LCU vs LZM Stock Comparison

Lion Copper and Lifezone Metals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LCU Lion Copper Corp.
$4.34 -18.3% 1M +78.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.07B
P/E
287.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins
LZM Lifezone Metals Ltd
$3.37 -15.7% 1M -37.8% 1Y
Market cap
$271.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Lion Copper leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Lion Copper 2, Lifezone Metals 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLCULZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.07B $271.13M LCU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 287.5x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +78.6% -37.8% LCU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.0%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 153.2% 79.5% LZM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

LCULZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLCULZM
Valuation 35 #106 of 162 –
Growth 82 #27 of 147 –
Profitability 15 #104 of 122 –
Financial Health 43 #95 of 165 17 #138 of 165
Shareholder Returns 67 #36 of 107 –
Overall 48 –
  • LCU ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LZM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLCULZMSPY
1 month -18.3%-15.7% -0.8%
3 months -19.6%+1.5% +3.5%
6 months -30.1%-31.8% +7.0%
Year to date +14.8%-21.1% +12.2%
1 year +78.6%-37.8% +13.0%
3 years +129.6%-66.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +32.0%-30.4% +23.1%
5 years +34.0%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.0%— +11.0%
10 years +221.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLCULZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 153.2%79.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 187.5%79.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.082.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.51-0.48 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.3%-82.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-43.5% -1.8%
52-week high $8.68$5.96 $779.14
52-week low $2.43$3.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLCULZM
P/E now vs peer median 260.0xmedian 12.8x —median 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 144.8xmedian 15.2x —median 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 91.2xmedian 2.1x 3.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 5.14median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLCULZM
Operating income -$14.76M –
Net income -$2.10M –
Free cash flow $12.93M –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 –
Cash & equivalents – $37.30M
Total debt $11.38M –
Shares (diluted) 430.24M 118.96M
Enterprise value $2.07B $171.89M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLCULZM
P/E 260.0x –
P/FCF 144.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 144.3x –
P/S – –
P/B 91.2x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 91.2x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT -127.0x –
EV/Revenue – –
EV/FCF 145.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 144.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.14 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLCULZM
Revenue growth (1Y) – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -273.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -60.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 59.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 290.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 50.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 327.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 326.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLCULZM
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin – –
Net margin – –
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity -66.5% –
Return on assets -29.7% –
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed -55.8% –
Asset turnover – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -6.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLCULZM
Debt / assets 6.0% –
Debt / equity 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 54.7%
Equity / assets 47.0% 45.3%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.7x
Quick ratio – 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.6x
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLCULZM
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% –
Shareholder yield -0.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLCULZM
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.31FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.57MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +45.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -11.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLCULZM
Held by institutions – 29.5%
Institutions holding – 90
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.5%
Institutions buying – 63
Institutions selling – 17
Buyers to sellers – 3.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LCULZM
LCU 1.00 0.01
LZM 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LCU and LZM?

Lion Copper (LCU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lion Copper (LCU) $2.07B, Lifezone Metals (LZM) $271.13M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lion Copper (LCU) returned the most: Lion Copper (LCU) +78.6%, Lifezone Metals (LZM) -37.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lifezone Metals (LZM) has been the steadiest (Lion Copper (LCU) 153.2%, Lifezone Metals (LZM) 79.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LCU and LZM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.01, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LCU and LZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lion Copper (LCU) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.