LCUT vs NWL Stock Comparison

Lifetime Brands and Newell Brands Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc
$8.28 -11.5% 1M +145.0% 1Y
Market cap
$184.96M
P/E
5.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$661.06M
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.41 -0.4% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.30B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.25B
Div. yield
0.05%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lifetime Brands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lifetime Brands 8, Newell Brands 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLCUTNWLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $184.96M $2.30B NWL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.8x -10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.2x 7.5x LCUT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.5% -2.0% LCUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.8% -3.0% LCUT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.6% 2.2% LCUT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 10.0x LCUT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +145.0% +8.6% LCUT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.3%/yr -24.3%/yr LCUT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.6% 61.9% NWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 47/100 LCUT

Percentile Scorecard

LCUTNWL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLCUTNWL
Valuation 98 #2 of 42 54 #20 of 42
Growth 76 #11 of 42 49 #22 of 42
Profitability 77 #10 of 40 33 #27 of 40
Financial Health 45 #24 of 43 12 #38 of 43
Shareholder Returns 33 #19 of 28 89 #4 of 28
Overall 66 47
  • LCUT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • NWL ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLCUTNWLSPY
1 month -11.5%-0.4% -0.8%
3 months -6.2%+4.4% +3.5%
6 months +17.4%+29.4% +7.0%
Year to date +109.6%+45.4% +12.2%
1 year +145.0%+8.6% +13.0%
3 years +56.5%-18.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.1%-6.7% +23.1%
5 years -51.0%-75.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.3%-24.3% +11.0%
10 years -40.9%-89.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year -5.1%-20.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLCUTNWLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.6%61.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.5%66.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.921.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.780.14 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.5%-88.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.4%-14.9% -1.8%
52-week high $9.90$6.36 $779.14
52-week low $2.98$3.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLCUTNWL
P/E now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 16.1x -10.4xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 12.1x 14.9xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 11.9x 19.5xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.2x 0.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.64 -0.86median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLCUTNWL
Revenue $661.06M $7.25B
Gross profit $286.63M $2.57B
Operating income $56.07M $164.00M
Net income $31.80M -$221.00M
Free cash flow $20.78M $118.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.41 $-0.51
Cash & equivalents $5.45M $209.00M
Total debt $148.24M $5.01B
Shares (diluted) 22.61M 430.20M
Enterprise value $149.25M $1.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLCUTNWL
P/E 5.7x -10.4x
P/FCF 9.2x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 6.9x 7.0x
P/S 0.3x 0.3x
P/B 0.9x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 4.2x 14.9x
EV/EBIT 5.9x 43.3x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 1.0x
EV/FCF 16.0x 60.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.1x 21.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 -0.86

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLCUTNWL
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.5% -2.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.2% -5.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.6% 1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 2.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 566.4% 105.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.7% 45.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 191.8% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 11.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 188.0% 11.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.5% 12.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.3% 105.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.8% -10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.8% 213.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.7% -5.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLCUTNWL
Gross margin 43.4% 35.5%
EBITDA margin 12.1% 6.6%
Operating margin 8.5% 2.3%
Pretax margin 5.7% -2.5%
Net margin 4.8% -3.0%
FCF margin 3.1% 1.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4.2% 4.6%
Return on equity 15.3% -9.2%
Return on assets 5.5% -2.0%
Return on invested capital 13.6% 2.2%
Return on capital employed 14.2% 2.0%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLCUTNWL
Debt / assets 24.0% 45.3%
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 10.0x
Debt / FCF 7.1x 42.4x
Liabilities / assets 64.8% 77.8%
Equity / assets 35.2% 22.2%
Interest coverage 3.0x –
Current ratio 2.1x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.92 0.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLCUTNWL
Dividend yield 2.0% 5.2%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -57.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 106.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -26.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLCUTNWL
Forward P/E 4.2xFY2026 7.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.96FY2026 $0.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +142.0%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -46.9% -5.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $703.72MFY2026 $6.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.6%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.6% +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLCUTNWL
Held by institutions 43.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 88 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.6% +9.2%
Institutions buying 65 234
Institutions selling 15 124
Buyers to sellers 4.33 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LCUTNWL
LCUT 1.00 0.04
NWL 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LCUT and NWL?

Newell Brands (NWL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) $184.96M, Newell Brands (NWL) $2.30B.

Which company is growing faster?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) -1.5%, Newell Brands (NWL) -2.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) has the highest net margin (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 4.8%, Newell Brands (NWL) -3.0%). On return on invested capital, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 13.6%, Newell Brands (NWL) 2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lifetime Brands (LCUT) returned the most: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) +145.0%, Newell Brands (NWL) +8.6%. Over five years, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) compounded fastest (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) -13.3%/yr, Newell Brands (NWL) -24.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 0.00%, Newell Brands (NWL) 0.05%. Lifetime Brands (LCUT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Newell Brands (NWL) has been the steadiest (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 81.6%, Newell Brands (NWL) 61.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LCUT and NWL move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.04, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LCUT and NWL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.