LAR vs PKX vs IONR Stock Comparison

Lithium Argentina AG, Posco Holdings and Ioneer Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAR Lithium Argentina AG
$4.55 -16.1% 1M +8.1% 1Y
Market cap
$738.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$225.80M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
2 wins
PKX Posco Holdings Inc.
$52.15 -10.0% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.94B
P/E
4.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.16B
Div. yield
2.95%
Steel Basic Materials
7 wins
IONR ioneer Ltd
$2.80 -10.5% 1M -40.7% 1Y
Market cap
$187.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Posco Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Posco Holdings 7, Lithium Argentina AG 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLARPKXIONRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $738.95M $3.94B $187.22M PKX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.7x 4.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.7x 10.6x — PKX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +371.3% -27.8% — LAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -23.9% 2.5% — PKX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 3.0% — PKX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.95% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.1% -7.2% -40.7% LAR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.2%/yr -3.8%/yr — PKX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.4% 45.0% 79.3% PKX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 69/100 — PKX

Percentile Scorecard

LARPKXIONR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLARPKXIONR
Valuation 71 #47 of 162 89 #19 of 162 –
Growth 75 #38 of 147 38 #92 of 147 –
Profitability 41 #73 of 122 51 #60 of 122 –
Financial Health 74 #43 of 164 79 #35 of 164 98 #4 of 164
Shareholder Returns 74 #29 of 107 86 #16 of 107 –
Overall 67 69 –
  • LAR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • PKX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • IONR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLARPKXIONRSPY
1 month -16.1%-10.0%-10.5% +0.9%
3 months -18.0%+7.1%-13.0% +5.9%
6 months -52.7%-31.7%-28.4% +8.5%
Year to date -18.5%-2.0%-41.7% +13.3%
1 year +8.1%-7.2%-40.7% +12.4%
3 years -21.7%-33.1%-25.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year -7.8%-12.6%-9.2% +23.5%
5 years -61.0%-17.6%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -17.2%-3.8%— +11.0%
10 years +317.4%+2.0%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.4%+0.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLARPKXIONRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.4%45.0%79.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.9%43.3%76.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.621.421.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.11-0.16-0.51 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-69.8%-87.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.4%-43.1%-56.2% -0.9%
52-week high $11.79$91.72$6.39 $779.14
52-week low $3.72$48.69$2.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLARPKXIONR
P/E now vs peer median -13.7xmedian 13.4x 4.2xmedian 13.4x —median 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 3.2x 0.1xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -37.0xmedian 14.8x -0.9xmedian 14.8x —median 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.3x 0.1xmedian 2.3x 0.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.31 -16.18median 0.31 —median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLARPKXIONR
Revenue $225.80M $37.16B –
Gross profit $110.90M $3.86B –
Operating income $256.12M $1.39B –
Net income -$18.74M $1.47B –
Free cash flow -$19.96M -$4.45B –
R&D $4.53M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $12.52 –
Cash & equivalents $99.72M – $58.84M
Total debt -$169.70M $749.60M –
Shares (diluted) 162.17M 75.62M 60.35M
Enterprise value $349.59M $8.29B $52.83M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLARPKXIONR
P/E -13.7x 4.2x –
P/FCF -37.0x -0.9x –
P/Operating cash flow -37.0x – –
P/S 3.3x 0.1x –
P/B 0.9x 0.1x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 0.1x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 4.2x – –
EV/EBIT 4.2x 3.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.8x 0.1x –
EV/FCF -20.4x -1.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow -20.4x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 -16.18 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLARPKXIONR
Revenue growth (1Y) 371.3% -27.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -15.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32,338% 0.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 213.4% 49.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -38.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 48.1% 297.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.8% 7.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 95.8% 163.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -57.1% -0.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.8% 27.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% -34.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLARPKXIONR
Gross margin 49.1% 10.4% –
EBITDA margin 43.1% – –
Operating margin 113.4% 3.7% –
Pretax margin -12.2% 3.5% –
Net margin -23.9% 2.5% –
FCF margin -8.8% -12.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -8.8% – –
Return on equity 1.6% 3.4% –
Return on assets 1.2% 3.1% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 3.0% –
Return on capital employed 6.9% 4.1% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 6.9% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLARPKXIONR
Debt / assets -14.7% 2.2% –
Debt / equity -0.2x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.4x – –
Debt / FCF 8.5x -0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 27.2% 7.7% 0.9%
Equity / assets 72.8% 92.3% 99.1%
Interest coverage 161.6x 0.5x –
Current ratio -2.0x – 25.8x
Quick ratio -0.7x – 25.8x
Cash ratio -0.7x – 25.6x
Altman Z-score 1.75 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLARPKXIONR
Dividend yield – 3.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.2% – –
Shareholder yield -0.2% 3.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLARPKXIONR
Forward P/E 20.7xFY2026 10.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.22FY2026 $4.90FY2026 $0.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +245.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +27.3% +14.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $52.03BFY2026 $717.29KFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.4%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.5% -100.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLARPKXIONR
Held by institutions 33.9% 17.7% 3.9%
Institutions holding 164 181 34
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +38.2% -10.1%
Institutions buying 75 131 20
Institutions selling 48 30 5
Buyers to sellers 1.56 4.37 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LARPKXIONR
LAR 1.00 0.38 0.36
PKX 0.38 1.00 0.08
IONR 0.36 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAR, PKX and IONR?

Posco Holdings (PKX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) $738.95M, Posco Holdings (PKX) $3.94B, Ioneer (IONR) $187.22M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +371.3%, Posco Holdings (PKX) -27.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Posco Holdings (PKX) has the highest net margin (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -23.9%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 2.5%). On return on invested capital, Posco Holdings (PKX) leads (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 0.0%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 3.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) returned the most: Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +8.1%, Posco Holdings (PKX) -7.2%, Ioneer (IONR) -40.7%. Over five years, Posco Holdings (PKX) compounded fastest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -17.2%/yr, Posco Holdings (PKX) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Posco Holdings (PKX) 2.95%. Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) and Ioneer (IONR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Posco Holdings (PKX) has been the steadiest (Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 74.4%, Posco Holdings (PKX) 45.0%, Ioneer (IONR) 79.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAR, PKX and IONR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Posco Holdings (PKX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.