x
EV/Revenue 3.7x – 2.8x
EV/FCF 21.9x – -634.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.0x – 29.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 45.38 – 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFUSMKDWTTMI
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.4% – 27.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% – 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.4% – 33.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% – 18.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -52.6% – 94.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.7% – 47.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -107.5% – 154.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.5% – 48.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -107.3% – 147.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.5% – 47.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% – 35.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.0% – -185.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFUSMKDWTTMI
Gross margin 39.3% – 21.2%
EBITDA margin 8.9% – 14.5%
Operating margin 3.7% – 9.9%
Pretax margin 3.0% – 7.8%
Net margin -0.3% – 7.0%
FCF margin 17.0% – -0.4%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% – 9.6%
Return on equity -0.3% – 12.6%
Return on assets -0.2% – 5.6%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – 10.6%
Return on capital employed 2.8% – 11.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -63.5x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFUSMKDWTTMI
Debt / assets 15.7% 53.1% 22.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x -1.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – 1.0x
Debt / FCF 1.4x – -64.3x
Liabilities / assets 34.7% 132.7% 56.2%
Equity / assets 65.3% -32.7% 43.8%
Interest coverage 3.2x – 7.6x
Current ratio 2.8x 0.5x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.1x 1.4x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 5.85 – 3.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFUSMKDWTTMI
Dividend yield 0.8% – –
Net buyback yield -1.0% – –
Shareholder yield -0.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFUSMKDWTTMI
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 – 16.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.78FY2026 – $5.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +66.5%FY2026 – +115.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% – +53.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.11BFY2026 – $4.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.3%FY2026 – +46.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% – +60.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFUSMKDWTTMI
Held by institutions 99.4% – 92.4%
Institutions holding 606 – 638
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% – +0.6%
Institutions buying 295 – 396
Institutions selling 209 – 202
Buyers to sellers 1.41 – 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFUSMKDWTTMI
LFUS 1.00 0.09 0.70
MKDW 0.09 1.00 0.05
TTMI 0.70 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFUS, MKDW and TTMI?

Littelfuse (LFUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.74B, MKDWELL Tech (MKDW) $739.45K, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.44B.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Littelfuse (LFUS) +15.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Littelfuse (LFUS) -0.3%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads (Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: Littelfuse (LFUS) +40.9%, MKDWELL Tech (MKDW) -95.9%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.3%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Littelfuse (LFUS) +5.5%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +46.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.3%, MKDWELL Tech (MKDW) 196.9%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFUS, MKDW and TTMI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.