LCU vs HBM Stock Comparison

Lion Copper and Hudbay Minerals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LCU Lion Copper Corp.
$4.34 -18.3% 1M +78.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.10B
P/E
291.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
1 win
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.
$22.16 -16.8% 1M +40.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.00B
P/E
13.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.47B
Div. yield
0.00%
Copper Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Hudbay Minerals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Hudbay Minerals 5, Lion Copper 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLCUHBMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.10B $9.00B HBM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 291.8x 13.2x HBM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +12.1% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 27.7% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +78.6% +40.0% LCU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.0%/yr +26.0%/yr HBM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 153.2% 62.6% HBM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 70/100 HBM

Percentile Scorecard

LCUHBM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLCUHBM
Valuation 35 #106 of 162 83 #29 of 162
Growth 82 #27 of 147 89 #17 of 147
Profitability 15 #104 of 122 87 #17 of 122
Financial Health 43 #95 of 165 49 #85 of 165
Shareholder Returns 67 #36 of 107 43 #62 of 107
Overall 48 70
  • LCU ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • HBM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLCUHBMSPY
1 month -18.3%-16.8% -0.8%
3 months -19.6%-1.0% +3.5%
6 months -30.1%-9.2% +7.0%
Year to date +14.8%+11.6% +12.2%
1 year +78.6%+40.0% +13.0%
3 years +129.6%+405.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +32.0%+71.7% +23.1%
5 years +34.0%+217.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.0%+26.0% +11.0%
10 years +221.5%+475.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.4%+19.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLCUHBMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 153.2%62.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 187.5%67.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.082.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.510.64 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.3%-63.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-30.5% -1.8%
52-week high $8.68$31.87 $779.14
52-week low $2.43$14.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLCUHBM
P/E now vs peer median 260.0xmedian 12.8x 12.8xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 3.6xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x 5.9xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 144.8xmedian 15.2x 10.0xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 91.2xmedian 2.1x 1.8xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 5.14median 0.29 0.04median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLCUHBM
Revenue – $2.47B
Gross profit – $972.40M
Operating income -$14.76M $1.10B
Net income -$2.10M $680.00M
Free cash flow $12.93M $880.20M
R&D – $58.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $1.72
Cash & equivalents – $890.90M
Total debt $11.38M $3.67B
Shares (diluted) 430.24M 396.65M
Enterprise value $2.10B $5.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLCUHBM
P/E 260.0x 12.8x
P/FCF 144.8x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 144.3x 10.0x
P/S – 3.6x
P/B 91.2x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 91.2x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 5.9x
EV/EBIT -127.0x 8.1x
EV/Revenue – 3.6x
EV/FCF 145.0x 10.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 144.5x 10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.14 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLCUHBM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 12.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 24.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 32.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 71.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -273.0% 89.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -60.5% 126.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 59.0% 139.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% 410.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 290.3% 122.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 50.6% 346.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 327.6% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 326.9% 2,912%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.3% 115.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLCUHBM
Gross margin – 39.4%
EBITDA margin – 61.9%
Operating margin – 44.7%
Pretax margin – 47.3%
Net margin – 27.7%
FCF margin – 35.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 35.6%
Return on equity -66.5% 16.3%
Return on assets -29.7% 43.1%
Return on invested capital – 12.6%
Return on capital employed -55.8% –
Asset turnover – 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -6.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLCUHBM
Debt / assets 6.0% 78.4%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.1x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 53.0% -231.7%
Equity / assets 47.0% 331.7%
Interest coverage – 14.9x
Current ratio 1.1x –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLCUHBM
Dividend yield – 0.1%
Net buyback yield -0.2% -0.4%
Shareholder yield -0.2% -0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 1.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -260.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -59.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLCUHBM
Forward P/E – 15.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +120.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +27.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +37.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLCUHBM
Held by institutions – 83.1%
Institutions holding – 319
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.9%
Institutions buying – 200
Institutions selling – 82
Buyers to sellers – 2.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LCUHBM
LCU 1.00 -0.02
HBM -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LCU and HBM?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lion Copper (LCU) $2.10B, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) $9.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, LCU and HBM?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lion Copper (LCU) 291.8x, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lion Copper (LCU) returned the most: Lion Copper (LCU) +78.6%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +40.0%. Over five years, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) compounded fastest (Lion Copper (LCU) +6.0%/yr, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) has been the steadiest (Lion Copper (LCU) 153.2%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 62.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LCU and HBM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.02, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LCU and HBM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.