LAR vs PKX vs SGML Stock Comparison

Lithium Argentina AG, Posco Holdings and Sigma Lithium Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAR Lithium Argentina AG
$4.16 -24.8% 1M -7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$675.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$225.80M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
3 wins
PKX Posco Holdings Inc.
$50.63 -11.0% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.83B
P/E
4.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.16B
Div. yield
3.04%
Steel Basic Materials
5 wins
SGML Sigma Lithium Corp
$7.86 -18.0% 1M +30.6% 1Y
Market cap
$875.63M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$142.49M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Posco Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Posco Holdings 5, Lithium Argentina AG 3, Sigma Lithium 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLARPKXSGMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $675.61M $3.83B $875.63M PKX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -12.5x 4.0x -31.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.9x 10.3x 25.4x PKX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +371.3% -27.8% +7.3% LAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -23.9% 2.5% -19.3% PKX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% PKX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.4x — 7.6x LAR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.04% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.1% -9.6% +30.6% SGML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.1%/yr -4.8%/yr -2.0%/yr SGML
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.2% 45.0% 111.9% PKX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 67/100 43/100 LAR

Percentile Scorecard

LARPKXSGML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLARPKXSGML
Valuation 72 #33 of 114 89 #14 of 114 44 #64 of 114
Growth 73 #28 of 102 36 #66 of 102 76 #25 of 102
Profitability 40 #49 of 81 49 #42 of 81 44 #46 of 81
Financial Health 75 #31 of 120 78 #27 of 120 8 #110 of 120
Shareholder Returns 74 #20 of 73 82 #14 of 73 –
Overall 67 67 43
  • LAR ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining
  • PKX ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SGML ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLARPKXSGMLSPY
1 month -24.8%-11.0%-18.0% -0.8%
3 months -29.4%-4.7%-21.0% +3.5%
6 months -58.3%-28.7%-62.0% +7.0%
Year to date -25.4%-4.8%-40.4% +12.2%
1 year -7.1%-9.6%+30.6% +13.0%
3 years -28.4%-35.1%-71.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -10.5%-13.4%-34.3% +23.1%
5 years -60.9%-21.7%-9.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.1%-4.8%-2.0% +11.0%
10 years +255.6%-5.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +13.5%-0.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLARPKXSGMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.2%45.0%111.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.6%43.1%98.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.591.412.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.10-0.210.27 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-69.8%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-44.8%-66.8% -1.8%
52-week high $11.79$91.72$23.65 $779.14
52-week low $3.72$48.69$4.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLARPKXSGML
P/E now vs peer median -12.5xmedian 10.6x 4.0xmedian 10.6x -31.7xmedian 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.1x 0.1xmedian 3.1x 6.1xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 5.9x —median 5.9x 39.1xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -33.9xmedian 11.3x -0.9xmedian 11.3x 36.0xmedian 11.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.3x 0.1xmedian 2.3x 10.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 0.17 -15.71median 0.17 -0.77median 0.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLARPKXSGML
Revenue $225.80M $37.16B $142.49M
Gross profit $110.90M $3.86B $70.02M
Operating income $256.12M $1.39B $10.66M
Net income -$18.74M $1.47B -$27.56M
Free cash flow -$19.96M -$4.45B $24.30M
R&D $4.53M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $12.52 $-0.25
Cash & equivalents $99.72M – $16.66M
Total debt -$925.15M $749.60M $226.73M
Shares (diluted) 162.17M 75.62M 111.31M
Enterprise value $286.25M $8.17B $842.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLARPKXSGML
P/E -12.5x 4.0x -31.7x
P/FCF -33.9x -0.9x 36.0x
P/Operating cash flow -33.9x – 23.2x
P/S 3.0x 0.1x 6.1x
P/B 0.8x 0.1x 10.6x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 0.1x 10.6x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x – 39.1x
EV/EBIT 3.6x 3.3x 101.9x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 0.1x 7.6x
EV/FCF -17.2x -1.0x 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -17.2x – 28.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 -15.71 -0.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLARPKXSGML
Revenue growth (1Y) 371.3% -27.8% 7.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -15.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32,338% 0.1% 130.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 213.4% 49.9% 40.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -38.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 48.1% 297.8% 42.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.8% 7.9% 39.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 95.8% 163.2% 42.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -57.1% -0.3% 41.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% – 148.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – 41.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.8% 27.9% 14,876%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% -34.8% 30.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLARPKXSGML
Gross margin 49.1% 10.4% 49.1%
EBITDA margin 43.1% – 19.5%
Operating margin 113.4% 3.7% 7.5%
Pretax margin -12.2% 3.5% -6.9%
Net margin -23.9% 2.5% -19.3%
FCF margin -8.8% -12.0% 17.1%
Operating cash flow margin -8.8% – 26.5%
Return on equity 1.6% 3.4% -17.5%
Return on assets 1.2% 3.1% -3.4%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 3.0% 0.0%
Return on capital employed 6.9% 4.1% 7.9%
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – -1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.9% – 7.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLARPKXSGML
Debt / assets -14.7% 2.2% 47.4%
Debt / equity -0.2x 0.0x 2.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.4x – 7.6x
Debt / FCF 8.5x -0.2x 9.3x
Liabilities / assets 27.2% 7.7% 82.8%
Equity / assets 72.8% 92.3% 17.2%
Interest coverage 161.6x 0.5x –
Current ratio -2.0x – 0.3x
Quick ratio -0.7x – 0.2x
Cash ratio -0.7x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.63 – 0.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLARPKXSGML
Dividend yield – 3.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.2% – –
Shareholder yield -0.2% 3.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLARPKXSGML
Forward P/E 18.9xFY2026 10.3xFY2026 25.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.22FY2026 $4.90FY2026 $0.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +245.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +27.3% +14.7% +419.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $52.03BFY2026 $174.11MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.5% +144.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLARPKXSGML
Held by institutions 33.9% 17.7% 33.1%
Institutions holding 164 181 119
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +38.2% +9.7%
Institutions buying 75 131 65
Institutions selling 48 30 40
Buyers to sellers 1.56 4.37 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LARPKXSGML
LAR 1.00 0.38 0.61
PKX 0.38 1.00 0.26
SGML 0.61 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAR, PKX and SGML?

Posco Holdings (PKX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) $675.61M, Posco Holdings (PKX) $3.83B, Sigma Lithium (SGML) $875.63M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +371.3%, Posco Holdings (PKX) -27.8%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +7.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Posco Holdings (PKX) has the highest net margin (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -23.9%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 2.5%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -19.3%). On return on invested capital, Posco Holdings (PKX) leads (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 0.0%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 3.0%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sigma Lithium (SGML) returned the most: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -7.1%, Posco Holdings (PKX) -9.6%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +30.6%. Over five years, Sigma Lithium (SGML) compounded fastest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -17.1%/yr, Posco Holdings (PKX) -4.8%/yr, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Posco Holdings (PKX) 3.04%. Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) and Sigma Lithium (SGML) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Posco Holdings (PKX) has been the steadiest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 74.2%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 45.0%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 111.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAR, PKX and SGML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Posco Holdings (PKX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.