LECO vs NNDM vs SSYS Stock Comparison

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Nano Dimension and Stratasys Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.39 -12.0% 1M -14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$281.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
1 win
SSYS Stratasys Ltd.
$7.03 -17.4% 1M -36.7% 1Y
Market cap
$549.59M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$547.27M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lincoln Electric Holdings leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Lincoln Electric Holdings 9, Nano Dimension 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLECONNDMSSYSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.06B $281.56M $549.59M LECO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.2x -0.7x -12.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.5x — 70.3x LECO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.1% +73.5% -3.1% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.4% -349.5% -8.4% LECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% -28.1% — LECO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 2.4x — LECO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.3% -14.2% -36.7% LECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.8%/yr -25.1%/yr -25.9%/yr LECO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.8% 52.9% 47.6% LECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 48/100 37/100 LECO

Percentile Scorecard

LECONNDMSSYS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLECONNDMSSYS
Valuation 36 #131 of 203 39 #125 of 203 35 #132 of 203
Growth 46 #103 of 188 56 #83 of 188 22 #147 of 188
Profitability 95 #11 of 183 7 #171 of 183 13 #160 of 183
Financial Health 45 #120 of 216 91 #20 of 216 79 #46 of 216
Shareholder Returns 59 #63 of 152 – –
Overall 56 48 37
  • LECO ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SSYS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLECONNDMSSYSSPY
1 month +5.0%-12.0%-17.4% +0.7%
3 months +13.6%-9.7%-12.5% +3.7%
6 months +7.3%-19.7%-20.7% +7.1%
Year to date +18.7%-9.7%-19.0% +12.8%
1 year +21.3%-14.2%-36.7% +11.9%
3 years +62.9%-45.9%-31.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +17.7%-18.5%-12.0% +22.8%
5 years +99.7%-76.4%-77.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +14.8%-25.1%-25.9% +10.9%
10 years +334.1%-98.0%-63.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +15.8%-32.3%-9.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLECONNDMSSYSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.8%52.9%47.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.1%57.5%46.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.181.102.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.69-0.27-0.77 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.3%-80.4%-83.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-35.0%-39.5% -1.2%
52-week high $298.88$2.14$11.62 $779.14
52-week low $220.64$1.23$6.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLECONNDMSSYS
P/E now vs peer median 26.9xmedian 25.8x -0.7xmedian 25.8x -12.5xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x 1.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 14.6x 0.4xmedian 14.6x -11.8xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 22.2x -5.7xmedian 22.2x -26.1xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 2.2x 0.6xmedian 2.2x 0.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.85median 1.45 0.00median 1.45 -28.74median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLECONNDMSSYS
Revenue $4.64B $120.89M $547.27M
Gross profit $1.65B $46.88M $221.15M
Operating income $802.52M -$143.53M -$83.46M
Net income $575.27M -$139.91M -$115.18M
Free cash flow $511.89M -$51.44M -$23.24M
R&D – $29.99M $77.20M
EPS (diluted) $10.48 $-2.02 $-0.56
Cash & equivalents $283.24M $349.11M $92.53M
Total debt $1.15B $14.82M –
Shares (diluted) 54.87M 209.34M 82.30M
Enterprise value $13.93B -$929.61M -$400.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLECONNDMSSYS
P/E 26.9x -0.7x -12.5x
P/FCF 30.1x -5.7x -26.1x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x -5.8x -132.1x
P/S 3.3x 2.4x 1.1x
P/B 9.9x 0.6x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 9.9x 0.6x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.9x 0.4x -11.8x
EV/EBIT 20.3x 0.4x -4.7x
EV/Revenue 3.5x -0.4x 0.7x
EV/FCF 31.8x 1.0x -16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.4x 1.0x -85.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.85 0.00 -28.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLECONNDMSSYS
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.1% 73.5% -3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 32.6% -4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.7% 88.5% -12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 27.7% -6.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.9% -9.4% -30.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -35.0% -9.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% -154.9% -17.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 0.6% -37.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.0% -112.0% 59.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -428.7% 0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.7% 25.6% -172.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 21.5% 61.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.3% 28.4% -116.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 17.8% 36.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLECONNDMSSYS
Gross margin 35.5% 38.8% 40.4%
EBITDA margin 19.5% -117.1% -6.1%
Operating margin 17.3% -118.7% -15.3%
Pretax margin 16.2% -121.7% -13.1%
Net margin 12.4% -349.5% -8.4%
FCF margin 11.0% -42.6% -4.2%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% -41.9% -0.8%
Return on equity 37.0% -33.8% -14.0%
Return on assets 14.9% -28.9% -10.9%
Return on invested capital 22.6% -28.1% –
Return on capital employed 27.7% -27.7% -9.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.4x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 6.6% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLECONNDMSSYS
Debt / assets 29.5% 0.6% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF 2.2x -0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 60.1% 13.5% 22.0%
Equity / assets 39.9% 86.5% 78.0%
Interest coverage – -341.7x –
Current ratio 1.9x 10.7x 3.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 8.0x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 7.5x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 7.76 – -1.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLECONNDMSSYS
Dividend yield 1.1% – –
Net buyback yield 1.8% – –
Shareholder yield 2.9% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLECONNDMSSYS
Forward P/E 24.5xFY2026 – 70.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.62FY2026 – $0.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 – -33.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.4% – +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.84BFY2026 – $582.47MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 – +5.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.5% – +6.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLECONNDMSSYS
Held by institutions 81.3% 31.9% 50.8%
Institutions holding 702 108 150
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.5% +13.9% +7.3%
Institutions buying 298 51 79
Institutions selling 266 25 29
Buyers to sellers 1.12 2.04 2.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LECONNDMSSYS
LECO 1.00 0.07 0.40
NNDM 0.07 1.00 0.38
SSYS 0.40 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LECO, NNDM and SSYS?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) $15.06B, Nano Dimension (NNDM) $281.56M, Stratasys (SSYS) $549.59M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +11.1%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%, Stratasys (SSYS) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has the highest net margin (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 12.4%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%, Stratasys (SSYS) -8.4%). On return on invested capital, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 22.6%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -28.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) returned the most: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +21.3%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -14.2%, Stratasys (SSYS) -36.7%. Over five years, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) compounded fastest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +14.8%/yr, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -25.1%/yr, Stratasys (SSYS) -25.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 0.01%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 0.00%, Stratasys (SSYS) 0.00%. Nano Dimension (NNDM) and Stratasys (SSYS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has been the steadiest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 30.8%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 52.9%, Stratasys (SSYS) 47.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LECO, NNDM and SSYS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.