LADR vs RITM vs TPTS Stock Comparison

Ladder Capital, Rithm Capital and Terra Property Trust Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LADR Ladder Capital Corp
$9.36 +9.9% 1M -12.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.16B
P/E
11.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.65M
Div. yield
0.10%
Mortgage REITs Financial Services
6 wins
RITM Rithm Capital Corp.
$9.51 +8.7% 1M -13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.35B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.70B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage REITs Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ladder Capital leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ladder Capital 6, Rithm Capital 4, Terra Property Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLADRRITMTPTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.16B $5.35B $319.59M RITM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.8x 14.9x -8.8x LADR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.1x 4.2x — RITM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -33.3% +17.0% -50.3% RITM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 136.2% 6.3% -164.0% LADR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% 1.4% -6.8% LADR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 11.6x 22.2x -8.8x TPTS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.10% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.7% -13.5% — LADR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.3%/yr -3.8%/yr — RITM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.7% 26.8% 42.0% LADR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 32/100 17/100 LADR

Percentile Scorecard

LADRRITMTPTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLADRRITMTPTS
Valuation 39 #102 of 167 40 #101 of 167 5 #158 of 167
Growth 46 #88 of 162 32 #110 of 162 12 #143 of 162
Profitability 64 #56 of 153 34 #102 of 153 8 #141 of 153
Financial Health 21 #126 of 160 33 #108 of 160 60 #65 of 160
Shareholder Returns 41 #82 of 138 23 #106 of 138 2 #136 of 138
Overall 42 32 17
  • LADR ranked among 172 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RITM ranked among 172 companies in Lending and Credit
  • TPTS ranked among 172 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLADRRITMTPTSSPY
1 month +9.9%+8.7%-4.6% -1.0%
3 months -1.3%-5.8%-20.8% -0.4%
6 months -9.0%-3.4%— +4.5%
Year to date -14.8%-12.8%— +12.4%
1 year -12.7%-13.5%— +13.6%
3 years -12.0%-3.8%— +76.4%
3 years, per year -4.2%-1.3%— +20.8%
5 years -23.9%-17.4%— +63.7%
5 years, per year -5.3%-3.8%— +10.4%
10 years -29.3%-32.2%— +267.7%
10 years, per year -3.4%-3.8%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureLADRRITMTPTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.7%26.8%42.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.2%27.0%51.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.380.740.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.50— 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.3%-39.2%-43.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.0%-21.1%-39.5% -1.6%
52-week high $11.42$12.06$21.70 $779.14
52-week low $8.52$8.36$12.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLADRRITMTPTS
P/E now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 12.0x 14.8xmedian 12.0x -8.8xmedian 12.0x
P/S now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 2.6x 0.9xmedian 2.6x 14.4xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 13.2x 26.1xmedian 13.2x -36.4xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 5.5x -2.6xmedian 5.5x -265.6xmedian 5.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median -1.05median 0.34 -0.61median 0.34 0.76median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLADRRITMTPTS
Revenue $72.65M $5.70B $22.17M
Operating income – – -$16.77M
Net income $98.91M $529.24M -$36.36M
Free cash flow $78.51M -$2.01B -$1.20M
EPS (diluted) $0.79 $0.63 $-1.49
Cash & equivalents $41.78M – $9.70M
Total debt $4.35B $30.15B $111.42M
Shares (diluted) 124.89M 572.82M 24.34M
Enterprise value $1.01B $5.35B $254.35M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLADRRITMTPTS
P/E 11.7x 14.8x -8.8x
P/FCF 15.0x -2.6x -265.6x
P/Operating cash flow 13.5x -3.7x -265.6x
P/S 16.2x 0.9x 14.4x
P/B 0.8x 0.6x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 0.6x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.7x 26.1x -36.4x
EV/EBIT 16.8x 34.5x -25.1x
EV/Revenue 75.5x 6.2x 19.0x
EV/FCF 69.9x -17.7x -350.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 62.5x -24.8x -350.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.05 -0.61 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLADRRITMTPTS
Revenue growth (1Y) -33.3% 17.0% -50.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -22.9% 14.2% -30.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -20,547%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -76.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.9% -42.4% -7.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.0% -13.0% -11.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.4% -55.6% -7.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.2% -24.4% -11.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 574.8% 51.3% -119.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.8% -41.4% -28.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 455.2% 38.1% -119.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.1% -47.7% 69.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLADRRITMTPTS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 512.5% 23.9% -52.1%
Operating margin – – -75.7%
Pretax margin 140.9% 17.0% -120.2%
Net margin 136.2% 6.3% -164.0%
FCF margin 108.1% -35.2% -5.4%
Operating cash flow margin 120.7% -25.1% -5.4%
Return on equity 6.8% 5.8% -21.4%
Return on assets 1.7% 1.0% -10.3%
Return on invested capital 5.6% 1.4% -6.8%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x -2.7x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 33.9% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLADRRITMTPTS
Debt / assets 71.9% 53.2% 44.6%
Debt / equity 3.0x 3.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 11.6x 22.2x -8.8x
Debt / FCF 55.4x -15.0x -92.6x
Liabilities / assets 75.8% 83.9% 49.3%
Equity / assets 24.2% 16.1% 50.7%
Interest coverage 1.5x 16.6x -1.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLADRRITMTPTS
Dividend yield 9.8% 10.5% –
Net buyback yield 2.6% -4.6% –
Shareholder yield 12.5% 6.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 118.0% – -15.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) 148.7% – -466.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.6% – -65.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.1% – -31.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLADRRITMTPTS
Forward P/E 9.1xFY2026 4.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.03FY2026 $2.26FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +22.6%FY2026 -3.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.7% +1.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $287.80MFY2026 $5.78BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 +25.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -10.2% +5.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLADRRITMTPTS
Held by institutions 63.6% 58.7% –
Institutions holding 221 513 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.9% -1.7% –
Institutions buying 118 248 –
Institutions selling 62 176 –
Buyers to sellers 1.90 1.41 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LADRRITMTPTS
LADR 1.00 0.51 0.22
RITM 0.51 1.00 0.22
TPTS 0.22 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LADR, RITM and TPTS?

