LDOS vs KBR vs ESLT Stock Comparison

Leidos Holdings, Kbr and Elbit Systems Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$139.91 +13.2% 1M -26.3% 1Y
Market cap
$17.59B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.63B
Div. yield
0.01%
Defense Industrials
2 wins
KBR Kbr, Inc.
$40.01 +15.9% 1M -9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.06B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.72B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd
$777.96 +5.8% 1M +58.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.14B
P/E
56.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.55B
Div. yield
0.00%
Defense Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Elbit Systems leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Elbit Systems 6, Kbr 4, Leidos Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLDOSKBRESLTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.59B $5.06B $36.14B ESLT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.8x 11.9x 56.8x KBR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.0x 9.7x 55.8x KBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.4% -3.6% +13.7% ESLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 5.5% 7.4% LDOS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.9% 13.0% 17.8% ESLT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 2.5x -0.9x ESLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% KBR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.3% -9.2% +58.2% ESLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.2%/yr -1.1%/yr +37.4%/yr ESLT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.6% 33.9% 44.8% KBR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 59/100 60/100 LDOS

Percentile Scorecard

LDOSKBRESLT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLDOSKBRESLT
Valuation 98 #3 of 100 99 #2 of 100 46 #55 of 100
Growth 57 #42 of 97 44 #55 of 97 88 #13 of 97
Profitability 85 #15 of 96 66 #33 of 96 74 #26 of 96
Financial Health 34 #70 of 105 16 #88 of 105 58 #45 of 105
Shareholder Returns 75 #17 of 64 70 #20 of 64 37 #41 of 64
Overall 70 59 60
  • LDOS ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • KBR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • ESLT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLDOSKBRESLTSPY
1 month +13.2%+15.9%+5.8% -0.8%
3 months +21.6%+8.7%-4.3% +3.5%
6 months -3.0%+13.4%-5.1% +7.0%
Year to date -22.4%-0.5%+34.7% +12.2%
1 year -26.3%-9.2%+58.2% +13.0%
3 years +54.6%-30.0%+318.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +15.6%-11.2%+61.2% +23.1%
5 years +41.4%-5.3%+389.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.2%-1.1%+37.4% +11.0%
10 years +235.6%+172.5%+696.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.9%+10.5%+23.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLDOSKBRESLTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.6%33.9%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%34.1%39.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.540.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.74-0.271.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-58.3%-35.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.9%-11.0%-23.3% -1.8%
52-week high $199.55$44.98$1,014.33 $779.14
52-week low $100.00$30.06$454.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLDOSKBRESLT
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 26.8x 11.9xmedian 26.8x 55.9xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.9x 0.7xmedian 2.9x 4.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 15.2x 8.1xmedian 15.2x 36.4xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 25.5x 14.2xmedian 25.5x 36.4xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.5x 3.1xmedian 2.5x 8.2xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.94 0.14median 0.94 1.78median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLDOSKBRESLT
Revenue $17.63B $7.72B $8.55B
Gross profit $3.14B $1.12B $2.14B
Operating income $2.03B $734.00M $787.82M
Net income $1.40B $429.00M $636.61M
Free cash flow $2.16B $355.00M $992.19M
R&D – – $582.72M
EPS (diluted) $10.92 $3.34 $13.56
Cash & equivalents $748.00M $312.00M $255.34M
Total debt $21.66B $2.55B $92.13M
Shares (diluted) 126.00M 127.00M 46.92M
Enterprise value $14.30B $3.33B $32.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLDOSKBRESLT
P/E 12.8x 11.9x 55.9x
P/FCF 8.1x 14.2x 36.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.6x 12.3x 36.4x
P/S 1.0x 0.7x 4.2x
P/B 3.3x 3.1x 8.2x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 5.3x 8.2x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 8.1x 36.4x
EV/EBIT 11.3x 9.9x 44.8x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 0.9x 4.1x
EV/FCF 10.6x 20.5x 35.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x 17.8x 35.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 0.14 1.78

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLDOSKBRESLT
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.4% -3.6% 13.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 4.9% 14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.8% -4.5% 18.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 6.4% 14.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.4% 3.5% 37.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.1% 22.3% 26.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.8% 16.3% 58.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.8% 86.3% 33.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.3% 18.0% 50.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 87.6% 31.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 54.9% -18.5% 22.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.7% -4.5% 82.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.2% -22.5% 105.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.7% -2.2% 175.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLDOSKBRESLT
Gross margin 17.8% 14.5% 25.0%
EBITDA margin 13.2% 11.7% 11.3%
Operating margin 11.5% 9.5% 9.2%
Pretax margin 10.2% 7.5% 8.1%
Net margin 7.8% 5.5% 7.4%
FCF margin 12.3% 4.6% 11.6%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% 5.3% 11.6%
Return on equity 26.8% 26.6% 14.7%
Return on assets 9.0% 6.5% 4.7%
Return on invested capital 13.9% 13.0% 17.8%
Return on capital employed 16.5% 14.9% 11.0%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.2x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.0x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLDOSKBRESLT
Debt / assets 38.6% 38.3% 0.7%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 2.5x -0.9x
Debt / FCF 2.8x 7.2x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 75.4% 68.2%
Equity / assets 34.1% 24.6% 31.8%
Interest coverage – 5.0x –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.20 2.56 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLDOSKBRESLT
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.7% 0.5%
Net buyback yield 3.7% 3.1% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 4.7% 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 15.5% 19.8% 22.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.0% 23.9% 14.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.3% 4.9% -54.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 7.2% -17.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLDOSKBRESLT
Forward P/E 11.0xFY2026 9.7xFY2026 55.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.75FY2026 $4.13FY2026 $13.93FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +22.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.0% -6.8% +21.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.52BFY2026 $8.58BFY2026 $8.84BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.9% -3.3% +21.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLDOSKBRESLT
Held by institutions 79.3% 100.0% 19.9%
Institutions holding 773 363 384
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% +7.4% -7.1%
Institutions buying 380 206 202
Institutions selling 294 115 106
Buyers to sellers 1.29 1.79 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LDOSKBRESLT
LDOS 1.00 0.58 0.25
KBR 0.58 1.00 0.29
ESLT 0.25 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LDOS, KBR and ESLT?

Elbit Systems (ESLT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) $17.59B, Kbr (KBR) $5.06B, Elbit Systems (ESLT) $36.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, LDOS, KBR and ESLT?

Kbr (KBR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 12.8x, Kbr (KBR) 11.9x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 56.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kbr (KBR) is cheapest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 11.0x, Kbr (KBR) 9.7x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 55.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Elbit Systems (ESLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +3.4%, Kbr (KBR) -3.6%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +13.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Leidos Holdings (LDOS) has the highest net margin (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 7.8%, Kbr (KBR) 5.5%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 7.4%). On return on invested capital, Elbit Systems (ESLT) leads (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 13.9%, Kbr (KBR) 13.0%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 17.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Elbit Systems (ESLT) returned the most: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) -26.3%, Kbr (KBR) -9.2%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +58.2%. Over five years, Elbit Systems (ESLT) compounded fastest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +7.2%/yr, Kbr (KBR) -1.1%/yr, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +37.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kbr (KBR) has the highest dividend yield: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 0.01%, Kbr (KBR) 0.02%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 0.00%. Elbit Systems (ESLT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kbr (KBR) has been the steadiest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 35.6%, Kbr (KBR) 33.9%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LDOS, KBR and ESLT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Elbit Systems (ESLT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.