LECO vs SWK vs ESAB Stock Comparison

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Stanley Black & Decker and Esab Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ESAB ESAB Corp
$76.40 +9.2% 1M -34.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.88B
P/E
28.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.00B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lincoln Electric Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lincoln Electric Holdings 7, Stanley Black & Decker 4, Esab 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLECOSWKESABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.45B $18.13B $4.88B SWK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.9x 29.2x 28.5x LECO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.5x 18.0x 14.8x ESAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.1% +0.6% +9.7% LECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.4% 4.1% 5.7% LECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% 6.6% 6.2% LECO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 2.3x 4.7x LECO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.00% SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.8% +57.6% -34.6% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.1%/yr -10.7%/yr — LECO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 36.6% 47.4% LECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 58/100 35/100 SWK

Percentile Scorecard

LECOSWKESAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLECOSWKESAB
Valuation 35 #133 of 203 88 #26 of 203 57 #87 of 203
Growth 46 #102 of 189 80 #38 of 189 26 #140 of 189
Profitability 93 #14 of 187 52 #90 of 187 48 #97 of 187
Financial Health 46 #121 of 221 28 #159 of 221 21 #174 of 221
Shareholder Returns 55 #69 of 152 44 #86 of 152 21 #120 of 152
Overall 55 58 35
  • LECO ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • ESAB ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLECOSWKESABSPY
1 month +4.1%+16.9%+9.2% -2.3%
3 months +6.6%+8.8%-16.1% -0.7%
6 months +8.9%+42.6%-19.5% +4.8%
Year to date +19.1%+43.7%-31.6% +10.3%
1 year +21.8%+57.6%-34.6% +10.3%
3 years +55.2%+20.1%+1.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year +15.8%+6.3%+0.6% +20.1%
5 years +101.9%-43.0%— +61.9%
5 years, per year +15.1%-10.7%— +10.1%
10 years +349.3%-5.9%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +16.2%-0.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLECOSWKESABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%36.6%47.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.4%32.3%46.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.191.371.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.701.57-0.73 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.3%-71.6%-52.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.5%0.0%-43.3% -3.5%
52-week high $298.88$106.74$134.82 $779.14
52-week low $220.64$62.12$64.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLECOSWKESAB
P/E now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 25.6x 25.8xmedian 25.6x 27.4xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.9x 1.1xmedian 1.9x 1.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.0xmedian 14.4x 11.2xmedian 14.4x 15.0xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 22.5x 12.5xmedian 22.5x 24.2xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.87median 1.36 -4.91median 1.36 -3.79median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLECOSWKESAB
Revenue $4.64B $15.25B $3.00B
Gross profit $1.65B $4.86B $1.11B
Operating income $802.52M $1.32B $362.44M
Net income $575.27M $620.50M $178.52M
Free cash flow $511.89M $1.29B $196.61M
EPS (diluted) $10.48 $4.12 $2.78
Cash & equivalents $283.24M $592.40M $217.49M
Total debt $1.15B $4.76B $2.40B
Shares (diluted) 54.87M 150.65M 61.63M
Enterprise value $14.32B $16.66B $3.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLECOSWKESAB
P/E 27.0x 25.8x 27.4x
P/FCF 30.2x 12.5x 24.2x
P/Operating cash flow 23.2x 10.4x 18.3x
P/S 3.3x 1.1x 1.6x
P/B 9.9x 1.8x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 9.9x 2.7x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 18.0x 11.2x 15.0x
EV/EBIT 20.3x 15.4x 19.1x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 1.3x 2.3x
EV/FCF 31.9x 15.7x 35.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.5x 13.1x 26.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.87 -4.91 -3.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLECOSWKESAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.1% 0.6% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% -2.0% 3.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.7% 9.3% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 11.2% 5.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.9% 51.4% -16.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.0% 149.6% 0.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% 29.7% -32.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.9% -7.7% -6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.0% 30.7% -33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -5.3% -7.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.7% 104.3% -16.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 96.8% -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.3% 211.7% -23.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 110.2% -4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLECOSWKESAB
Gross margin 35.5% 31.9% 37.0%
EBITDA margin 19.5% 11.9% 15.4%
Operating margin 17.3% 8.6% 12.1%
Pretax margin 16.2% 5.6% 8.7%
Net margin 12.4% 4.1% 5.7%
FCF margin 11.0% 8.5% 6.5%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 10.2% 8.6%
Return on equity 37.0% 6.9% 7.4%
Return on assets 14.9% 3.0% 2.9%
Return on invested capital 22.6% 6.6% 6.2%
Return on capital employed 27.7% 8.0% 6.8%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 2.5x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLECOSWKESAB
Debt / assets 29.5% 23.7% 36.5%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.5x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 2.3x 4.7x
Debt / FCF 2.2x 3.7x 12.2x
Liabilities / assets 60.1% 55.4% 60.6%
Equity / assets 39.9% 44.6% 39.4%
Interest coverage – 2.8x 3.5x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 7.78 2.54 1.68

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLECOSWKESAB
Dividend yield 1.1% 3.1% 0.6%
Net buyback yield 1.8% 1.6% –
Shareholder yield 2.9% 4.8% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.0% 81.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.7% 39.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.5% 1.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 1.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLECOSWKESAB
Forward P/E 24.5xFY2026 18.0xFY2026 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.62FY2026 $5.81FY2026 $5.13FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026 -2.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.4% +5.2% +27.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.84BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026 $2.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.5% +0.4% +19.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLECOSWKESAB
Held by institutions 81.3% 95.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 703 773 349
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.5% +5.3% +11.0%
Institutions buying 299 418 187
Institutions selling 266 244 111
Buyers to sellers 1.12 1.71 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LECOSWKESAB
LECO 1.00 0.57 0.69
SWK 0.57 1.00 0.65
ESAB 0.69 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LECO, SWK and ESAB?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) $15.45B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $18.13B, Esab (ESAB) $4.88B.

Which stock is cheaper, LECO, SWK and ESAB?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 26.9x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 29.2x, Esab (ESAB) 28.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Esab (ESAB) is cheapest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 24.5x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 18.0x, Esab (ESAB) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +11.1%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.6%, Esab (ESAB) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has the highest net margin (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 12.4%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 4.1%, Esab (ESAB) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 22.6%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 6.6%, Esab (ESAB) 6.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +21.8%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +57.6%, Esab (ESAB) -34.6%. Over five years, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) compounded fastest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +15.1%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -10.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 0.01%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 0.03%, Esab (ESAB) 0.00%. Esab (ESAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has been the steadiest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 31.1%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 36.6%, Esab (ESAB) 47.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LECO, SWK and ESAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.