Rithm Capital (RITM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ladder Capital (LADR) $1.16B, Rithm Capital (RITM) $5.35B, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) $319.59M.

Which stock is cheaper, LADR, RITM and TPTS?

Ladder Capital (LADR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ladder Capital (LADR) 11.8x, Rithm Capital (RITM) 14.9x, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) -8.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rithm Capital (RITM) is cheapest (Ladder Capital (LADR) 9.1x, Rithm Capital (RITM) 4.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rithm Capital (RITM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ladder Capital (LADR) -33.3%, Rithm Capital (RITM) +17.0%, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) -50.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ladder Capital (LADR) has the highest net margin (Ladder Capital (LADR) 136.2%, Rithm Capital (RITM) 6.3%, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) -164.0%). On return on invested capital, Ladder Capital (LADR) leads (Ladder Capital (LADR) 5.6%, Rithm Capital (RITM) 1.4%, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) -6.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ladder Capital (LADR) returned the most: Ladder Capital (LADR) -12.7%, Rithm Capital (RITM) -13.5%. Over five years, Rithm Capital (RITM) compounded fastest (Ladder Capital (LADR) -5.3%/yr, Rithm Capital (RITM) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ladder Capital (LADR) 0.10%, Rithm Capital (RITM) 0.00%. Rithm Capital (RITM) and Terra Property Trust (TPTS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ladder Capital (LADR) has been the steadiest (Ladder Capital (LADR) 21.7%, Rithm Capital (RITM) 26.8%, Terra Property Trust (TPTS) 42.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LADR, RITM and TPTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ladder Capital (LADR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.