LAR vs SGML vs LAC Stock Comparison

Lithium Argentina AG, Sigma Lithium and Lithium Americas Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAR Lithium Argentina AG
$4.16 -24.8% 1M -7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$743.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$225.80M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
5 wins
SGML Sigma Lithium Corp
$7.86 -18.0% 1M +30.6% 1Y
Market cap
$942.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$142.49M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
4 wins
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.
$2.01 -26.9% 1M -70.1% 1Y
Market cap
$804.93M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lithium Argentina AG leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lithium Argentina AG 5, Sigma Lithium 4, Lithium Americas 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLARSGMLLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $743.56M $942.82M $804.93M SGML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.8x -34.2x -26.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.9x 25.4x — LAR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +371.3% +7.3% — LAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -23.9% -19.3% — SGML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 0.0% — LAR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.4x 7.6x — LAR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.1% +30.6% -70.1% SGML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.1%/yr -2.0%/yr — SGML
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.2% 111.9% 66.3% LAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 43/100 — LAR

Percentile Scorecard

LARSGMLLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLARSGMLLAC
Valuation 71 #47 of 162 42 #95 of 162 93 #13 of 162
Growth 74 #39 of 147 77 #34 of 147 –
Profitability 41 #73 of 122 47 #65 of 122 –
Financial Health 74 #43 of 165 6 #156 of 165 46 #90 of 165
Shareholder Returns 72 #31 of 107 – –
Overall 66 43 –
  • LAR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SGML ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLARSGMLLACSPY
1 month -24.8%-18.0%-26.9% -0.8%
3 months -29.4%-21.0%-30.7% +3.5%
6 months -58.3%-62.0%-61.7% +7.0%
Year to date -25.4%-40.4%-53.9% +12.2%
1 year -7.1%+30.6%-70.1% +13.0%
3 years -28.4%-71.7%-70.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -10.5%-34.3%-33.6% +23.1%
5 years -60.9%-9.4%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.1%-2.0%— +11.0%
10 years +255.6%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +13.5%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLARSGMLLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.2%111.9%66.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.6%98.8%64.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.592.152.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.27-1.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-89.9%-82.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-66.8%-68.8% -1.8%
52-week high $11.79$23.65$6.44 $779.14
52-week low $3.72$4.68$2.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLARSGMLLAC
P/E now vs peer median -12.5xmedian 12.8x -31.7xmedian 12.8x -25.0xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.1x 6.1xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 7.0x 39.1xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -33.9xmedian 15.2x 36.0xmedian 15.2x —median 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.1x 10.6xmedian 2.1x 0.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 0.29 -0.77median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLARSGMLLAC
Revenue $225.80M $142.49M –
Gross profit $110.90M $70.02M –
Operating income $256.12M $10.66M –
Net income -$18.74M -$27.56M -$73.07M
Free cash flow -$19.96M $24.30M –
R&D $4.53M – -$1.00K
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $-0.25 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $99.72M $16.66M $822.78M
Total debt -$925.15M $226.73M $988.02M
Shares (diluted) 162.17M 111.31M 401.74M
Enterprise value $303.14M $909.99M -$1.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLARSGMLLAC
P/E -12.5x -31.7x -25.0x
P/FCF -33.9x 36.0x –
P/Operating cash flow -33.9x 23.2x –
P/S 3.0x 6.1x –
P/B 0.8x 10.6x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 10.6x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x 39.1x –
EV/EBIT 3.6x 101.9x –
EV/Revenue 1.5x 7.6x –
EV/FCF -17.2x 44.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow -17.2x 28.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 -0.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLARSGMLLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 371.3% 7.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32,338% 130.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 213.4% 40.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 48.1% 42.1% -33.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.8% 39.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 95.8% 42.6% 63.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -57.1% 41.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% 148.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.4% 41.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.8% 14,876% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 30.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLARSGMLLAC
Gross margin 49.1% 49.1% –
EBITDA margin 43.1% 19.5% –
Operating margin 113.4% 7.5% –
Pretax margin -12.2% -6.9% –
Net margin -23.9% -19.3% –
FCF margin -8.8% 17.1% –
Operating cash flow margin -8.8% 26.5% –
Return on equity 1.6% -17.5% –
Return on assets 1.2% -3.4% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 0.0% –
Return on capital employed 6.9% 7.9% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.9% 7.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLARSGMLLAC
Debt / assets -14.7% 47.4% 27.9%
Debt / equity -0.2x 2.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.4x 7.6x –
Debt / FCF 8.5x 9.3x –
Liabilities / assets 27.2% 82.8% 44.9%
Equity / assets 72.8% 17.2% 55.1%
Interest coverage 161.6x – –
Current ratio -2.0x 0.3x 5.5x
Quick ratio -0.7x 0.2x 3.5x
Cash ratio -0.7x 0.1x 3.5x
Altman Z-score 1.63 0.47 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLARSGMLLAC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% – –
Shareholder yield -0.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLARSGMLLAC
Forward P/E 18.9xFY2026 25.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.22FY2026 $0.31FY2026 $-0.08FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.3% +419.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $174.11MFY2026 $0.00FY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +58.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +144.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLARSGMLLAC
Held by institutions 33.9% 33.1% 30.8%
Institutions holding 164 119 274
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +9.7% -0.6%
Institutions buying 75 65 149
Institutions selling 48 40 57
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.63 2.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LARSGMLLAC
LAR 1.00 0.61 0.73
SGML 0.61 1.00 0.52
LAC 0.73 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAR, SGML and LAC?

Sigma Lithium (SGML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) $743.56M, Sigma Lithium (SGML) $942.82M, Lithium Americas (LAC) $804.93M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +371.3%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +7.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sigma Lithium (SGML) has the highest net margin (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -23.9%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -19.3%). On return on invested capital, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) leads (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 0.0%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sigma Lithium (SGML) returned the most: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -7.1%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +30.6%, Lithium Americas (LAC) -70.1%. Over five years, Sigma Lithium (SGML) compounded fastest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -17.1%/yr, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lithium Americas (LAC) has been the steadiest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 74.2%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 111.9%, Lithium Americas (LAC) 66.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAR, SGML and LAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.