LCUT vs NWL vs VIOT Stock Comparison

Lifetime Brands, Newell Brands and Viomi Technology Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc
$8.24 -10.6% 1M +127.6% 1Y
Market cap
$189.43M
P/E
5.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$661.06M
Div. yield
2.00%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.21 -4.2% 1M +4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.25B
Div. yield
5.37%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lifetime Brands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lifetime Brands 8, Newell Brands 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLCUTNWLVIOTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $189.43M $2.22B $94.52M NWL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.7x -10.0x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.2x 7.2x — LCUT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.5% -2.0% — LCUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.8% -3.0% — LCUT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.6% 2.2% — LCUT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 10.0x — LCUT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.00% 5.37% 5.04% NWL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +127.6% +4.2% -50.9% LCUT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.5%/yr -25.6%/yr -20.6%/yr LCUT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.4% 61.9% 98.2% NWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 48/100 — LCUT

Percentile Scorecard

LCUTNWLVIOT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLCUTNWLVIOT
Valuation 98 #2 of 41 55 #19 of 41 –
Growth 75 #11 of 41 48 #22 of 41 –
Profitability 76 #10 of 39 34 #26 of 39 –
Financial Health 45 #24 of 43 10 #39 of 43 86 #7 of 43
Shareholder Returns 33 #19 of 28 93 #3 of 28 89 #4 of 28
Overall 65 48 –
  • LCUT ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • NWL ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • VIOT ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLCUTNWLVIOTSPY
1 month -10.6%-4.2%-12.6% +0.9%
3 months -1.7%+0.4%+80.5% +5.9%
6 months +23.7%+32.2%+43.3% +8.5%
Year to date +108.6%+40.1%-24.5% +13.3%
1 year +127.6%+4.2%-50.9% +12.4%
3 years +55.8%-21.8%+51.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +15.9%-7.9%+14.8% +23.5%
5 years -51.4%-77.2%-68.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year -13.5%-25.6%-20.6% +11.0%
10 years -41.6%-89.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -5.2%-20.1%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLCUTNWLVIOTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.4%61.9%98.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.4%66.5%81.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.921.260.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.570.07-0.52 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.5%-88.1%-89.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.8%-18.1%-55.6% -0.9%
52-week high $9.90$6.36$3.13 $779.14
52-week low $2.98$3.11$0.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLCUTNWLVIOT
P/E now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 15.7x -10.0xmedian 15.7x —median 15.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 9.6x 14.7xmedian 9.6x —median 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 11.7x 18.8xmedian 11.7x —median 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.1x 0.9xmedian 1.1x 0.4xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.62 -0.83median 0.62 —median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLCUTNWLVIOT
Revenue $661.06M $7.25B –
Gross profit $286.63M $2.57B –
Operating income $56.07M $164.00M –
Net income $31.80M -$221.00M –
Free cash flow $20.78M $118.00M –
EPS (diluted) $1.41 $-0.51 –
Cash & equivalents $5.45M $209.00M $88.99M
Total debt $148.24M $5.01B $16.82M
Shares (diluted) 22.61M 430.20M 70.31M
Enterprise value $153.72M $1.38B -$403.12M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLCUTNWLVIOT
P/E 5.7x -10.0x –
P/FCF 9.1x 18.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 6.9x 6.7x –
P/S 0.3x 0.3x –
P/B 0.9x 0.9x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 2.5x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 4.1x 14.7x –
EV/EBIT 5.9x 42.8x –
EV/Revenue 0.5x 1.0x –
EV/FCF 16.0x 59.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.1x 21.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 -0.83 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLCUTNWLVIOT
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.5% -2.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.2% -5.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.6% 1.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 2.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 566.4% 105.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.7% 45.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 191.8% 9.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 11.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 188.0% 11.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.5% 12.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.3% 105.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.8% -10.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.8% 213.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.7% -5.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLCUTNWLVIOT
Gross margin 43.4% 35.5% –
EBITDA margin 12.1% 6.6% –
Operating margin 8.5% 2.3% –
Pretax margin 5.7% -2.5% –
Net margin 4.8% -3.0% –
FCF margin 3.1% 1.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 4.2% 4.6% –
Return on equity 15.3% -9.2% –
Return on assets 5.5% -2.0% –
Return on invested capital 13.6% 2.2% –
Return on capital employed 14.2% 2.0% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x -1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLCUTNWLVIOT
Debt / assets 24.0% 45.3% 5.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 10.0x –
Debt / FCF 7.1x 42.4x –
Liabilities / assets 64.8% 77.8% 35.4%
Equity / assets 35.2% 22.2% 64.6%
Interest coverage 3.0x – –
Current ratio 2.1x 1.1x 2.5x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 1.92 0.49 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLCUTNWLVIOT
Dividend yield 2.0% 5.4% 5.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 5.4% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -57.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 106.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -26.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLCUTNWLVIOT
Forward P/E 4.2xFY2026 7.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.96FY2026 $0.72FY2026 $-0.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +142.0%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026 -130.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -46.9% -5.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $703.72MFY2026 $6.86BFY2026 $244.47MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.6%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026 -29.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.6% +15.0% +3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLCUTNWLVIOT
Held by institutions 43.3% 100.0% 6.8%
Institutions holding 88 421 29
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.6% +9.2% +10.0%
Institutions buying 65 234 8
Institutions selling 15 124 9
Buyers to sellers 4.33 1.89 0.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LCUTNWLVIOT
LCUT 1.00 0.04 0.03
NWL 0.04 1.00 0.01
VIOT 0.03 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LCUT, NWL and VIOT?

Newell Brands (NWL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) $189.43M, Newell Brands (NWL) $2.22B, Viomi Technology (VIOT) $94.52M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) -1.5%, Newell Brands (NWL) -2.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) has the highest net margin (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 4.8%, Newell Brands (NWL) -3.0%). On return on invested capital, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 13.6%, Newell Brands (NWL) 2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lifetime Brands (LCUT) returned the most: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) +127.6%, Newell Brands (NWL) +4.2%, Viomi Technology (VIOT) -50.9%. Over five years, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) compounded fastest (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) -13.5%/yr, Newell Brands (NWL) -25.6%/yr, Viomi Technology (VIOT) -20.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Newell Brands (NWL) has the highest dividend yield: Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 2.00%, Newell Brands (NWL) 5.37%, Viomi Technology (VIOT) 5.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Newell Brands (NWL) has been the steadiest (Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 81.4%, Newell Brands (NWL) 61.9%, Viomi Technology (VIOT) 98.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LCUT, NWL and VIOT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.