LDOS vs RTX vs TDG Stock Comparison

Leidos Holdings, Rtx and TransDigm Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$139.91 +13.2% 1M -26.3% 1Y
Market cap
$17.59B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.63B
Div. yield
0.01%
Defense Industrials
3 wins
RTX RTX Corp
$197.48 +4.3% 1M +10.5% 1Y
Market cap
$262.99B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$95.99B
Div. yield
0.01%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
6 wins
TDG TransDigm Group INC
$1,129.53 +1.2% 1M -16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$64.97B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.01B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Rtx leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Rtx 6, Leidos Holdings 3, TransDigm 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLDOSRTXTDGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.59B $262.99B $64.97B RTX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.8x 31.3x 34.0x LDOS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.0x 27.7x 25.7x LDOS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.4% +11.6% +16.6% TDG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 8.8% 19.1% TDG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.9% 8.6% 15.5% TDG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 6.1x RTX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% RTX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.3% +10.5% -16.9% RTX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.2%/yr +17.3%/yr +12.4%/yr RTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.6% 25.1% 27.2% RTX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 57/100 66/100 LDOS

Percentile Scorecard

LDOSRTXTDG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLDOSRTXTDG
Valuation 98 #3 of 100 64 #37 of 100 54 #47 of 100
Growth 57 #42 of 97 77 #23 of 97 68 #32 of 97
Profitability 85 #15 of 96 72 #28 of 96 96 #5 of 96
Financial Health 34 #70 of 105 30 #74 of 105 17 #87 of 105
Shareholder Returns 75 #17 of 64 43 #37 of 64 95 #4 of 64
Overall 70 57 66
  • LDOS ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • RTX ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • TDG ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLDOSRTXTDGSPY
1 month +13.2%+4.3%+1.2% -0.8%
3 months +21.6%-9.6%-12.2% +3.5%
6 months -3.0%+13.9%-2.5% +7.0%
Year to date -22.4%+7.7%-15.1% +12.2%
1 year -26.3%+10.5%-16.9% +13.0%
3 years +54.6%+149.5%+37.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +15.6%+35.7%+11.3% +23.1%
5 years +41.4%+121.5%+79.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.2%+17.3%+12.4% +11.0%
10 years +235.6%+210.6%+316.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.9%+12.0%+15.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLDOSRTXTDGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.6%25.1%27.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%23.9%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.280.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.740.42-0.62 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-33.9%-33.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.9%-12.4%-22.1% -1.8%
52-week high $199.55$225.49$1,450.00 $779.14
52-week low $100.00$168.02$1,076.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLDOSRTXTDG
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 26.8x 31.8xmedian 26.8x 33.9xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.9x 2.8xmedian 2.9x 6.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 15.2x 18.8xmedian 15.2x 18.4xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 25.5x 28.0xmedian 25.5x 32.4xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.5x 3.8xmedian 2.5x -6.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.94 0.78median 0.94 1.60median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLDOSRTXTDG
Revenue $17.63B $95.99B $10.01B
Gross profit $3.14B $20.25B $5.96B
Operating income $2.03B $11.30B $4.61B
Net income $1.40B $8.83B $2.13B
Free cash flow $2.16B $9.50B $1.93B
R&D – $2.85B –
EPS (diluted) $10.92 $6.14 $33.29
Cash & equivalents $748.00M $9.17B $2.77B
Total debt $21.66B $150.08B $33.49B
Shares (diluted) 126.00M 1.37B 57.40M
Enterprise value $14.30B $231.26B $52.97B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLDOSRTXTDG
P/E 12.8x 31.8x 33.9x
P/FCF 8.1x 28.0x 32.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.6x 21.4x 28.4x
P/S 1.0x 2.8x 6.2x
P/B 3.3x 3.8x -6.4x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 6.6x -4.3x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 18.8x 18.4x
EV/EBIT 11.3x 26.1x 20.2x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 3.1x 9.3x
EV/FCF 10.6x 31.0x 48.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x 23.7x 42.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 0.78 1.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLDOSRTXTDG
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.4% 11.6% 16.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 12.7% 17.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.8% 17.0% 16.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 20.2% 17.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.4% 28.2% 16.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.1% 51.1% 19.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.8% 27.6% 10.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.8% 39.1% 22.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.3% 26.6% 10.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 40.7% 21.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 54.9% 56.2% 4.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.7% 16.8% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.2% 81.4% 1.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.7% 21.2% 22.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLDOSRTXTDG
Gross margin 17.8% 21.1% 59.6%
EBITDA margin 13.2% 16.3% 50.7%
Operating margin 11.5% 11.8% 46.0%
Pretax margin 10.2% 11.3% 27.4%
Net margin 7.8% 8.8% 19.1%
FCF margin 12.3% 9.9% 19.3%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% 13.0% 22.0%
Return on equity 26.8% 12.7% –
Return on assets 9.0% 5.0% 8.2%
Return on invested capital 13.9% 8.6% 15.5%
Return on capital employed 16.5% 10.1% 19.6%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.4x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.7% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLDOSRTXTDG
Debt / assets 38.6% 21.2% 125.2%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.5x -3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 6.1x
Debt / FCF 2.8x 3.9x 17.4x
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 59.8% 136.7%
Equity / assets 34.1% 40.2% -36.7%
Interest coverage – – 2.5x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.0x 3.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.7x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 3.20 2.77 1.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLDOSRTXTDG
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.4% –
Net buyback yield 3.7% – 2.7%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 1.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 15.5% 43.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.0% 40.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.3% 9.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 5.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLDOSRTXTDG
Forward P/E 11.0xFY2026 27.7xFY2026 25.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.75FY2026 $7.14FY2026 $44.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +13.5%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.0% +6.7% +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.52BFY2026 $99.89BFY2026 $10.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026 +13.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.9% +2.4% +24.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLDOSRTXTDG
Held by institutions 79.3% 79.9% 93.2%
Institutions holding 773 3,413 1,140
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% +15.9% +1.2%
Institutions buying 380 1,717 584
Institutions selling 294 1,266 367
Buyers to sellers 1.29 1.36 1.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LDOSRTXTDG
LDOS 1.00 0.24 0.12
RTX 0.24 1.00 0.45
TDG 0.12 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LDOS, RTX and TDG?

Rtx (RTX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) $17.59B, Rtx (RTX) $262.99B, TransDigm (TDG) $64.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, LDOS, RTX and TDG?

Leidos Holdings (LDOS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 12.8x, Rtx (RTX) 31.3x, TransDigm (TDG) 34.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) is cheapest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 11.0x, Rtx (RTX) 27.7x, TransDigm (TDG) 25.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

TransDigm (TDG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +3.4%, Rtx (RTX) +11.6%, TransDigm (TDG) +16.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

TransDigm (TDG) has the highest net margin (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 7.8%, Rtx (RTX) 8.8%, TransDigm (TDG) 19.1%). On return on invested capital, TransDigm (TDG) leads (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 13.9%, Rtx (RTX) 8.6%, TransDigm (TDG) 15.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rtx (RTX) returned the most: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) -26.3%, Rtx (RTX) +10.5%, TransDigm (TDG) -16.9%. Over five years, Rtx (RTX) compounded fastest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +7.2%/yr, Rtx (RTX) +17.3%/yr, TransDigm (TDG) +12.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rtx (RTX) has the highest dividend yield: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 0.01%, Rtx (RTX) 0.01%, TransDigm (TDG) 0.00%. TransDigm (TDG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rtx (RTX) has been the steadiest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 35.6%, Rtx (RTX) 25.1%, TransDigm (TDG) 27.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LDOS, RTX and TDG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rtx (RTX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.